Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based
current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs
running on that machine i got an error message like
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: . Unknown symbol __sF
which somehow came from this ancient library
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based
current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs
running on that machine i got an error message like
Peter removed the stdio
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 01:38:12AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based
current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs
running on
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:12:43AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
Can you back out my scheduler changes just to be sure? I can not foresee
any way that they could cause this, but I'd like to be certain. Blocking
on inode usually indicates a vfs deadlock. Can you break into ddb and
type 'show
There are quite a number of these gadgets on eBay right now, they would
probably make a cheap entry-level platform for powerpc work:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2059912083
For the budget-conscious developer, I'd recommend the Apple 'Beige' G3. Not
much more expensive
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-based
current to a -current as of yesterday, for many, many of the programs
running on that machine i got an error message like
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some
date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild
everything though.
This would be OK, if the X11 package came from the FreeBSD source
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some
date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild
everything though.
This would be OK, if the X11 package came
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some
date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild
everything though.
This would be OK,
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:31:52PM -0400, Mike Barcroft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really understand how this is happening. The uses of NSIG are
also conditionalized. If _POSIX_SOURCE is defined, line 46 should not
be visible. What rev is your /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h and
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some
date which I don't know off-hand). It might
I got the same error on my laptop after cvsuping today. Been reluctant
to after all the talk of recompiles and the kde stability problems, but
gave in after trying to install a port and remembering they switched it
back to tgz
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 03:56, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
nm looks like it was just fixed. I'll give it another whirl :)
sorry
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 03:56, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
The situation did not change during the last two months, even with
the latest GCC imports. beast.FreeBSD.org still blows up attempting
to build world and kernel for i386:
: --
: stage 4: building everything..
:
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Poul-Henning et al,
recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without
GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. My -current is from Oct 12 and the kernel
derived from GENERIC, plus/minus devices/options to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jens Schweikhardt writes:
Poul-Henning et al,
recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without
GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. My -current is from Oct 12 and the kernel
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:32:14PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Actually, this should only be required for old
ntfs_unmount has had this bug since v 1.1: there's a ronly variable that
should be used to detect if the mount is read-only and affect the flags
passed to the VOP_CLOSE of the device vnode accordingly. It's never set to
anything other than zero, but the matching VOP_OPEN in ntfs_mount() gets
it
done.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Edwards writes:
ntfs_unmount has had this bug since v 1.1: there's a ronly variable that
should be used to detect if the mount is read-only and affect the flags
passed to the VOP_CLOSE of the device vnode accordingly. It's never set to
anything other
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 01:38:12AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:22:48AM +0200, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
=20
Had a very bad night after upgrading my main machine from a September-b=
ased
current to a -current as of yesterday, for many,
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
# In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jens Schweikhardt writes:
# Poul-Henning et al,
#
# recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
# following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jens Schweikhardt writes:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In file included from /src/current/sys/geom/geom_bsd.c:62:
/src/current/sys/sys/disklabel.h:174: size of array `__assert174' is negative
*** Error code 1
because of the
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
If you can't deal with having to recompile things over the -current
development cycle then don't run it.
Uh, the issue was the upcoming 5.0 release, which will cause these
same
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Terry Lambert wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
If you can't deal with having to recompile things over the -current
development cycle then don't run it.
Uh, the issue was the upcoming 5.0 release,
According to Kris Kennaway:
load: 0.00 cmd: tcsh 8403 [inode] 0.01u 0.00s 0% 1076k
The dreaded inode problem. I've been seeing this from time to time where the
system will be blocked for all I/O on a given disk with all processes waiting
on inode.
Generally updating the system to a more
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 08:48:15PM +1000, Peter Grehan wrote:
There are quite a number of these gadgets on eBay right now, they would
probably make a cheap entry-level platform for powerpc work:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2059912083
For the budget-conscious
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jens Schweikhardt writes:
Poul-Henning et al,
recently I've tried installing NetBSD on a new disk. I'm not sure if the
following is a coincidence (because it never worked before, even without
GEOM) or is due to GEOM issues. My -current is
I was thinking about buying a webcam (Logitech QuickCam) with an USB port.
What kind of usbcams does FreeBSD-Current support?
But there dosn't seem to be any luck for me?
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/160/2002/2/0/7924294/
/John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Peter Wemm wrote:
Add COMPAT4X=true to your make.conf. We added __stdoutp etc to RELENG_4
and included it in the last two releases. -current's COMPAT4X stuff
has the updated libc.so.4 with these symbols.
If you want to run 4.x binaries, you need COMPAT4X=true so that we can
update the
* De: John Angelmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-13 ]
[ Subjecte: Quickcam ]
I was thinking about buying a webcam (Logitech QuickCam) with an USB port.
What kind of usbcams does FreeBSD-Current support?
I was working on porting the Linux driver for this to freebsd's kernel
at one
On 2002-10-11 15:22, Andre Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That looks like the same error message I've been getting going from
4.6 to 4.7. I have one machine that went to through the build fine.
But the machine that I'm working on now dies at the make buildworld
with the same type message.
I
Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Kris Kennaway:
load: 0.00 cmd: tcsh 8403 [inode] 0.01u 0.00s 0% 1076k
The dreaded inode problem. I've been seeing this from time to time where the
system will be blocked for all I/O on a given disk with all processes waiting
on inode.
Generally
On 2002-10-13 13:36, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had upgraded the machine with a snapshot from the Japan snapshot
image server; apparently, no one ever thinks of compressiong ISO's,
so that was at the limit of what I could download. 8-(.
It may be a good idea to put this flag
Where are you finding Beige G3's for $35?? I quick eBay search showed
the price to be more in the $200 - $300 price range.
That's way too expensive. Search for apple beige g3. There's one at
$41 if you can get hold of a keyboard/mouse:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:00:12AM -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
wrote:
Ditto. Same caveats as well.
Actually, the easiest way for you to reproduce it would probably be to
install the security/fuzz port and run it against ex:
fuzz -u nobody ex
It crashes ex pretty easily. I
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-10-13 13:36, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had upgraded the machine with a snapshot from the Japan snapshot
image server; apparently, no one ever thinks of compressiong ISO's,
so that was at the limit of what I could download. 8-(.
It may be
: On 2002-10-13 13:36, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I had upgraded the machine with a snapshot from the Japan snapshot
: image server; apparently, no one ever thinks of compressiong ISO's,
: so that was at the limit of what I could download. 8-(.
:
: It may be a good idea to
On 2002-10-13 14:49, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
That's a commonly asked question, and a very good answer is in the FAQ :P
There are good reasons why the overworked snapshot servers do not
attempt to compress the ISO images, which btw contain mostly .tgz
[IPv6-only address above; strip the obvious for IPv4-only mail]
We never had to ability to do this before. GEOM can probably do it for
you, with something like this patch:
snip
Oops. Now I get the same error with both kinds of partitions:
disklabel: ioctl DIOCGDINFO: Operation not
Hi,
I still get the following panic (2 are attached) under -current
on my notebook when doing a 'portupgrade -R -f kdebase'.
Anyone else sees this?
### crash1 ###
GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:25:00AM +1000, Peter Grehan wrote:
Where are you finding Beige G3's for $35?? I quick eBay search showed
the price to be more in the $200 - $300 price range.
That's way too expensive. Search for apple beige g3. There's one at
$41 if you can get hold of a
BOUWSMA Beery wrote:
...That is, your kernel can mount the NetBSD partitions with their 16
partitions within, even if `disklabel' doesn't work yet...
Heh, I just mounted the NBSD partition using an un-patched FBSD kernel
with GEOM, even though disklabel (recompiled) refuses to list it.
Here's
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:% ls -l
:248643584 Sep 17 00:03 5.0-CURRENT-20020917-JPSNAP.iso
:212988130 Oct 13 10:39 5.0-CURRENT-20020917-JPSNAP.iso.gz
:
:Compression gets rid of about 36MB.
:
:That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time, overall...
:a 14% reduction in size.
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Compression gets rid of about 36MB.
How long did that take to compress though?
2 minutes on a P3-800 with 128M of RAM and one IDE disk. Doesn't matter,
because all it really adds is latency.
What load did the machine that did the compression have? Currently,
Please be realistic and search the just ended acutions to see what the
current market prices are:
Expand your search to 'apple g3 desktop', which will pick up the
beige desktops. Selective quoting here for sure, but bargains are
available to those who go searching. Mabye the price is being
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:42:52AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy???
panic messages:
---
panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: cd36f000
FYI, the above line is the real panic message..the bwrite panic is
secondary and occurs when trying to sync
tlambert2 That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time,
tlambert2 overall... a 14% reduction in size.
The percentage doesn't matter. If ISO image is compressed, user who
downloads the image may de-compress that image to burn (I don't know
any about the burner softwares which support
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
tlambert2 That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time,
tlambert2 overall... a 14% reduction in size.
The percentage doesn't matter. If ISO image is compressed, user who
downloads the image may de-compress that image to burn (I don't know
any about the
The last tentative date for 5.0-RELEASE I have seen is late November,
early December... This does seem odd since I haven't seen a DP2, but...
Quite a few people seem to be having serious problems with XFree86 for 3-4
weeks, everything from sig 6's, the bezier crashes, to strange freezes
that
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:43:20AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
tlambert2 That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time,
tlambert2 overall... a 14% reduction in size.
The percentage doesn't matter. If ISO image is compressed, user who
downloads the image may de-compress that
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:29:32PM -0400, Carl Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:43:20AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
tlambert2 That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time,
tlambert2 overall... a 14% reduction in size.
The percentage doesn't matter. If ISO image
tlambert2 fetch -o - URL | gunzip unzipped_image
You fully forgot that all users use FreeBSD.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
carl 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it
carl is not a one size fits all period of time).
You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at
least, full 1 day or more), and it is not helpful for ordinal users,
not you.
Again, reducing
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because these problems are lost in the
noise, and I
* De: Makoto Matsushita [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-13 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: HEADS UP: Old port recompiles needed (Re: Unknown symbol
__sF) ]
carl 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it
carl is not a one size fits all period of time).
You forget that you
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:40:20PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:29:32PM -0400, Carl Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:43:20AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
tlambert2 That's 3.4 hours saved on a 28.8K modem download time,
tlambert2 overall... a
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:45:41PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
carl 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it
carl is not a one size fits all period of time).
You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at
least, full 1 day or more), and it is
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because
ref3# make
linking kernel.debug
ld: target elf32-i386-freebsd not found
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/REF3.
ref3#
having done a new cvsup and a new config..
UPDATING has nothing relevant that I can see.
julian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
tlambert2 fetch -o - URL | gunzip unzipped_image
You fully forgot that all users use FreeBSD.
I can tell you how to do the same thing in Windows, using helper
applications with Netscape (winzip), if you need it.
The FTP command I gave works on Linux, AIX,
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
carl 3.4 hours is a lot of time on a dial-up connection (granted it
carl is not a one size fits all period of time).
You forget that you still compressed image with about 30 hours (at
least, full 1 day or more), and it is not helpful for ordinal users,
not you.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back because these problems are lost
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 21:14, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:28:51PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
I know there is some work being done on the recent signal changes to fix
some things, but are we sure this is the problem? I would hate to see
release schedules pushed back
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:21:01PM -0700, Alex Varju wrote:
Hi there,
For the last few days, I have been unable to build a bootable kernel. I
have gone back to GENERIC, and it still doesn't work. When I try to boot,
it panics almost immediately.
70 matches
Mail list logo
