Hello Chris,
Thursday, September 28, 2000, 02:30:27, you wrote:
CK large catalogs of music. The tree helps, but when some audiofile with
that's audiophile, OK ?!?! :)
we are talking audiophiles here...
CK alot of money rips his 1000 cds, he needs a search prompt as well. So
CK it is worth
i'll help test it under windows.
elrod
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
My changes to Metadata to use the HashStore for string storage
are far enough along to start thinking about getting someone else
to help test it.
[ Insert usual many shallow buggy eyes comment ]
If I hear from any volunteers,
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 17:47:04, you wrote:
CK My changes to Metadata to use the HashStore for string storage
CK are far enough along to start thinking about getting someone else
CK to help test it.
(sorry, haven't looked at it or compiled freeamp lately somehow - it's
too
FreeAmp really does have too large of a memory footprint. It is a shame
that the STL strings are such memory hogs. I think it is worth seeing how
big of an improvement his suggestion can bring. If it is not that much of
an improvement we drop itright? If it is a big improvement we can all
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Mark B. Elrod wrote:
FreeAmp really does have too large of a memory footprint. It is a shame
that the STL strings are such memory hogs. I think it is worth seeing how
big of an improvement his suggestion can bring. If it is not that much of
an improvement we drop
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 11:28:32PM +0300, Valters Vingolds wrote:
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 17:47:04, you wrote:
CK My changes to Metadata to use the HashStore for string storage
CK are far enough along to start thinking about getting someone else
CK to help test it.
