Edric Edric wrote:
> I did something similar. I did some work just for myself that extended
> the artist/album/track paradigm to let users specify all the orders they
> want (album/track, or artist/year/track, or I even extended it to
> composer/artist/album/track (absolutely necessary if you
#x27;ll send you
my code changes.
By the way, it ends up being a huge memory pig, but at least it lets you
slice your music the way you want it.
>From: Valters Vingolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: musicbrowser improvemen
* Valters Vingolds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'd like all those artists to disappear and instead see those 10-20 CD
> titles.
One kludgy way around this is to mess with the id3 tags so that the CD name
appears in the Artist field--this sucks in many ways, but it sorta works.
--
.michael le
I don't care - I probably will develop it even if it's only for me.
I am quite tired of those hundreds of one-song artists that show up in
musicbrowser tree. If you have some 10-20 techno/house collection CD's
you might know what I am talking about. That's some major "one hit
group" subculture.
hi.
I have been thinking about one particular feature that I would like to
see in musicbrowser. It's about the "My Music" tree view of the MP3.
The tree is constructed of "Artist/Album/Song name" hierarchy. What I
would like to do, I'd like to create second pass for to filter the mp3
db to de
Hm. Basically, don't plan on anything like this changing/being accepted
until after the 2.1 release.. And actually, changes like this might not really
be worth the effort, unless we decide to do a 2.2 release instead of just
starting on 3.0 as I'm hoping..
Isaac
On 21-Feb-2001 Valters Vingold
