Technically it's possible -- Eyemo flange to focal distance is 1.5" and Nikon
is 46.5mm -- but it would have to slide internally into the Eyemo mount, and
most
Nikon lenses have a shroud around the rear element (and preset levers) that
will get in the way.
An aside: when Nikon introduced their SL
On Mar 8, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Peter Mudie wrote:
> or a South Australian winery.
Near Adelaide?
Jeff Kreines
Kinetta
j...@kinetta.com
kinetta.com
kinettaarchival.com
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5
On Mar 8, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
Calkvsky and “next to nothing” in the same sentence? Really?
He’s legendary on eBay for prices that make one ask what he/she is smoking.
haha ha
so true!
Apparently he is right here in Petaluma.
And one could assume that Petaluma isn't an oute
On Mar 8, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
> Calkvsky and “next to nothing” in the same sentence? Really?
>
> He’s legendary on eBay for prices that make one ask what he/she is smoking.
>
haha ha
so true!
Apparently he is right here in Petaluma.
> http://www.ebay.com/sch/calkovskycame
That is being hard on Chambless!
Look here. Filled with both misinformation and ridiculous prices. (I like the
movement for the “hand-cranked” Wall camera — given that the Wall was a 35mm
single-system sound camera.)
http://www.calkovsky.com
On Mar 8, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Yes! I think I got a 21mm fixed-focus Wollensak from him for $10, and
a 135mm Miltar for $20. He seemed like a good fellow. Is he another
Chambless?
--scott
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com
Calkvsky and “next to nothing” in the same sentence? Really?
He’s legendary on eBay for prices that make one ask what he/she is smoking.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/calkovskycameraco/m.html?item=271225691566&pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f264f9dae&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562
On Mar 8, 2014, at 5
It is possible to mount a Nikon lens on the Eyemo without machining away
the existing mount and JUST BARELY have it focus to infinity.
However, Calkovsky Camera and Lens at 707-658-2628 has a vast array of
original new-in-box Eyemo lenses selling for next to nothing and I would
recommend just buyi
You could take one of these:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/GENUINE-Nikon-BR-3-Mount-Adapter-Ring-52mm-/131128538449?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e87deb551
(many similar items around)
and get Ken Stone (http://www.stonecinemaengineering.com/services.html) to
adapt it. He put Nikon mounts on a 35mm
Google “eyemo nikon mount” — lots of stuff shows up.
On Mar 8, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
> There are people who have made a replacement front plate for the Eyemo with a
> Nikon mount on it. Not that difficult for a good machinist. You could also
> start out with a single-hole Eye
I think when using Dektol developer the following would be the proper times and
procedures for processing Tri X as a reversal. As mentioned I use D19 developer
myself and my times are different so run tests first.
Developer 7 minuteswash 1 minutebleach 4 minuteswash 1 minuteClear bath 30
seconds
There are people who have made a replacement front plate for the Eyemo with a
Nikon mount on it. Not that difficult for a good machinist. You could also
start out with a single-hole Eyemo front plate, machine off the Eyemo mount and
attach a Nikon mount (with the right flange focal distance) t
Hello everybodyI just bought an Eyemo and I was wondering if any of you have
ever heard of a Nikon to Eyemo mount adapter ? or have any thought on what to
do about lenses.
thank you very muchJB ___
FrameWorks mailing
Here's a relatively old projector spec and already it specifies that h264
compression in an .mov or .mp4 container are supported. That's close to
optimal except maybe in Linux; you might give those profiles a shot.
http://www.optomausa.com/support/discontinued-products/detail/ml500
On Mar 8, 2014
Mpeg2 should also be ok.
On Mar 8, 2014 11:06 AM, "Mark Street" wrote:
> Hey Sisters and Brothers,
> I'm installing a three channel video installation now, and have forgotten
> all I once knew about getting projectors to loop images. Any help would be
> much appreciated.
>
> In the past, I had a
You can still get a T-Max kit from Photographers Formulary in the US:
http://stores.photoformulary.com/reversal-developer-for-t-max/ It's listed as
"developer" but contains the bleach as well.
- Stefan Grabowski
From: rogerdwil...@sympatico.ca
To: jihalp...@yahoo.com; frameworks@jonasmekasfilm
I think Kodak discontinued making the T-max kit a few years back, which is one
of the reasons why I process as a negative and then make my prints using kodak
7203 print stock. But you can still process as a reversal and there are recipes
out there to make your own bleach for reversal processing.
Here's a guide to processing as reversal using a T-Max kit:
http://www.ralphdickinson.com/process_site/allpages.html
Can you provide us with a little background here? For example, as Roger put,
reversal or negative? Anything special you're looking for in developing, or as
"clean" an image as po
Hey Sisters and Brothers,
I'm installing a three channel video installation now, and have forgotten
all I once knew about getting projectors to loop images. Any help would be
much appreciated.
In the past, I had a hard time determining which projectors would accept
which thumbdrives, and which fi
There is a forgotten story inside in a famous crime story of Hitchcock's
Rear Window.
If you like Hitchcock's movies,
check out:
https://vimeo.com/88425055
This is a study of filmic narration for my students and a footnote to
Bordwell
Thanks
Péter Lichter
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
