For now, p_mtx protects p_pgrp in struct proc. This is quite
troublesome for the following reason:
In some cases, we grab a p_pgrp via struct proc in order to, say,
access the session information of the process group. In other cases,
we traverse the members of a process group in order to, say,
Latest CVS (about 30 minutes ago)
In file included from /usr/src/sbin/vinum/v.c:57:
/usr/src/sbin/vinum/vext.h:77: dev/vinum/vinumutil.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/src/sbin/vinum/list.c:59:
/usr/src/sbin/vinum/vext.h:77: dev/vinum/vinumutil.h: No such file or directory
Hey there, I found a great retail site with all kinds of products. Home
decor, office decor, travel, outdoors, kitchen, etc... Take a look around
at http://www.merchandisewholesale.com just click on the images of the
product to enlarge it for a better view.
Sincerely,
John
To
On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote:
For now, p_mtx protects p_pgrp in struct proc. This is quite
troublesome for the following reason:
Err, it doesn't really. It's mostly undecided at this point. Also, have you
looked at the BSD/OS code on builder? They have process groups and sessions
On Tue, 22 May 2001 04:48:38 -0700 (PDT),
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
John On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote:
For now, p_mtx protects p_pgrp in struct proc. This is quite
troublesome for the following reason:
John Err, it doesn't really. It's mostly undecided at this point. Also,
On Tue, 22 May 2001 21:58:10 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
Seigo On Tue, 22 May 2001 04:48:38 -0700 (PDT),
Seigo John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
John On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote:
For now, p_mtx protects p_pgrp in struct proc. This is quite
troublesome for the following
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:13:47PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that -current is very fragile to say at least, but what's
specifically causing it?
Using simple
for ((i=1;i=300;i++)); do sync; done
does the trick, my system spends more than 50% in system,
according to
On 21 May 2001, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian CDs on FreeBSD with linux emulation way better than you can build
say a -STABLE release on a -CURRENT box... )
I just tried a Linux fdisk binary built in 1997 under FreeBSD-current.
It seemed to
On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001 04:48:38 -0700 (PDT),
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
John On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote:
For now, p_mtx protects p_pgrp in struct proc. This is quite
troublesome for the following reason:
John Err, it doesn't really.
Hello Greg and others,
Well I cannot find that file (/usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumutil.h) there, it
is not there in the cvsweb interface either. However, I can confirm that
/usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumhdr.h
contains a reference to it.
So?
--
regards:
Szilveszter ADAM
Szeged University
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 17:22:12 +0200
From: Szilveszter Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well I cannot find that file (/usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumutil.h) there, it
is not there in the cvsweb interface either. However, I can confirm that
/usr/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumhdr.h
contains a reference to it.
Bruce Evans wrote:
On 21 May 2001, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
[snip]
I don't need it myself (I only ran it to see if it supported Linux
extended partitions (it didn't, at least in it's list of known partition
types)). This is for the old Linux fdisk with a dumb terminal interface
which hadn't
In answer to Greg's query What happens if you try building in
sys/modules/vinum?:
dhcp-133[3] pushd sys/modules/vinum/
/usr/src/sys/modules/vinum /usr/src
dhcp-133[4] make
Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/modules/vinum
@ - /usr/src/sys
machine -
Sergey A. Osokin writes:
I have rewritten devstat_compute_statistics().
Please see the attachment.
Add ``break'' in each ``case''.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On 20-May-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I broke swapping with the vm mutex.
Hopefully I should have this fixed up within a couple of days tops.
No, I'm not heading off to Aruba or someplace after this intrusive
change, I am working on it. Your kernel may panic, but I hope you
all keep a
On 22-May-01 John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-May-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I broke swapping with the vm mutex.
Hopefully I should have this fixed up within a couple of days tops.
No, I'm not heading off to Aruba or someplace after this intrusive
change, I am working on it. Your kernel may
On 22-May-01 John Baldwin wrote:
On 20-May-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I broke swapping with the vm mutex.
Hopefully I should have this fixed up within a couple of days tops.
No, I'm not heading off to Aruba or someplace after this intrusive
change, I am working on it. Your kernel may
John Baldwin wrote:
If I have swap (i.e. I've run swapon on a swap partition) the program is kill
ed
by the system fine. If I don't have swap, then both the memkill process adn
the swapper process (proc0) are stuck in the vmwait wait channel used by
VM_WAIT. Any ideas?
This may not be
Just upgraded to latest sources, doesn't look like the swap issue ... was
performing a 'make -j16 buildworld' when it panic'd ...
Fataltrap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
fault virtual address = 0x11
fault code = supervisor write, page not
19 matches
Mail list logo
