Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-26 Thread Sean Weitzel
Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:54:02 +0100 >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa >>> Hey Dan, >>> Wittner repackaged Agfa's stock, so it's exactly the same stuff. >>> This was originally designed for arial photography, perhaps for >>> mapm

Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-26 Thread Sean Weitzel
it's >> hard to judge due to different types of footage and transfer qualities.. >> I'm interested in using it for optical printing and maybe in-camera... >> Hand-developing if I get ambitious. >> >> And for extra credit.. Anyone ever try using Kodak 3383 print

Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-25 Thread Amanda Thomson
ry using Kodak 3383 print stock in a > camera? > > Thanks!! > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Pip Chodorov > To: Experimental Film Discussion List > Cc: > Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:54:02 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner v

Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-24 Thread Herb Theriault
Reasonably sure Richard Tuohy uses 3383 quite a bit. I've been wanting to pick some up ever since taking one of his workshops a few years ago. The low iso gives it a fair amount of flexibility for bi-packing and related fun things. On January 23, 2017 3:21:08 PM AST, Ryder White wrote: >Hey Dan

Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-24 Thread Petehumble
Hi, I've hand processed a few rolls too. I have to say I was pretty disappointed in the result. Seemed super grainy to me but my quality control is also non existent. Peter > On 24 Jan 2017, at 4:48 AM, Dan Anderson wrote: > > Hey all, > > Wondering if there are any E6 color reversal enthu

Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-23 Thread Ryder White
Hey Dan, I've shot and processed a few rolls of the Agfa aviphot and like Pip says hand processing in E6 is very doable. I found it to be a pretty tolerant stock for that, but then again my QC is not very exacting so take that with a grain of salt. I know of a few people who have used 3383 as a c

Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-23 Thread Scott Dorsey
I think the Wittner and Agfa films are the same film off of one big jumbo that was released a couple years back. When it is gone it is likely gone. 3383 is very slow but if you can stand one or two seconds per frame it could be interesting. --scott ___

Re: [Frameworks] 16mm E6 - Wittner vs. Agfa

2017-01-23 Thread Pip Chodorov
Hey Dan, Wittner repackaged Agfa's stock, so it's exactly the same stuff. This was originally designed for arial photography, perhaps for mapmaking or topography. Therefore it has a certain look and is especially receptive to green. I doubt it will look good in the optical printer (you will need