Laurence Rowe wrote:
[..]
I don't think we'll persuade libxml2 to implement it the as xhtml output until the standard is
finalised, it's already been changed from in the last few months.
More on this here.
http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/xslt-and-html-5-problems
I'm probably mi
On 16 March 2010 23:37, Alexander Limi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately it's not possible to generate that from an xslt
>> processor / libxml2 / lxml, and in order to trigger the xhtml output
>> mode (so you get with the space) you need to specif
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> Unfortunately it's not possible to generate that from an xslt
> processor / libxml2 / lxml, and in order to trigger the xhtml output
> mode (so you get with the space) you need to specify an xhtml
> 1.0 doctype to be output. It seems quite
Unfortunately it's not possible to generate that from an xslt
processor / libxml2 / lxml, and in order to trigger the xhtml output
mode (so you get with the space) you need to specify an xhtml
1.0 doctype to be output. It seems quite likely with deco / blocks /
xdv that we will have an lxml based
Right, I don't see a reason to do that, though — it doesn't buy us anything.
The reason the HTML5 doctype is simply:
…is that it's the shortest possible string that will trigger
strict/standards parsing (ie. not quirks mode) in all browsers, including
IE6.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Lau
It is listed as an "obsolete permitted doctype string"
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#obsolete-permitted-doctype-string
- i.e. we can lie about the doctype. I'm not sure why xhtml 1.0
transitional is not allowed.
Laurence
On 16 March 2010 22:18, Alexander Limi wrote:
> The way it wor
The way it works is that you can use the XHTML "spelling" (ie. closing your
tags), but you serve it up as normal HTML.
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Should_I_close_empty_elements_with_.2F.3E_or_.3E.3F
There's no Strict or similar thing in HTML5, AFAIK.
(There is also something informally refer
By my reading of the html 5 draft, it would seem conformant with the
(html5) spec to serve a document with a text/html Content-Type but an
XHTML Strict doctype.
On 16 March 2010 20:14, Alexander Limi wrote:
> What does transitional doctype have to do with geolocation?
>
> (and XHTML STRICT is a p
What does transitional doctype have to do with geolocation?
(and XHTML STRICT is a problem, since it implies serving with XML MIME type,
which IE doesn't handle, so that's unlikely to happen)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Veda Williams wrote:
> This brings up the question of when we're mov
On 3/16/10 18:40 , Alexander Limi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Wichert Akkerman mailto:wich...@wiggy.net>> wrote:
I'ld like to see a list of pros and cons of using HTML 5 as well. I
am quite worried by the lack of proper support in existing browsers.
None of them implement
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I'ld like to see a list of pros and cons of using HTML 5 as well. I am
> quite worried by the lack of proper support in existing browsers. None of
> them implement any of the existing HTML standards properly, and I fear that
> switching t
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I'ld like to see a list of pros and cons of using HTML 5 as well. I am
> quite worried by the lack of proper support in existing browsers. None of
> them implement any of the existing HTML standards properly, and I fear that
> switching t
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I'ld like to see a list of pros and cons of using HTML 5 as well. I am quite
> worried by the lack of proper support in existing browsers. None of them
> implement any of the existing HTML standards properly, and I fear that
> switching t
On 3/16/10 12:34 , Laurence Rowe wrote:
On 15 March 2010 09:13, Alexander Limi wrote:
2010/3/12 Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
...
- Well formed, val
On 15 March 2010 09:13, Alexander Limi wrote:
> 2010/3/12 Hanno Schlichting
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>> > On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> >> Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
>> > ...
>> >> - Well formed, valid XHTML (as a fou
On Mar 15, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Nate Aune wrote:
> What about Amberjack for self-guided tours/help?
> http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9324
>
> Is that still on the roadmap for landing in Plone 4.1?
It certainly is if someone resubmits it. I asked the implementers to continue
developing it outsi
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Nate Aune wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Hanno Schlichting
> wrote:
>>
>> - ... tons of new or better features
>
> What about Amberjack for self-guided tours/help?
> http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9324
The entire list is at http://dev.plone.org/plo
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
>
> - Include plone.app.registry
> - Include z3c.form
> - Improved commenting infrastructure
> - Improving the event type with recurrence, etc.
> - New roles : Webmaster/site administrator
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Alexander Limi wrote:
> We could also take a page from how Firefox is looking to change their
> release management strategy, ie. landing stuff that has only infrastructural
> impact in a 4.x release (out-of-process plugins in FF's example, which will
> land in the
2010/3/12 Hanno Schlichting
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> > On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> >> Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
> > ...
> >> - Well formed, valid XHTML (as a foundation for easier theming via xdv)
>
> That's really go
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
> ...
>> - Well formed, valid XHTML (as a foundation for easier theming via xdv)
>
> Just to note that xdv uses the HTMLParser which is reall
On 12 March 2010 15:07, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Currently listed for Plone 4.x are things like:
...
> - Well formed, valid XHTML (as a foundation for easier theming via xdv)
Just to note that xdv uses the HTMLParser which is really very
tolerant of badly formed markup (an earlier problem with
22 matches
Mail list logo
