Re: PLIP 168 feedback (and fixes) was Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-12-27 Thread Tom Lazar
On Nov 18, 2006, at 11:43 PM, Tom Lazar wrote: there is still one issue that needs to be addressed IMHO. i've also filed an issue for that: http://plone.org/products/iterate/issues/10 basically, it means that references to children of an iterated folderish object are broken after that obje

PLIP 168 feedback (and fixes) was Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-11-18 Thread Tom Lazar
hi guys, i've been doing some work with iterate for a project here and wanted to report back, as some of the issues raised here came up for me, too. for compatability reasons i've been working with the `0.3- plone-2.1-2.5` branch, but kapil has already incorporated some of my fixes into t

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Martin Aspeli
Alexander Limi wrote: On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:06:59 -0700, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: They do, and the decision has not been made yet, partially due to this. However, it is fairly telling that we've now got two dedicated core developers regularly improving the KSS bundle in re

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:06:59 -0700, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: They do, and the decision has not been made yet, partially due to this. However, it is fairly telling that we've now got two dedicated core developers regularly improving the KSS bundle in response to feedback, a

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On 10/5/06, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [.. long list ..] Thank you in advance for filing those at http://plone.org/products/cmfeditions/issues ;) They are iterate issues, and they have already been "filed" with Kapil. ;) — Alexander __

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Martin Aspeli
Alexander Limi wrote: On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:12:54 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This does need some more disucssion, but I also considered it important to at least give some signal to indicate in which direction the consensus seems to be going. It might even get Ben to fi

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 10/5/06, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Previously Alexander Limi wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:53:06 -0700, Wichert Akkerman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PLIP 168 - integrate iterate for checkin/checkout/staging > > > > Viewing a locked front page gave an error until t

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Alexander Limi wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:53:06 -0700, Wichert Akkerman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PLIP 168 - integrate iterate for checkin/checkout/staging > > > > Viewing a locked front page gave an error until the page was checked > > in. > > I was working with a

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:53:06 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PLIP 168 - integrate iterate for checkin/checkout/staging Viewing a locked front page gave an error until the page was checked in. I was working with a customer, deploying iterate and CMFEditions earlier

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:12:54 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The other thing that's not here is the new workflows that Vincenzo said he'd look at. There's no bundle, but it's just a set of new workflows + possibly a control panel. This is also quite important - Plone's OOTB

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:12:54 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This does need some more disucssion, but I also considered it important to at least give some signal to indicate in which direction the consensus seems to be going. It might even get Ben to fix the Bling bundle...