Hanno Schlichting
writes:
>> So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower circles to
>> free it up for prototyping, visioning, and imagining new approaches.
>> This has been in part to isolate such a process from the paralysis that
>> can come from discussion of edge cases or disagre
Ross Patterson wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting
> writes:
>
> Four of us (calvinhp, ErikRose, ErikRose, zenwryly) made it to the
> meeting and came up with a few things to act on. I'll briefly describe
> them here so we can discuss.
Awesome!
> Some of the discussion centered around possible changes
Thanks for the excellent summary!
Previously Ross Patterson wrote:
> The last item concerned future meetings. When should we do this meeting
> in the future? Every other week or every third work? Thursday?
> Friday? Would all of the FWT members weigh in with both preferences and
> outright sch
Hanno Schlichting
writes:
> Thanks for taking the initiative here.
>
> I'll not gonna make it to todays tune-up nor the conf call, though :(
Four of us (calvinhp, ErikRose, ErikRose, zenwryly) made it to the
meeting and came up with a few things to act on. I'll briefly describe
them here so we
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi Calvin.
Thanks for taking the initiative here.
I'll not gonna make it to todays tune-up nor the conf call, though :(
Same for me :-(
But I'm delighted to see this happening.
[..]
In my dual role of release manager and major code contributer I have
payed to
Hi Calvin.
Thanks for taking the initiative here.
I'll not gonna make it to todays tune-up nor the conf call, though :(
Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
> The next one is this Friday and I'd suggest that we meet at 17:00 GMT.
> I'll send out Yugma conference info so we can share desktops if needed
