On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
sounds great to me, esp after having to manually install eight or
so packages for every new test site in the correct order for far
too long... :) so, i'm +1 for accepting the PLIP.
G
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
sounds great to me, esp after having to manually install eight or
so packages for every new test site in the correct order for far
too long... :) so, i'm +1 for accepting the PLIP.
Great! Perhaps it would be practical to select a spokesp
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Dear framework team,
I want to suggest PLIP 195 for inclusion in Plone 3.1. You can find the
full thing here: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/195.
sounds great to me, esp after having to manually install eigh
On Nov 26, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Dear framework team,
I want to suggest PLIP 195 for inclusion in Plone 3.1. You can find
the
full thing here: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/195.
sounds great to me, esp after having to manually install eight or so
packages fo
Dear framework team,
I want to suggest PLIP 195 for inclusion in Plone 3.1. You can find the
full thing here: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/195.
All implementation work has been done and no migrations are needed so
I feel that this would be a good candidate for 3.1.
Wichert.
--
Wiche