RE: panics due to buggy ACPI in Dell Latitude E6530?

2013-02-28 Thread Moore, Robert
> ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node > 0xfe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) Sorry, could not reproduce the problem here: - ex _SB_.BAT0._UID Evaluating \_SB_.BAT0._UID Evaluation of \_SB_.BAT0._UID returned object 000342A0, external buffer length

Re: panics due to buggy ACPI in Dell Latitude E6530?

2013-02-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 28/02/2013 17:44 Moore, Robert said the following: >> ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node >> 0xfe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) > > Sorry, could not reproduce the problem here: > > > - ex _SB_.BAT0._UID > Evaluating \_SB_.BAT0._UID > Evaluatio

Re: Fixing X220 Video The Right Way

2013-02-28 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:15:46 am matt wrote: > On 02/27/13 12:27, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:35:43 pm matt wrote: > >> On 02/27/13 09:00, John Baldwin wrote: > >>> If that is true, it's because your BIOS is lying. Do you have a URL to > >>> your ASL lying aro

Re: panics due to buggy ACPI in Dell Latitude E6530?

2013-02-28 Thread kron
On 2013/02/28 16:44, Moore, Robert wrote: >> ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node >> 0xfe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) > > Sorry, could not reproduce the problem here: > > > - ex _SB_.BAT0._UID > Evaluating \_SB_.BAT0._UID > Evaluation of \_SB_.B

Re: panics due to buggy ACPI in Dell Latitude E6530?

2013-02-28 Thread kron
On 2013/02/28 17:38, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/02/2013 17:44 Moore, Robert said the following: >>> ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node >>> 0xfe00094a51c0), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) >> >> Sorry, could not reproduce the problem here: >> >> >> - ex _SB_.BAT

Re: ACPI locking bugs?

2013-02-28 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Wednesday 27 February 2013 14:28:12 Jung-uk Kim wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2013-02-27 08:53:43 -0500, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What is the reason for using cv_wait_sig() and cv_timedwait_sig() > > instead of cv_wait() and cv_timedwait() in