Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Alec Mitchell wrote:
>
> >I would say that anything that doesn't have something valuable ready
> >by the PLIP review deadline should probably only be allowed in at the
> >sole discretion of the release manager.
>
> +1, but isn't that the case with everything, any
Alec Mitchell wrote:
I would say that anything that doesn't have something valuable ready
by the PLIP review deadline should probably only be allowed in at the
sole discretion of the release manager.
+1, but isn't that the case with everything, anyway? Besides, I'm sure
Wiggy would want input
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> >>>http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/176 (visual redesign pending)
> >>If this is too invasive, it may be a bit risky and impact a lot of other
> >>PLIPs. If the changes are relatively minor or gra
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/117 (AJAX dep)
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/116 (AJAX dep)
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/163 (AJAX dep)
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/124 (AJAX dep)
All of these a
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/117 (AJAX dep)
> >http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/116 (AJAX dep)
> >http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/163 (AJAX dep)
> >http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/124 (AJAX dep)
>
> All of these are fair
On 8/22/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/117 (AJAX dep)
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/116 (AJAX dep)
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/163 (AJAX dep)
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/124 (AJAX dep)
All of the
Hi,
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/117 (AJAX dep)
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/116 (AJAX dep)
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/163 (AJAX dep)
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/124 (AJAX dep)
All of these are fairly obvious. There will naturally be tweaking and
Rocky Burt wrote:
On Tue, 2006-22-08 at 04:25 -0700, Alexander Limi wrote:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/175 (sleeper PLIP)
I would be willing to do at least some portion of this one as long as we
(read: Alec Mitchel and I) can get plone.app.form into shape and I can
use formlib-base
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:18:29 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Previously Alexander Limi wrote:
I'll see if I can cobble together a somewhat coherent PLIP (maybe with
Raphael) before that - but allowing a few extra days before this is
reviewed would be appreciated. I'm sure y
Previously Alexander Limi wrote:
> I'll see if I can cobble together a somewhat coherent PLIP (maybe with
> Raphael) before that - but allowing a few extra days before this is
> reviewed would be appreciated. I'm sure you'll have enough to do the first
> week of reviewing anyway. :)
You can
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:25:53 -0700, Alexander Limi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have gone through all the PLIPs that are targeting 3.0, marked them as
"in progress" if they have work that I know about, and pinged most of
the maintainers about the review bundle deadline this weekend.
...an
On Tue, 2006-22-08 at 04:25 -0700, Alexander Limi wrote:
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/175 (sleeper PLIP)
I would be willing to do at least some portion of this one as long as we
(read: Alec Mitchel and I) can get plone.app.form into shape and I can
use formlib-based configlets.
Comme
Sorry for the silly subject line, it's getting late :]
I have gone through all the PLIPs that are targeting 3.0, marked them as
"in progress" if they have work that I know about, and pinged most of the
maintainers about the review bundle deadline this weekend.
In addition, I have identified
13 matches
Mail list logo
