Re: building -CURRENT on RELENG_4

2002-10-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:08:31AM +0700, Max Khon wrote: hi, there! cross-building -CURRENT on RELENG_4 is broken in src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: --- cut here --- ... sh /usr/fbsd/HEAD/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/makeman /usr/libexec/lint1 -m lint.7 lint1: illegal option -- m usage: lint1

Re: UPDATING entry needed (Re: Building KDE3)

2002-10-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:34:25PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:28:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: It's already in UPDATING with the rm -rf /usr/include/g++ line in the steps for going from 4 to -current. Oops, I missed this when I looked for it. Thanks.

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:51:43PM -0400, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] As someone else has pointed out, it is executing at a garbage address which is why it panic'd. My guess is that smb_smb_readx() called some function which had a buffer overflow of a variable on the stack

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Kabaev writes: I hope this problem is fixed now. Let me know if I am sadly mistaken about that :) Thanks! It seems to fix it when building groff directly from the src directory (eg, after your kernel change, yesterday's binaries work). I'm building the world now. Drew To

mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-23 Thread Ollivier Robert
Hello, I've recently recompiled mozilla-devel on a 4.7-STABLE system, no problem, all fonts and everything work fine. Trying the same on CURRENT : - the Makefile is broken for CURRENT's sh/make, the attached patch is needed. - on one machine running mozilla gives nothing (ktrace available)

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:59:14AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Alexander Kabaev writes: I hope this problem is fixed now. Let me know if I am sadly mistaken about that :) Thanks! It seems to fix it when building groff directly from the src directory (eg, after your kernel

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ruslan Ermilov writes: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:59:14AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Alexander Kabaev writes: I hope this problem is fixed now. Let me know if I am sadly mistaken about that :) Thanks! It seems to fix it when building groff directly from the

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread John Baldwin
On 23-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: Vallo Kallaste wrote: I don't understand, then. There should be no other way that an ffs_write call can trap to needing an SMBFS page: #22 0xc03902a8 in calltrap () at {standard input}:99 #23 0xc033af01 in ffs_write (ap=0xd66ebbe8) at

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Vitaly Markitantov
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Umm, guys. The code was dereferencing NULL pointers in the mbchain code which was fixed yesterday. Please test it out with the fixed mbchains code. Yes, it not panics now, but again, when i copy to/from smbfs share i get: cp

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-23 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No one has started work on any of the C99 math functions yet. I think with the exception of the math functions we conform to C99. Actually, I hacked up some patches for fpclassify(), is*(), and friends some time ago. But nobody was interested in

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I therefore believe that the 5.0 release represents a perfect opportunity to remove ssh1 fallback from the default distribution of FreeBSD and hope the FreeBSD team will consider this change. Making SSH 2 the default is one thing. Removing SSH 1 as a

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/10/23 18:21), Vitaly Markitantov wrote: Umm, guys. The code was dereferencing NULL pointers in the mbchain code which was fixed yesterday. Please test it out with the fixed mbchains code. Yes, it not panics now, but again, when i copy to/from smbfs share i get: cp

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Steven Ames
Thus spake Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I therefore believe that the 5.0 release represents a perfect opportunity to remove ssh1 fallback from the default distribution of FreeBSD and hope the FreeBSD team will consider this change. Making SSH 2 the default is one thing. Removing SSH 1

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/10/23 18:00), Sheldon Hearn wrote: Confirmed with rev 1.9 of subr_mchain.c. However, I notice that this only happens with files of 8145 bytes size or larger. [server] # for i in `jot 512 7680`; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=$i count=1 done 2/dev/null [client] $ for i

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Steven Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Making SSH 2 the default is one thing. Removing SSH 1 as a fallback altogether is going to break compatibility with other systems like you'd never believe. For example, I regularly need to SSH into Solaris boxen running SSH 1. These machines

CURRENT an XFree

2002-10-23 Thread horen
5.0 built and installed 10/22 runs fine on a Tyan Thunder K7 with 2 Athlons. Exception: Shutdown of the X server, no matter when and how, causes complete black display. The box is remotely reachable. The only way to restore the console display is to reboot. Guess a known issue. It happens

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-23 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:20, Ollivier Robert wrote: Hello, I've recently recompiled mozilla-devel on a 4.7-STABLE system, no problem, all fonts and everything work fine. Trying the same on CURRENT : - the Makefile is broken for CURRENT's sh/make, the attached patch is needed. Yeah,

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-23 Thread Mike Barcroft
David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thus spake Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No one has started work on any of the C99 math functions yet. I think with the exception of the math functions we conform to C99. Actually, I hacked up some patches for fpclassify(), is*(), and friends

Forgotten locale dirs in etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist

2002-10-23 Thread Adrian Penisoara
Hi, Someone (ache it seems) forgot to add the sr_YU.ISO8859-[25] directories in /usr/share/locale to the BSD.usr.dist mtree file. This breaks installworld in -current. Please fix it. Thanks, Ady (@freebsd.ady.ro) | An

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:21:44PM +0300, Vitaly Markitantov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Umm, guys. The code was dereferencing NULL pointers in the mbchain code which was fixed yesterday. Please test it out with the fixed

Re: Forgotten locale dirs in etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist

2002-10-23 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 19:44:33 +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote: Hi, Someone (ache it seems) forgot to add the sr_YU.ISO8859-[25] directories in /usr/share/locale to the BSD.usr.dist mtree file. Please check your BSD.usr.dist is not obsoleted. They are there from v1.266 -- Andrey A.

Re: Forgotten locale dirs in etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist

2002-10-23 Thread Adrian Penisoara
Hi, There is something strange going on here: these directories do appear in etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist, but somehow they haven't been created neither by 'mergemaster -p', nor at the beginning of make installworld. I had to re-run make installworld about three times and make two directiories

Re: Forgotten locale dirs in etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist

2002-10-23 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 19:58:00 +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote: There is something strange going on here: these directories do appear in etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist, but somehow they haven't been created neither by 'mergemaster -p', nor at the beginning of make installworld. I had to re-run

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ruslan, Buildworld completed, and as I installed it, I was reminded of a problem that I *always* have on this machine when I do a make installworld: === lib/libncurses install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libncurses.a /usr/lib install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libncurses_p.a /usr/lib

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ruslan Ermilov writes: Nice. I was going to ask Peter to upgrade beast with this fix, but now that you've already tested it, I'd like to back out the hack in groff/src/roff/groff/Makefile, if there are no objections. OK.. with the new rtld, a shared groff works. Before you backout the

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:35:30PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Ruslan Ermilov writes: Nice. I was going to ask Peter to upgrade beast with this fix, but now that you've already tested it, I'd like to back out the hack in groff/src/roff/groff/Makefile, if there are no objections.

Re: UPDATING entry needed (Re: Building KDE3)

2002-10-23 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:34:25PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: I normally do something like: find /usr/include -ctime +1 -type f -delete To clean out stale includes after a buildworld. Perhaps something like this should be added to the end

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Mishchenko
On Wed 23 Oct, David Schultz wrote: In either case, you break compatibility. Say I wanted to SSH from those Solaris boxen to my home machine, for example. (I don't, but that's not the point.) If my SSH server didn't have the SSH 1 fallback, there's nothing I could do from the command line

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Sheldon Hearn wrote: [client] $ for i in `jot 512 7680`; do cp /smb/urchin/pub/bytes/$i . || break; done cp: ./8145: Bad address If I truss the cp process, I get this: [...] open(/smb/urchin/pub/bytes/8145,0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) open(./8145,0x401,00) = 4 (0x4)

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread John Baldwin
On 23-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: Sheldon Hearn wrote: [client] $ for i in `jot 512 7680`; do cp /smb/urchin/pub/bytes/$i . || break; done cp: ./8145: Bad address If I truss the cp process, I get this: [...] open(/smb/urchin/pub/bytes/8145,0x0,00) = 3 (0x3)

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Steven Ames wrote: Thus spake Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I therefore believe that the 5.0 release represents a perfect opportunity to remove ssh1 fallback from the default distribution of FreeBSD and hope the FreeBSD team will consider this change. Making SSH 2 the default is

install -C not preserving ctimes (was: Re: UPDATING entry needed (Re: Building KDE3))

2002-10-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:21:09AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:34:25PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: I normally do something like: find /usr/include -ctime +1 -type f -delete To clean out stale includes after a

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
John Baldwin wrote: What happens if you: dd if=/smb/urchin/pub/bytes/8145 of=8145 ? I expect that it works, no problem. This localizes the problem to the VOP_GETPAGES that gets hit in the SMBFS case. Umm, terry. Did you even read all of this thread? He did a simple

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Andrew Mishchenko wrote: On Wed 23 Oct, David Schultz wrote: In either case, you break compatibility. Say I wanted to SSH from those Solaris boxen to my home machine, for example. (I don't, but that's not the point.) If my SSH server didn't have the SSH 1 fallback, there's nothing I

RE: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Lucky Green
David wrote: Thus spake Steven Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Making SSH 2 the default is one thing. Removing SSH 1 as a fallback altogether is going to break compatibility with other systems like you'd never believe. For example, I regularly need to SSH into Solaris boxen running

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Steven Ames
- Original Message - From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] So I upgrade, and I can't get back into the box from my SSH1 client machine to reenable SSH1 services on the box. Genius! 8-) 8-). Its somewhat less than genious not to look over any new config files you've installed to make

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:08:58PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Ruslan, Buildworld completed, and as I installed it, I was reminded of a problem that I *always* have on this machine when I do a make installworld: === lib/libncurses install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 libncurses.a

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:16:26PM -0500, Steven Ames wrote: - Original Message - From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] So I upgrade, and I can't get back into the box from my SSH1 client machine to reenable SSH1 services on the box. Genius! 8-) 8-). Its somewhat less than

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Steven Ames wrote: From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] So I upgrade, and I can't get back into the box from my SSH1 client machine to reenable SSH1 services on the box. Genius! 8-) 8-). Its somewhat less than genious not to look over any new config files you've installed to make sure

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: I think it's safe to say that if you do a remote upgrade to 5.0 and miss this change (if it happens), you're probably going to have missed several other more important change. A source upgrade from 4.x to 5.x is definatly not for the faint of heart or the non detail

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Check the mailing list archives around 4.3-RELEASE, when it was discovered that /etc/pam.conf didn't get ssh lines added to it on upgrades, and people were getting locked out of boxes left and right (predates other entries). Changing behaviour on an upgrade, without the user's consent, is

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:56:55PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: I think it's safe to say that if you do a remote upgrade to 5.0 and miss this change (if it happens), you're probably going to have missed several other more important change. A source upgrade from 4.x to

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Mishchenko
On Wed 23 Oct, Terry Lambert wrote: What if the client machine is a SSH1 Solaris (or Windows) box going into a FreeBSD rackmount? It should *at least* be available as a command line option to the daemon; since some boxes *don't have* consoles at all, it would have the same effect of turning

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ruslan Ermilov writes: but since the latter is just a symlink to the former, I have no idea what's going on here. It may be a bug in the kernel. A comedy of errors. Nearly my entire source tree is dated 1934 -- I'd been dual booting with an old linux kernel that scewed up my clock. I

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 23-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: Sheldon Hearn wrote: [client] $ for i in `jot 512 7680`; do cp /smb/urchin/pub/bytes/$i . || break; done cp: ./8145: Bad address If I truss the cp process, I get this: [...]

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-23 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Seigo Tanimura wrote: On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:44:06 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Incidentally, Solaris 7 on sun4u reserves a space of 256MB in the KVM according to Solaris Internals. On i386 (x86), the size is only 4MB. Not sure whether they use

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Andrew Mishchenko wrote: On Wed 23 Oct, Terry Lambert wrote: What if the client machine is a SSH1 Solaris (or Windows) box going into a FreeBSD rackmount? It should *at least* be available as a command line option to the daemon; since some boxes *don't have*

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew Gallatin
+++ UPDATING23 Oct 2002 21:24:44 - @@ -22,6 +22,19 @@ integrity. Re-enabling write caching can substantially improve performance. +20021023: + Alphas with kernels from between 20020902 and 20021022 and/or + rtld (ld-elf.so.1) older than 20021022 may experience

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-23 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote: I do, however, like the page unwiring idea. As long as it's not too expensive. I have been somewhat disappointed that the buffer cache's buffers are hands off for the vm. I'm confused about your approach though. I think that the rewire

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

unable to make release in -CURRENT

2002-10-23 Thread Daniel Rock
Hi, the following error is probably GEOM related. Since a few weeks I am unable to make release anymore. It bails out while trying to prepare the floppies with the following error: disklabel: /dev/md0c: Device not configured The real md devices from devfs have major number 4: # ls -l /dev/md*

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju lian Elischer writes: Bill Jolitz had a plan for 386BSD where all the buffers were nearly always unmapped from KVM. He was going to have a number of slots available for mapping them which would be used in a lifo order This entire area needs to be rethought. And

Re: unable to make release in -CURRENT

2002-10-23 Thread Daniel Rock
Forget my previous post. The change was commited four days ago. I missed them because I thought most work is done in the chroot'd environment, which is up to date due to the immediate checkout. But the devfs mount prepration was done in the normal /usr/src/release directory which I hadn't

Re: ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Mark Murray
=== bin/df cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/tinderbox/ia64/src/bin/df/df.c: In function `prtstat': /home/tinderbox/ia64/src/bin/df/df.c:394: warning: passing arg 1 of `getbsize' from incompatible pointer type /home/tinderbox/ia64/src/bin/df/df.c: In function `update_maxwidths':

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: Changing behaviour on an upgrade, without the user's consent, is a bad thing (note: *consent*, not *knowledge*: it's not up to the user to know about everything some programmer has diddled into non-operability in the two years since FreeBSD 5.x was branched).

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Andrew Mishchenko wrote: On Wed 23 Oct, Terry Lambert wrote: What if the client machine is a SSH1 Solaris (or Windows) box going into a FreeBSD rackmount? It should *at least* be available as a command line option to the daemon; since some boxes *don't have* consoles at all, it would

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 12:56:55PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: I think it's safe to say that if you do a remote upgrade to 5.0 and miss this change (if it happens), you're probably going to have missed several other more important change. A

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback ] [snipped] You're essentially arguing that upgrade should not change anything, but somehow that moving old stuff out of the way should be done? How is it exactly that you propose we

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-23 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback ] [snipped] You're essentially arguing that upgrade should not change anything, but somehow that moving old stuff out of the way should be done? No. I'm

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:29:30PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: A binary upgrade to 5.0 isn't going to be much better. If you just do it, it's going to leave you with most of the problems described in UPDATING. You're still going to have to remember to delete things

mozilla vs linux emulation in -current?

2002-10-23 Thread Peter Wemm
Has anybody else noticed this in -current? Mozilla hangs for a minute or so at regular intervals.. PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 676 peter 40 54492K 39760K connec 1 2:48 0.83% 0.83% mozilla-bin ... Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Then remove the upgrade option off the sysinstall menu, and be done with the issue: Upgrade not supported for 5.0. I think this is a *BRILLIANT* idea. Not supporting upgrade from 4.X to 5.0 will stave off loads of problems that will all be answered

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: mozilla vs linux emulation in -current?

2002-10-23 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: Isn't this a rather strange address to try and connect to? :-] Wasn't somebody tinkering with the sin_len stuff recently? COMPAT_43 used to do evil things, and the linux emulation depended on that. mini did bu tI hit him with a clue stick til he

5.0-20021023-CURRENT available

2002-10-23 Thread John De Boskey
Hi, I have have uploaded a 5.0-20021023-CURRENT snapshot to usw2.freebsd.org available via anonymous ftp: /pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20021023-CURRENT I am currently unable to boot from the kern/mfsroot floppies due to Cannot find /mfsroot. I have not had a chance to try burning

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Request: remove ssh1 fallback

2002-10-23 Thread Steve Ames
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:14:55PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: This still changes a machine that works into a machine that doesn't work. How is that an upgrade? I've no doubt some informed, good intentioned persons said the same thing when telnetd was no longer enabled by default. *shrug*

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-23 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: Bill Jolitz had a plan for 386BSD where all the buffers were nearly always unmapped from KVM. He was going to have a number of slots available for mapping them which would be used in a lifo order The number of slots was going to be somehow tunable

RE: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-23 Thread Lucky Green
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [requesting 5.0 testers] If you don't have the machine-power to run make release yourself, I hope the japanese snapshot server is producing good snapshots, if that fails, I would appreciate if somebody will produce and put up good releases and/or ISO images somewhere. It

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-23 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Seigo Tanimura wrote: Introduction: The I/O buffer of the kernel are currently allocated in buffer_map sized statically upon boot, and never grows. This limits the scale of I/O performance on a host with large physical memory. We used to tune NBUF to cope with that

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:21:09PM -0700, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I'm doing exactly what I describe. Usual boot to multiuser, then kill all of the processes not strictly necessary (seti, fetchmail, sendmail, you-name-it), mount the smb share -ro from NT4 server, cd

Re: Building -CURRENT with 4.5-RELEASE

2002-10-23 Thread Gerhard Haering
* Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-22 16:55 -0700]: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:48:14AM +0200, Gerhard H?ring wrote: * Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-22 15:01 -0700]: Are you running a current kernel at this point? If you aren't it's safe to say it won't work. No,

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Vallo Kallaste wrote: I don't understand, then. There should be no other way that an ffs_write call can trap to needing an SMBFS page: #22 0xc03902a8 in calltrap () at {standard input}:99 #23 0xc033af01 in ffs_write (ap=0xd66ebbe8) at ../../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:810 #24 0xc029b74d in

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Mike Barcroft
Wed Oct 23 09:03:00 GMT 2002 cvs [update aborted]: /home/ncvs/CVSROOT: Interrupted system call To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-23 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:44:06 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: bde I should be the last to defend the current design and implementation of bde the buffer cache, since I think it gets almost everything wrong (the bde implementation is OK, but has vast complications to work around

Re: Linux and FreeBSD compared

2002-10-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/10/23 16:16), Nigel Weeks wrote: I recently heard a comparison between Linux and FreeBSD that I found amusing. Use freebsd-chat next time, please. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1

2002-10-23 Thread Steve Kargl
The code fragment below causes an ICE if k = 1. No ICE occurs if k = 0 or the optimization level is -O0 or -O1. troutmask:kargl[205] gcc -O2 -c c.c c.c: In function `ice': c.c:11: unrecognizable insn: (insn 179 170 188 (set (reg:SI 85) (ashift:SI (reg/v:SI 62) (const_int 1

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Barcroft writes: === lib/libdisk cc1: warnings being treated as errors /tinderbox/sparc64/src/lib/libdisk/disk.c:428: warning: `assignToPartition' defined but not used I'm actively working on this stuff, but will be at customer sites today so if this gets in