On May 19, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
The paper mentions Plone, but all they found is that Plone rejects the
bad input but Since this error generates
~100 lines in the log file, it may be used to obfuscate other
attacks. I found no serious vulnerability claim.
How odd. Just did
On May 12, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Ideally, a framework team should have an odd number of members in
order to avoid tie votes. However, in watching the last couple of
voting sessions for Plone 3, I noticed that there were not that many
PLIPS on which every person voted. So, I
On Oct 28, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Alan Runyan wrote:
Andreas,
Please confirm, the outstanding questions are:
- Wichert asking, How are the marshallers configured via
GenericSetup
This is a great question.
- Ricardo asking, how the OS X resource fork issue was resolved.
We should not
On Oct 28, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
If the OSX webdav support was dropped from this PLIP, then perhaps
the PLIP
should be updated to make that clear. At the moment, it clearly
suggests
that the OSX behavior was specifically targeted.
I will leave that up to Sidnei. Having a
On Dec 23, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
To be clear, I believe the only -1 vote on #187 was primarily due to
some concerns about the shortage of detail in the PLIP text. A
concern I share. I'm hoping Sidnei fleshes out the details
soon. :-)
I would gladly answer any
Thanks again Sidnei,
[note to framework list: let me know if I should take this
discussion off list]
Maybe I'm missing something but there doesn't seem to be any reason
to return a 404 (Not Found) or 403 (Forbidding) response. Why not
just silently discard the offending files, along
On Dec 23, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
* Rapahel on #187
please also try to cast those asap. that said, how long do we
want to wait for those missing votes and do we have a plan on how
to proceed if they don't arrive? i'd suggest waiting
