On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:21:54PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and
contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it
all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-)
Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
crypto distribution as long as we have one.
Is it? I thought the RSAref code being pluggable gave it some
protection, or is merely "pluggability" also classified as crypto?
I do recall someone saying something to that
On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:08:23 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
Check it out at:
http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with
lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include langinfo.h, which FreeBSD
doesn't have.
I've integrated NetBSD's
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
I've integrated NetBSD's langinfo and nl_types support into FreeBSD. I
can send you patches if you haven't managed to work around this yet?
Great. Please send me the patches. BTW, by "integrated", do you mean
that you've integrated them into the
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Bush Doctor wrote:
Out of da blue David Scheidt aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Not incidently, SCO have waived the $100 license application fee, which
means that you can get your own official Ancient UNIX(TM) Source
I think that you no longer have to include Motif with the JDK.
Just let the distribution of Motif come from freebsd.org , i.e.,
a port or a package.
Too much hassle IMO. I'd *much* rather distribute it as part of the
package, and I'm looking into how feasible it would be to distribute
I think that you no longer have to include Motif with the JDK.
Just let the distribution of Motif come from freebsd.org , i.e.,
a port or a package.
Too much hassle IMO. I'd *much* rather distribute it as part of the
package, and I'm looking into how feasible it would be to
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:54:52PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
crypto distribution as long as we have one.
Even so, moving SSH into the bindist would be one less thing that has to
be merged into Internat all the time.
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:08:23 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
Check it out at:
http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with
lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include langinfo.h, which
Which host are you pilling from? I am slurping things out of
^^^
I've seen this post now three times and I still can't remember what word
I wanted to use there. :-) It must be age I guess...
Nick
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 9:35 AM -0600 5/16/00, Nate Williams wrote:
If this Open Motif can be distributed as a port or package for FreeBSD
itself (and it seems to me that it can), then what hassle is that for
JDK on FreeBSD?
It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
requires multiple
If this Open Motif can be distributed as a port or package for FreeBSD
itself (and it seems to me that it can), then what hassle is that for
JDK on FreeBSD?
It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
requires multiple packages to work.
As long as
No, I'm saying that OpenSource Motif *will* be going through lots of
gyrations in the future, and these gyrations may cause instabilities in
the JDK.
But, if the JDK uses the Motif version it was compiled against, it will
work 'consistently.
Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
crypto distribution as long as we have one.
Is it? I thought the RSAref code being pluggable gave it some
protection, or is merely "pluggability" also classified as
On Tue, 16 May 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Bush Doctor wrote:
Out of da blue David Scheidt aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Not incidently, SCO have waived the $100 license application fee, which
means that you
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Nate Williams wrote:
Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect the Motif stuff to change
alot.
I'm unclear on what gyrations you are expecting from a mature API
codified in an IEEE standard. As long as you're using the Motif
standard interface in your code you should have
Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe
we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the
header file wctype.h, etc.
- Donn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect the Motif stuff to change
alot.
I'm unclear on what gyrations you are expecting from a mature API
codified in an IEEE standard. As long as you're using the Motif
standard interface in your code you should have nothing to worry about.
Ahh, but
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and
contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it
all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-)
I'd go along with that. What do the
19 matches
Mail list logo
