Re: Who is maintainer of kerberos/heimdall/sendmail?

2001-04-12 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
tlambert They appear to use SOMAXCONN, incorrectly. Do you specify which files for sendmail(8) use SOMAXCONN ? There is src/contrib/sendmail/libmilter/main.c, but it is NOT a part of sendmail(8) (and never be used in other components installed). In sendmail, the default second argument of

Re: incorrect subclass?

2001-04-12 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Matthew Jacob([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.09 16:42:05 +: FBSD-I-I do not think you should do that. FBSD-W-Do not do that again. FBSD-E-I told you not to do that. FBSD-F-panic, freeing free identifier of known type when you implemted it, remind me to get a stack of blank punhcards to

NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-12 Thread Thomas Quinot
Hi -CURRENT users, I wonder what should happen when a volume is exported through NFS to a netgroup that contains duplicate hosts. At this site, we have a number of netgroups which contain both qualified and unqualified host names, as in MyNetgroup(somehost,-,-) (somehost.dom.ain,-,-) ...

Re: NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-12 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Of course you are right. Netgroup support got in some area broken when I did the IPv6 merge of NetBSD code. It will be fixed soon, sorry ! Another issue with mountd is, that it allows still one set of flags for one mountpoint. This is done per radix entry in the kernel and tied to each

Re: it seems last changes broke sound.

2001-04-12 Thread Peter S. Housel
At Thu, 12 Apr 2001 13:30:07 +0400, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote: Hello, sound in my box had been dead after last sound-drivers commit FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #44: Thu Apr 12 12:57:24 MSD 2001 pcm0: Yamaha DS-1E (YMF744) mem 0xfecf-0xfecf7fff irq 9 at device 9.0 on pci0 ds1: setmap (48a000,

ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, I'd like to try -current on a few machines. Is there a recent snapshot available as an ISO image somewhere? It'd be much faster than cvsup'ing and making world. Which leads to a more generic question: Wouldn't daily ISO snapshots of -stable and -current be nice to have? (On days when the

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Michael Johnson
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:10:55 -0700 Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'd like to try -current on a few machines. Is there a recent snapshot available as an ISO image somewhere? It'd be much faster than cvsup'ing and making world. Which leads to a more generic question: Wouldn't

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Michael Johnson wrote: Theres not a iso for -CURRENT .. It changes too much. Too bad. you can make your own iso though. ports/sysutils/mkisofs Yes, I've done that before for -stable, but it involves a make world :-) Grabbing an ISO from somewhere and quickly doing a CD install to test some

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 12), Michael Johnson said: On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:10:55 -0700 Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to try -current on a few machines. Is there a recent snapshot available as an ISO image somewhere? It'd be much faster than cvsup'ing and making world.

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Michael Johnson
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Apr 12), Michael Johnson said: On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:10:55 -0700 Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to try -current on a few machines. Is there a recent snapshot available as an ISO image somewhere? It'd be much

Re: Who is maintainer of kerberos/heimdall/sendmail?

2001-04-12 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
tlambert Who is the maintainer of this code? I maintain sendmail. tlambert They appear to use SOMAXCONN, incorrectly. tlambert The value of SOMAXCONN is not valis; the valid limit is only tlambert obtainable from sysctl (kern.ipc.somaxconn). We (Sendmail) will look at integrating your fix

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Dan Nelson wrote: There are no ISO images, but there's something even better. Download the boot floppies for your favorite date and do a net install. I didn't know that - perfect, thanks! -- Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Information Sciences Institute

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Robert Drehmel
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lars Eggert wrote: There's probably some good reason why we don't have this; it'd make it a lot easier to test-drive bug-fixes though. You can get binary snapshots via anonymous ftp at current.freebsd.org in /pub/FreeBSD/snapshots ciao, -robert To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: Who is maintainer of kerberos/heimdall/sendmail?

2001-04-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:24:46 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: tlambert The value of SOMAXCONN is not valis; the valid limit is only tlambert obtainable from sysctl (kern.ipc.somaxconn). We (Sendmail) will look at integrating your fix into 8.12 (which will be the first to

Re: NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-12 Thread Martin Blapp
If we manage it, mountd should soon be able to allow different mount flags for each path you export in /etc/exports. I'm sorry. But now after some investigations and talks with Robert Watson it seems to be clear that this is not possible due the way nfs works. It would be easy to fix mountd,

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Lars Eggert
Dan Nelson wrote: There are no ISO images, but there's something even better. Download the boot floppies for your favorite date and do a net install. The 5.0-20010410-CURRENT installer doesn't recognize my "3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL", which in 4.2 is handled by the xl driver. I guess

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Norbert Koch
Lars Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi! The 5.0-20010410-CURRENT installer doesn't recognize my "3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL", which in 4.2 is handled by the xl driver. I guess the netinstall will have to wait... Uh, is there so much difference between 3c905(B|C)-TX? I ask, because

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
larse I'd like to try -current on a few machines. Is there a recent larse snapshot available as an ISO image somewhere? It'd be much larse faster than cvsup'ing and making world. URL:ftp://current.jp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ISO-IMAGES/ It's not the same of current.FreeBSD.org's

Re: NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-12 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010412 10:11] wrote: If we manage it, mountd should soon be able to allow different mount flags for each path you export in /etc/exports. I'm sorry. But now after some investigations and talks with Robert Watson it seems to be clear that this is not

Re: NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-12 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2001-04-12, Alfred Perlstein crivait : m: "Don't call me dude." *thwack* "The point is that if the workstation is untrusted, what's the stop the mallicious hacker from taking a read-only filehandle and swapping the top byte with the byte required for write access?" The kernel could

Re: incorrect subclass?

2001-04-12 Thread Wes Peters
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: Matthew Jacob([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.09 16:42:05 +: FBSD-I-I do not think you should do that. FBSD-W-Do not do that again. FBSD-E-I told you not to do that. FBSD-F-panic, freeing free identifier of known type when you implemted it, remind me to

Re: NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-12 Thread Matt Dillon
:Hi, : :Of course you are right. Netgroup support got in some area broken :when I did the IPv6 merge of NetBSD code. It will be fixed :soon, sorry ! : :Another issue with mountd is, that it allows still one set of flags :for one mountpoint. This is done per radix entry in the kernel and tied :to

Re: NFS export to netgroup with duplicate hosts

2001-04-12 Thread Martin Blapp
The reason is that the file handles passed to nfsd could then be trivially faked to gain rw access on a ro-exported subdirectory. For example, if you export /usr read-only and /usr/local read-write, you can then construct an NFS request using /usr/local's mount point but

Re: SOMAXCONN -- not tunable?

2001-04-12 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Here are patches to make SOMAXCONN tunable from the config files. Right now, it's not possible to override SOMAXCONN. sysctl -w kern.ipc.somxconn=1024 SOMAXCONN is just a compile time default, and yes it is not

Re: ISO image available?

2001-04-12 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
the only difference I know of between the 905b and c is wake on lan. I thought I heard something about a 905c II that had problems with freebsd, but I don't remember much more. - Original Message - From: "Lars Eggert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Norbert Koch" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL

Re: SOMAXCONN -- not tunable?

2001-04-12 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote: In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Here are patches to make SOMAXCONN tunable from the config files. Right now, it's not possible to override SOMAXCONN. sysctl -w kern.ipc.somxconn=1024 SOMAXCONN is just