Hi Steve,
Steve McMahon schrieb:
Here's a draft for a public policy statement. I invite feedback and
wordsmithing.
Thanks for writing the draft. I've only 2 comments.
1. I saw different working names for the policy and I think it should be
something obvious like Plone [Version] Support
Wichert Akkerman schrieb:
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Unless anyone can make a case for re-evaluation, I hope we can take a
common line on this in discussions in the other lists. In particular,
we should be careful in any statement that Plone 2.5.x is unsupported
to make sure that this only
Hi Wichert,
Wichert Akkerman schrieb:
Previously Carsten Senger wrote:
[...]
(supposable)
Series Release Date
2.53.x4.x
Release
2.5 M - - Sep 2006
3.0 M M - Aug
Hanno Schlichting schrieb:
While everyone is waiting for Plone 4 and its rather long timeline, some
people have been thinking about how to bridge the gap between the
current stable 3.x releases and the future.
The general idea that seems to have met some consensus is to go for a
Plone 3.5
Hanno Schlichting schrieb:
Hi.
To summarize the feedback from the European time zone, I think that the
proposal in general meets the favor of everyone.
The controversial issue is the exact version number to use for the
release. There seems to be broad support for freeing the current Plone
Hi Steve,
Steve McMahon schrieb:
Here's a draft for a public policy statement. I invite feedback and
wordsmithing.
I've seen that the version support policy is now published on
plone.org[1] and the minutes from the last pf meeting that approved
it[2]. I think it's a good idea to announce
Alexander Limi schrieb:
On Sun, 10 May 2009 23:36:41 -0700, Raphael Ritz raphael.r...@incf.org
wrote:
Or, even easier: use our underlying technologies
theming capabilities and simply ship with two themes. ;-)
Good point. :)
Make the new one the default for new sites but leave
existing
Hi all,
the Implementation for PLIP 9321: Reimplement the search form with an eye
on usability
is ready for review.
Plip ticket: https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9321
(Note: The final Proposal is
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9321#comment:10)
Hi Francesco,
--On Freitag, August 21, 2009 18:30:45 +0200 Francesco Ciriaci
francesco.ciri...@gmail.com wrote:
The main 9315 PLIP for sure. I'm also interested in the 9321 (search),
9288 (commenting) and 9295 (collections).
I did not have time to polish the ui for #9321 before the
Hi Wichert,
--On Donnerstag, September 10, 2009 16:27:14 +0200 Wichert Akkerman
wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
[...]
class IInformationLink(Interface):
A link to more information related to a risk.
url = schema.URI(
title = _(uURL),
required = True)
Hi all,
--On Donnerstag, Oktober 01, 2009 09:13:01 +0200 Kim Chee leong
le...@goldmund-wyldebeast-wunderliebe.com wrote:
Hello framework team,
Today is the final implementation deadline for the PLIPs. I'm working
on PLIP 9311 'Clean up user related actions'. I would like to request
a postpone
11 matches
Mail list logo
