Diazo is only tested with the lxml HTML parser, I don't know what would
happen if you started parsing as XML.
Laurence
On 1 October 2013 08:22, Giacomo Spettoli giacomo.spett...@gmail.comwrote:
+1, I totally agree with this approach. I think it's the natural evolution
of rendering contents
I won't be able to make tonight's call either. Apologies, Laurence.
On Dec 13, 2011 7:27 PM, Martijn Pieters m...@zopatista.com wrote:
I'm sorry, but I won't be able to make it to today's conference call.
Hope you have a productive meeting!
--
Martijn Pieters
On 20 July 2011 20:25, Alex Limi l...@plone.org wrote:
Was asked to put this on your radar by Mozilla:
https://browserid.org/developers.html
I believe it's a better solution than stuff like OpenID for the average
user. Feedback (on both the approach, and whether we should add it to Plone)
Any chance of another release? I've just made a number of changes to
support Dexterity and also fixed a bug in setting the image
description.
Laurence
2011/2/10 Roel Bruggink r...@fourdigits.nl:
Eric, all,
I've released Products.TinyMCE 1.2.1 and 1.1.7. I've also edited the Plone
4.0 and 4.1
On 4 February 2011 17:45, Geir Bækholt pl...@baekholt.com wrote:
On 20-01-2011 16:57, Eric Steele wrote:
I'd like to get a final consensus on whether or not PLIP 9327 will be
included in 4.1. From discussion last week, several of you wanted to hold
out until we knew whether collections and
On 21 January 2011 17:54, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
Alec Mitchell ale...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Geir Bækholt pl...@baekholt.com wrote:
On 20-01-2011 16:57, Eric Steele wrote:
I'd like to get a final consensus on whether or not PLIP 9327 will be
On 20 January 2011 19:07, Alec Mitchell ale...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
I'd like to get a final consensus on whether or not PLIP 9327 will be
included in 4.1. From discussion last week,
On 13 September 2010 06:51, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Alexander Limi l...@plone.org wrote:
Do we expect Plone 4.1 / Zope 2.13 to be using Python 2.7 by default? (makes
sense to me, but not sure if it has other implications that I'm unaware of)
https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/buildouts/plone-coredev/branches/4.1/plips/plip10877-review-alecm.txt
* The PLIP buildout config has an explicit PIL egg dependency, which
doesn't appear to exist in the standard buildout. I find this
curious.
This is because Plone requires PIL but does not
On 6 September 2010 03:01, Sidnei da Silva
sidnei.da.si...@canonical.com wrote:
If I'm allowed to get one suggestion in there:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
snip
WSGI
Various components should be move out of Plone and into the WSGI
pipeline
On 5 September 2010 20:01, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 5 September 2010 19:17, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 September 2010 15:29, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
- Once we have intid's we can change the internal unique id of the
catalog from
With the release of Plone 4.0, I thought it would be useful to set out
my understanding of where we are headed with future releases. This
draws heavily on conversations with Hanno and focuses on
infrastructure rather than user visible changes.
The intention is to spark a discussion from which
On 24 August 2010 12:19, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 23 August 2010 18:18, Geir Bækholt · Jarn baekh...@jarn.com wrote:
On 23. aug. 2010, at 16:09, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
I've added
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10964
Motivation:
Search engines indexing your site and bots trawling for ASP/PHP
security holes can add a significant load to your site. Plone's 404
Not Found page is slow to render as it performs a catalogue search,
which exacerbates the problem.
Proposal
On 23 August 2010 18:18, Geir Bækholt · Jarn baekh...@jarn.com wrote:
On 23. aug. 2010, at 16:09, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
I've added downloading multiple files as a zip archive to the proposal.
Laurence
Isn't that really something completely different than mass uploading
In the 4.0 cycle, PLIP branches were merged in one 'big bang' after
our implementation review. It was a painful process last time, with 30
PLIPs I don't think it will realistically work this time.
Instead of a single deadline, I propose that we ask PLIP implementors
to submit their PLIP for
As an aid to our discussions, I've gone through the 4.1 Plips and
documented the dependencies here:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AiXg-nyMaQhedENVVllTbDhpb2p4ekU2aGZvd3FFVlEhl=enauthkey=CNj4jckN
Laurence
___
Framework-Team mailing list
On 16 August 2010 10:08, Matthew Wilkes matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk wrote:
On 2010-08-12, at 2042, Eric Steele wrote:
We've got 30 PLIPs in for 4.1 already
(http://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24), so it's time to get together and
start talking. Can I assume that next Tuesday at 14:00 UTC
On 9 August 2010 01:52, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 8 August 2010 20:33, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Hi.
My controlpanel PLIP 10359 (http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10359)
depends on someone else doing the base work of getting z3c.form into
4.1.
I've added a PLIP for separating out the optional dependencies from
Products.CMFPlone: https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10877
Laurence
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
There's quite a lot piling up in the changelog already, I think we're
ready for a release.
Tests pass, excepting the errors with PlonePAS (see other mail).
Laurence
3.3.6 - Unreleased
--
- Fix FactoryTool to mangle REQUEST.BASEn correctly. (Merged [36902]).
[elro]
- Fixed
I guess I'm -0 on renaming. If someone comes up with a great new name
then fine, but given it's one of the two hard problems in computer
science, I'm not holding my breath ;)
Laurence
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
On 15 March 2010 09:13, Alexander Limi l...@plone.org wrote:
2010/3/12 Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like
By my reading of the html 5 draft, it would seem conformant with the
(html5) spec to serve a document with a text/html Content-Type but an
XHTML Strict doctype.
On 16 March 2010 20:14, Alexander Limi l...@plone.org wrote:
What does transitional doctype have to do with geolocation?
(and XHTML
referred to as XHTML5 which is serving
it as XML, which isn't what we want to do)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
By my reading of the html 5 draft, it would seem conformant with the
(html5) spec to serve a document with a text/html Content-Type but an
XHTML
— it doesn't buy us anything.
The reason the HTML5 doctype is simply:
!DOCTYPE html
…is that it's the shortest possible string that will trigger
strict/standards parsing (ie. not quirks mode) in all browsers, including
IE6.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote
On 16 March 2010 23:37, Alexander Limi l...@plone.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
Unfortunately it's not possible to generate that from an xslt
processor / libxml2 / lxml, and in order to trigger the xhtml output
mode (so you get br
On 12 March 2010 01:24, Matthew Wilkes matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk wrote:
On 2010-03-09, at 0250, Eric Steele wrote:
So... now that those bums are out the door, how do we go about appointing
a 4.x team for me to abuse?
Well, on a more general note, I think we need a bit better separation
On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
...
- Well formed, valid XHTML (as a foundation for easier theming via xdv)
Just to note that xdv uses the HTMLParser which is really very
tolerant of badly formed markup (an
2010/1/6 Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net:
On 2010-01-05, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
A quick poll in #plone-framework showed that myself and Messrs. Glick and
Clark had never heard of bin/instance console. We need to document the
crap out of that.
I'm +1 on including plone.registry. I'm also +1 on including a
z3c.form as a dependency - with Zope 2.12 we won't need the whole
pinning pain required for use with. Zope 2.10.
Laurence
2009/8/14 Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Geir Bækholt wrote:
In our work on the
Ross Patterson wrote:
I think it's important that Plone has at least a welcome page when you
install it. Staring at a blank folder_listing is going to put off new
users. We can probably bet rid of the News and Events collections,
though.
I think I'd be opposed to removing the initial content,
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Personally I'd be in favor of extending the scope of Plone 4.0 to some
degree and making a clear commitment to allow quite a number of the
suggested features to be done in the scope of Plone 4.1, 4.2, ...
releases. Much of the work that makes up Plone trunk (5.0?) today
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 20 Jun 2009, at 20:54, Laurence Rowe wrote:
So if your PLIP isn't ready now, don't worry. There'll be another
chance to get it in with 4.1
With the usual caveat that 4.x releases are as ambitious as 3.x
releases. The reason we need a 4.0 release is so we can put
2009/1/2 Martin Aspeli optil...@gmx.net:
Tres Seaver wrote:
You can actually have multiple workflows for a given type. I may be the
only person who has ever actually used the feature, but it is truly
helpful at times.
I'd be interested to hear what kind of situations it's useful for?
Alec Mitchell wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 1:07 PM, Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:36 AM, Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inspired by Alec's plip #217, I'd like to propose making workflow
history/status storage fully pluggable.
http://plone.org/products/roadmap
Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
On 13 dec 2007, at 08:41, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Tom Lazar wrote:
On 11.12.2007, at 13:35, Laurence Rowe wrote:
I'd like to see the following for 3.1:
#210: Improve UI support for objects on multiple workflows
DCWorkflow allows for a chain of workflows
I'd like to see the following for 3.1:
#210: Improve UI support for objects on multiple workflows
DCWorkflow allows for a chain of workflows to be specified for a type.
This mostly works with Plone, but there are a few (mostly UI) warts to
be fixed. http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/210
Raphael Ritz wrote:
snip/
On a related note: let's not forget that one of the strong points of
Zope/Plone has always been the possibility to do many things
TTW from a browser. In many real life situations, site admins don't
have file system access to the server deploying their site which
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Geir Bækholt · Plone Solutions wrote:
On 9. mar. 2007, at 17.22, Laurence Rowe wrote:
I would vote for keeping the base tag anyway, as it would make the
site not break if someone makes a wrong link somewhere.
Another possibility to help this would be to make all
Geir Bækholt · Plone Solutions wrote:
On 6. mar. 2007, at 01.23, Martin Aspeli wrote:
My point in the bug thread is that I *think* the solution is to make
sure slashing of links is always consistent: if it's folderish, put /
at the end, if not, don't.
I can confirm that the solution is to
41 matches
Mail list logo
