TECTED],
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Betreff: Re: CDROM-Artwork
> On 2006.10.27 10:16:01 +0200, Joel Dahl wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:45 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > > On 2006.10.26 23:33:58 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > > Than
On 2006.10.27 10:16:01 +0200, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:45 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > On 2006.10.26 23:33:58 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > Thanks very much Peer, and apologies for both the run-around and for
> > > consistently spelling your name wrong.
> > >
> > > Deb,
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:45 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2006.10.26 23:33:58 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > Thanks very much Peer, and apologies for both the run-around and for
> > consistently spelling your name wrong.
> >
> > Deb, thanks for checking this out.
> >
> > www@, I need a decis
On 2006.10.26 23:33:58 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> Thanks very much Peer, and apologies for both the run-around and for
> consistently spelling your name wrong.
>
> Deb, thanks for checking this out.
>
> www@, I need a decision on the CVS thing please.
I think files > 1MB doesn't belong in CVS a
Thanks very much Peer, and apologies for both the run-around and for
consistently spelling your name wrong.
Deb, thanks for checking this out.
www@, I need a decision on the CVS thing please.
Ceri
.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:52:38AM +0200, Peer Schaefer wrote:
> OK, here is the revised material
.
Best regards,
Peer
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2006 06:53
An: Peer Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Betreff: Re: CDROM-Artwork
> On 23 Oct 2006 at 6:52, Peer Schaefer wrote:
>
> > OK,
On 23 Oct 2006 at 6:52, Peer Schaefer wrote:
> OK, here is the revised material. Indeed, it was pain, and I wished
> somebody told me earlier. But, as Peter Jackson once said, "pain is
> temporary, BSD is forever" (or did he say "film is forever"? -- I can't
> remember... Must go to bed now...)
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> [Trimmed Cc list.]
>
> Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > 2, Page 1899 has it all capitals. All through the book, the .rof
> > macro generating the automatic footer does it as caps. Bell sold
> > Unix through a tedious chain of companies to whoever owns it this week.
>
[Trimmed Cc list.]
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> 2, Page 1899 has it all capitals. All through the book, the .rof
> macro generating the automatic footer does it as caps. Bell sold
> Unix through a tedious chain of companies to whoever owns it this week.
Well, the chain isn't that long and
Dear Oliver,
Thank you for setting me straight. It wasn't my place to assume the
requirements for proper UNIX attribution. I based my comment on what our
lawyer recommended for our trademarks. And, I realize now, this is not
standard protocol.
When using the FreeBSD mark, as outlined in item
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Deb Goodkin wrote:
> > [...]
> > 2. In the description on the back of the DVD case and CD sleeve, only
> > use the "r in circle" for the first use of the FreeBSD mark. You can
> > probably do the same with Unix.
>
> No, that will be insufficient. It is required to add
Deb Goodkin wrote:
> [...]
> 2. In the description on the back of the DVD case and CD sleeve, only
> use the "r in circle" for the first use of the FreeBSD mark. You can
> probably do the same with Unix.
No, that will be insufficient. It is required to add an
attribution, according to The O
OK, here is the revised material. Indeed, it was pain, and I wished
somebody told me earlier. But, as Peter Jackson once said, "pain is
temporary, BSD is forever" (or did he say "film is forever"? -- I can't
remember... Must go to bed now...).
Anyway, here are the links:
Full scale artwork (3
The Foundation can provide a document to Peer to sign over copyright
ownership to the Foundation. I have some input on the design regarding
proper attribution of trademarks.
1. Please add a TM next to the logo. It should be on the upper right,
below the ear. When the logo is right next to the
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:50:48AM +0200, Peer Schaefer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have designed some CDROM-related artwork for FreeBSD (CDROM-labels,
> sleeves and DVD-cases). The first drafts were posted to the
> FreeBSD-advocacy-mailing-list on Sept 1st, and since then I have
> received some kind fe
On 16 Oct 2006 at 10:50, Peer Schaefer wrote:
> If you find this artwork useful, I will also create "6.2" versions for
> the upcoming release.
I think you should create versions for 6.2. For me, I'd use them for
the CDs I give away. I can see user groups using them as well. It's
much better
My intention is to give the copyright away to the FreeBSD project and
let THEM publish the stuff on THEIR website. Since they don't need a
permission from themselves, there will be no problem ;-)
But -- at the moment -- the "legal status" of my artwork-project is
somehow questionable. It depen
Peer Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It was not my intention to "publish" any artwork that uses FreeBSD
> trademarks and Anton Gurals artwork without due permission. But there
> has to be a way to share drafts with the community before I petition
> the webmaster to upload it to the FreeBSD-w
On 10/13/06 04:50, Peer Schaefer wrote:
This is not too easy... ;-)
In the past I received some complaints about posting long lists of links
and was asked to provide a HTML (and thus keep my mailings short). But
it seems that there is no consenus regarding these matters in the
mailing-list (s
This is not too easy... ;-)
In the past I received some complaints about posting long lists of links
and was asked to provide a HTML (and thus keep my mailings short). But
it seems that there is no consenus regarding these matters in the
mailing-list (see Dag-Erlings posting below).
Anyway,
Peer Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For a quick look here are some thumbnails:
>
> http://www.wolldingwacht.de/foss/freebsd/files_list.html
>
> (this URL is "secret"; no artwork is published by me at this time)
This "secret" URL is now archived on hundreds of web sites and indexed
by Googl
So, I did a little research (FreeBSD handbook, Google, Wikipedia).
If I am not wrong, Alpha, AMD64, IA-64 and PC-98x1 are no trademarks at
all (somehow surprising, especially for AMD64). i386 and PowerPC are
trademarks or at least claimed as such (somehow questionable for "i386"
'cause numbers
Hi Remko,
no, you are not nagging ;-) Feedback is always welcome, and thanks for
pointing at this important issue.
I don't agree with you fully, since I didn't USE the trademarks; I only
REFERRED to them. USING them would require a license; REFERRING to them
is free (disturbingly, REFERRING
2006/10/8, Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think they're great. I have some work to do on the art page anyway,
so if there are no objections from anyone else then I'd love to
incorporate these.
I don't believe that I have a tool to edit SVGs; is there any chance
that you could update these t
Peer Schaefer wrote:
Hi Ceri,
SVGs can be easily edited with opensource tools like Inkscape or
Sodipodi.
Said this, I would be very happy to post new versions for each
release. If there are no objections to the versions I posted, I will
just adjust them.
Do you think there would also be in
Hi Ceri,
SVGs can be easily edited with opensource tools like Inkscape or Sodipodi.
Said this, I would be very happy to post new versions for each release.
If there are no objections to the versions I posted, I will just adjust
them.
Do you think there would also be interest in a "box-design"
I think they're great. I have some work to do on the art page anyway,
so if there are no objections from anyone else then I'd love to
incorporate these.
I don't believe that I have a tool to edit SVGs; is there any chance
that you could update these to say 6.2 rather than 6.1? That way we can
us
27 matches
Mail list logo
