THIS point about the stocks, above all.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 14, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Toni-Lynn Frederick
> wrote:
>
> ...Also, correct me if I’m wrong, but is it not the case that, with the
> creation of this camera, comes the guarantee of continued stock production —
> or at lea
The link between the film and digital world doesn't happen in camera. It
happens in the lab. The key is to offer lab services where you can drop your
film off and get a file back promptly and cleanly.
Kodak -is- trying to do that and that's a good thing, but that service works
just as well with
It's true, Jeff. But... maybe we'll be getting some E-6 stock from Ferrania
in the next couple years, and then you can get that look with Super-8 or
even (for really not much more operating cost) 16mm.
And... if the trust-fund hipster market keeps Kodak open a little bit longer
while they can fig
Hello
Maybe I’m a lone voice on this forum, but I’m actually quite excited about
Kodak’s new Super 8 film camera, and I find it somewhat disappointing to read
so much negativity about an attempt to offer a new Super 8 film camera to a
digital world.
I’ve hardly drank the Kokak Kool-Aid, but i
Super 8 has an aesthetic based on reversal film, shot with little cameras one
holds against their eye.
Color neg in Super 8 just looks like bad 16mm, IMHO. And if it costs $100 to
process and scan 2.5 minutes of film, not including the raw stock, it's cheaper
to shoot 16mm, including processi
If they are interested in conspicuous crud in the gate, we can rent
Mr. Snoot The Amazing Yeti Cat for very reasonable rates. He just
wants the occasional cat treat.
--scott
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5
It seems to be targeted at digital videomakers (including the Hollywood
directors that Dave Tetzlaff named) who want that "super 8 look" including
conspicuous crud in the gate.
John Porter, Toronto, Canada
On Thu, 7/13/17, Dave Tetzlaff wrote:
Subj
Which specific Bolex Reflex viewfinder are you referring too, Scott?
My regular and UltraPan8 Bolex 13x Reflex viewfinders provide a crisp
clear image. Not as bright as the later Aaton and Arri viewfinders but
quite good considering it's prism based.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Scott Dorsey
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23eNNss0ZFY
I hate to say it, but this most looks very soft, even for Super-8, although
there are a couple shots here and there (like at 1:35) that are okay. I don't
know if that's because the digital finder makes it hard to focus accurately
or if the lens they p
Predictable negativity not withstandinghere are two recent test
shots with the new Logmar designed Kodak Super 8 camera, i.e.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bq1vP0viRO8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23eNNss0ZFY
I have the original Logmar prototype Super 8 camera that the new Kodak
S8 cam i
Hi all -
I know that Kodak has a couple of prototypes of the new Super8 digital but they
are - as of January - not yet available for "trying out." But should be soon.
to offer a little clarification on the film developing with digital angle
through Pro8mm in Burbank (Kodak's suggested deve
Thanks for the input. A local art school was curious about it and I wanted
to ask around, since I know nothing about this hybrid model and its
expenses.
thanks!
meg
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Kodak Super8 digital camera (Margaret Rorison)
>2. Re: Kodak Super8 digital camera (Jeff Kreine
That youtube teat footage , It says- ''Comments are disabled for this
video'' He he oh well.
2017-07-14 4:07 GMT-04:00 j miner :
> it will be released by winter i imagine.
> i think it will be better than the chinon
> bellami hd 1
> also it will not make you bitter inside
>
>
> On Thursday, J
it will be released by winter i imagine.
i think it will be better than the chinon
bellami hd 1
also it will not make you bitter inside
On Thursday, July 13, 2017, Dave Tetzlaff wrote:
> > Mindless design. No optical viewfinder, just a flip out video screen.
> Plus, it is overpriced.
>
> The pro
14 matches
Mail list logo
