On 02.11.2008, at 12:17, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 00:31, Steve McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got it. How's this?
+1 from me :-)
me, too. the new version does sound a bit more inviting than the old
one, good feedback, martijn!
cheers,
tom
--
Martijn Pieters
On 03.11.2008, at 10:27, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I've been told the framework team wants to be involved with setting
timeframes for releases. I want to propose to take this one step
further
during the PLIP handling phase: I would like the framework team to
propose a timeline for PLIP
Tom Lazar wrote:
On 03.11.2008, at 10:27, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I've been told the framework team wants to be involved with setting
timeframes for releases. I want to propose to take this one step further
during the PLIP handling phase: I would like the framework team to
propose a timeline
On 3 nov 2008, at 21:33, Tom Lazar wrote:
On 03.11.2008, at 10:27, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I've been told the framework team wants to be involved with setting
timeframes for releases. I want to propose to take this one step
further
during the PLIP handling phase: I would like the framework
On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:33 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
On 03.11.2008, at 10:27, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I've been told the framework team wants to be involved with setting
timeframes for releases. I want to propose to take this one step
further
during the PLIP handling phase: I would like the
It's off. I've posted to Plone.Org news plus the developers,
product-developers, users and doc-team lists.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Tom Lazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02.11.2008, at 12:17, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 00:31, Steve McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'll get the ball rolling on this.
I'd be interested in serving on the 4.x team. Although I've not made
masses of commits to Plone I do know the internals very well, I think
I must have pdbed or read most of it over the years and I'm
comfortable with development versions. I think
