Great work so far, framework team!
On 8/17/10 10:39 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
* 30 PLIPs!
* Cover those PLIPs which were dependencies of other PLIPs first.
• 9473 (z3cform)
• Ross: Better than Archetypes at form generation, better
documentation than formlib, but still
Hi folks,
A few comments on things I'm involved in.
• 9473 (z3cform)
• Ross: Better than Archetypes at form generation, better
documentation than formlib, but still requires a lot of knowledge of the
internals to work with.
• (Small?) improvement over
In the 4.0 cycle, PLIP branches were merged in one 'big bang' after
our implementation review. It was a painful process last time, with 30
PLIPs I don't think it will realistically work this time.
Instead of a single deadline, I propose that we ask PLIP implementors
to submit their PLIP for
Le 18/08/10 07:39, Eric Steele a écrit :
• 10888 (Make KSS optional)
• Quick consensus
• Selenium testing
• KSS does this. Plone doesn't. Do we require plip to
add this for rewritten work?
Short: This plip is a chance for the FWT to
On 8/18/10 7:35 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Le 18/08/10 07:39, Eric Steele a écrit :
• 10888 (Make KSS optional)
• Quick consensus
• Selenium testing
• KSS does this. Plone doesn't. Do we require plip to
add this for rewritten work?
Hello,
• 10888 (Make KSS optional)
• Quick consensus
• Selenium testing
• KSS does this. Plone doesn't. Do we require plip
to add this for rewritten work?
Short: This plip is a chance for the FWT to give a strong push in the
right direction by REQUIRING
On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
• 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is twofold:
- There's a proliferation of half-solutions to this problem right
now. We need something blessed that people feel safe relying on. There
is a cost
On 19 August 2010 06:47, Geir Bækholt pl...@baekholt.com wrote:
On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
• 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is twofold:
- There's a proliferation of half-solutions to this problem right
now. We need something
On 19 August 2010 09:20, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 August 2010 06:47, Geir Bækholt pl...@baekholt.com wrote:
On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
• 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
I think my reason for wanting it in the core, is twofold:
- There's a
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 August 2010 09:20, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 August 2010 06:47, Geir Bækholt pl...@baekholt.com wrote:
On 18-08-2010 08.07, Martin Aspeli wrote:
• 10778 (Stand-alone UUID)
I
Hi Alec,
On 19 August 2010 09:52, Alec Mitchell ap...@columbia.edu wrote:
Though I voted against the inclusion of the UUID PLIP on it's own, if
the link-by-uuid PLIP makes good use of it, then it certainly could be
worth including.
I'd like to work with David to make sure that happens. It
11 matches
Mail list logo
