[Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread Rocky Burt
On Wed, 2007-10-01 at 15:00 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: - Add an object_implements index. I know the one that does any adaptable-to interface from membrane is a bit slow, but one that just indexes the names of zope.interface.providedBy(obj).flattened() should be quick. +5 I'm getting tired

[Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread whit
Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi guys, I'm toying with the idea of introducing five.intid as a dependency for Plone 3. Whit is responsible for this creation, so I'd like this input as well, but from discussions with him it seems quite useful. - It can be combined with Zope 3's catalog implementation -

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread whit
Martin Aspeli wrote: - Add the intid from five.intid as an index and metadata. This allows cross-referencing between the two. This seems valuable. It already bridges the annoying gap where we don't currently add UID to the standard catalog as an index or metadata. We could possibly add a

[Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi Whit, On 1/10/07, whit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi guys, I'm toying with the idea of introducing five.intid as a dependency for Plone 3. Whit is responsible for this creation, so I'd like this input as well, but from discussions with him it seems quite useful. -

[Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread whit
Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi Whit, On 1/10/07, whit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi guys, I'm toying with the idea of introducing five.intid as a dependency for Plone 3. Whit is responsible for this creation, so I'd like this input as well, but from discussions with him it

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread Rob Miller
Alec Mitchell wrote: --SNIP all the discussion about five.intid-- Instead, why not make a simple addon product (with a simple GS profile) that installs these dependencies and the necessary utils and indexes, and attach it to a PLIP for 3.5? Having intids would be great, but it would be better

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 1/10/07, Rob Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alec Mitchell wrote: On 1/10/07, Rob Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alec Mitchell wrote: --SNIP all the discussion about five.intid-- Instead, why not make a simple addon product (with a simple GS profile) that installs these dependencies

[Framework-Team] Re: five.intid and object_implements index in Plone 3

2007-01-10 Thread Martijn Faassen
whit wrote: [snip] early stage, not piling too many irreversible dependencies upon it. my reasoning: Much of what is scary to me about this code adapting intid to zope2 is what made it so nice for mfaasen writing it in zope3. Thanks, but I can't claim credit for the intid facility in Zope