Re: [acpi-jp 1926] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Michael Smith
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 11:42 PM, Frode Nordahl wrote: Why do you need an acpid? misc stuff That's not going to get you anywhere. instruct dhclient to get a new lease on resume (maybe free it on sleep), try to configure wlan if no link detected on ethernet etc. This doesn't

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julian Elischer writes : In fact majors and minors, being dynamic, could change from boot to boot. And just to calm down anybody who's getting nervous now, this is not happening quite yet :-) After the next branch of -current, be it before/after 5.0-R or 5.1-R, and

Re: [acpi-jp 1926] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Frode Nordahl
On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 09:59, Michael Smith wrote: I'm sure people have this and other things they want to configure their computer to do on sleep / resume. I'm sure that you think that FreeBSD needs an acpid because Linux has an acpid. No, I think FreeBSD needs an acpid because it has a

Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On 9 Nov 2002, Frode Nordahl wrote: instruct dhclient to get a new lease on resume (maybe free it on sleep), try to configure wlan if no link detected on ethernet etc. We need to import the OMAPI stuff that comes with the DHCP package. dhclient can be controlled just fine to deal with

Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Mark Murray
Said Matthew N. Dodd: On 9 Nov 2002, Frode Nordahl wrote: instruct dhclient to get a new lease on resume (maybe free it on sleep), try to configure wlan if no link detected on ethernet etc. We need to import the OMAPI stuff that comes with the DHCP package. Ooooh! Yes please! dhclient

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-09 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/11/08 18:13), Daniel Eischen wrote: The problem is that you cannot have 4.x packages and 5.x packages co-mingled on the same system. that's what I'm trying to fix. You'd have to rebuild the 4.x packages before they are fixed. I don't think this is a show-stopper. Just

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-09 Thread Doug Rabson
On Friday 08 November 2002 11:13 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways, : so this doesn't affect fresh

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Julian Elischer wrote: Ok here are some thought about devfs 1/ devices are coming and going and becoming more portable 2/ disk partitioning schemes are also multiplying 3/ devices such as usb or bluetooth nets can be configured in arbitray ways 4/ there are more than 256 types of device

Re: Deadlock during buildworld

2002-11-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Jeff Roberson wrote: [ ... patch ... looks right to me, but I wonder if it opens a race window in the vput() blocks case ...either way, it's no worse than the code it replaces... ] I'll look into it some more, but it looks like someone is holding the exec map while they are trying

Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Frode Nordahl wrote: Why do you need an acpid? misc stuff instruct dhclient to get a new lease on resume (maybe free it on sleep), try to configure wlan if no link detected on ethernet etc. I put my computer to sleep instead of turning it of most of the time, and having to run killall

getting rid of mknod? (was Re: getting rid of devfs...)

2002-11-09 Thread Andrew Lankford
You can still make device nodes so that the disk can be exported, but as, in -current the major and minor number will not exist ...Or use softlinks, perhaps? I can't seem to read mknod(8) disk device nodes anymore in -current. Andrew Lankford To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Value 0xd0d0d0d0 ?

2002-11-09 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I would like to know where/when the value 0xd0d0d0d0 is assigned to a pointer ? Sometimes I have some pointers which have a correct value before and suddenly they got this odd 0xd0d0d0d0 value :/ -- Aurélien msg46431/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-09 Thread Sid Carter
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:05:32 -0800 (PST), Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Nate Try disabling acpi: Nate echo hint.acpi.0.disable=1 /boot/device.hints Nate My IBM laptop does not work with ACPI yet. Hi, I don't think acpi has got anything to do with his. I still had this

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-09 Thread Sid Carter
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:14:06 -0800, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Terry Or look in the -current archives; Mitsuru IWASAKI posted a patch Terry yesterday at 11:29 PM. Terry http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1206362+0+current/freebsd-current Hi, I have applied

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-09 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Doug Rabson wrote: On Friday 08 November 2002 11:13 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: This is not a fly in the pointment, but rather a major incompatibility that makes it impossible to have a reasonable mix. If it's really a

Re: Value 0xd0d0d0d0 ?

2002-11-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Aurelien Nephtali writes: --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I would like to know where/when the value 0xd0d0d0d0 is assigned to a point= er ? Sometimes I have

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-09 Thread Doug Rabson
On Saturday 09 November 2002 4:28 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Doug Rabson wrote: On Friday 08 November 2002 11:13 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: This is not a fly in the pointment, but rather a major incompatibility that makes it

Re: [acpi-jp 1925] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Takanori Watanabe
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Terry Lambert wrote: Hiten Pandya wrote: I have been searching mailing lists and my friend Google for information about a acpid (like apmd) implementation for FreeBSD, but I have found nothing. Does one exist anywhere, or has anyone started out on something

Hifn Panic on Soekris net4501

2002-11-09 Thread Stephan Holtwisch
Hi, attached the kernel panic, without the hifn driver the kernel boots without problems. Its somewhat difficult to debug though, since this system resides on Sandisk without anything than a kernel yet. Stephan FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Sat Nov 9 20:47:41 CET 20021 A0004000 09

Re: Deadlock during buildworld

2002-11-09 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Jeff Roberson wrote: [ ... patch ... looks right to me, but I wonder if it opens a race window in the vput() blocks case ...either way, it's no worse than the code it replaces... ] I'll look into it some more, but it looks like someone

Re: [acpi-jp 1925] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Ian Dowse
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takanori Watanabe writes: It is obious there will be good if we have a way to catch power event from userland. I have some ideas to implement it. One way is implement with kqueue(2) and /dev/acpi to get power events. This way does not require daemons to wait the

Re: [acpi-jp 1933] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Takanori Watanabe
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian Dowse wrote: I've been using the following far-from-ideal patch for a while now - it just supplies binary integers to /dev/acpi whenever the sleep state changes. The choice of encoding of data is stupid, and the acpiread() doesn't do blocking - I just use it in a

Re: [acpi-jp 1933] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Ian Dowse
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takanori Watanabe writes: == Next way is that make /dev/acpictl node that can open exclusively and catch the power event by it, like apmd. == This way requires that the event reading proceess should be only one, so we need another device node to read event. Yes,

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-09 Thread Takanori Watanabe
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: DEVFS: 3. major/minors will be dynamically assigned. So we will need file to list node id list in printf(9) format, instead of /sys/conf/majors. And more better if we generate device name #define or array of string from the file.

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takanori Watanabe writes: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: DEVFS: 3. major/minors will be dynamically assigned. So we will need file to list node id list in printf(9) format, instead of /sys/conf/majors. I am not sure about this... [1]

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-09 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hmmm, I didn't notice that there is a BIOS which requires memory area below 640K even when calling INT 15H/E820. We cannot trust that today's BOISes have INT 12H, so it's difficult to determine base memory size w/o INT 15H/E820. You keep saying

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Doug Rabson wrote: The kernel ABI is hopeless. It changes almost daily :-(. At one time, I thought I could change this but these days, I don't think anyone except me cares about having a stable ABI in the kernel. I care. It's almost the most important thing to be able to build anything of

firewire disk dowsn't work

2002-11-09 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, attached is the /var/log/messages excerpt after booting with a 120G Maxtor disk in a IceCube USB 2.0/Firewire Combo case. The messages at the end are from an attempt to fdisk da0. Booting with a USB cable works (as USB 1.0). Firewire doesn't. Any clues? Thanks in advance! ... Nov 9 22:03:10

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Takanori Watanabe wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: DEVFS: 3. major/minors will be dynamically assigned. So we will need file to list node id list in printf(9) format, instead of /sys/conf/majors. No. The wired relationship must go away, per the

Panics instead of Hard Locks

2002-11-09 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
Since going from a SMP to nonSMP kernel the Hard Locks don't seem to be happening. However I'm getting panics. I've gotten 4 'sleeping thread owns a mutex' panics and one each of 'Assertion i != 0 failed at ../../../kern/subr_witness.c:669' and 'Duplicate free of item 0xc3895cc0 from zone

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: [acpi-jp 1931] Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-09 Thread Michael Smith
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: Repeat: #1 is power profiles I don't see why this requires an 'acpid'. You want a control tool, sure, but power policy is not something that needs a daemon. o replacing devices in a multipurpose bay, which may take one of a

Make world as benchmark?

2002-11-09 Thread walt
I have two identical installations of -CURRENT on one machine. The only difference is that one is on a UDMA100 disk and the other is on a UDMA66 disk. Both have softupdates enabled. The total times for a make world make kernel: UDMA100: 88 minutes UDMA66 : 95 minutes Does this seem an

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : If you can't agree on a coordinate system (OLDCARD? NEWCARD? : REDCARD? BLUECARD?), then at least agree to get rid of data : interfaces; Ironically, NEWCARD and OLDCARD are driver compatible because it doesn't

Anyone seeing snp(4) problems?

2002-11-09 Thread Juli Mallett
I just tried to sudo watch ttyv1 and ran into the following: % Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode % fault virtual address = 0x60 % fault code= supervisor read, page not present % instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc1d7f4b8 % stack pointer = 0x10:0xca649b18 % frame