Re: Wrong date for DEVFS entries

2003-02-08 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrey A. Chernov writes: On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 00:16:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we stop considering workarounds, and instead work on solving the problem please ? I see no solving way until kernel will understand fully and can handle timezone

Eduactional Time15715

2003-02-08 Thread Samantha
This message is an advertisement. We will continue to bring you valuable permission based messages on the products and services that interest you most unless you wish to decline. We process all requests immediately. Copyright 2000, 2001, 2002 all rights

Panic in fork()

2003-02-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100 fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01a1e2d stack pointer = 0x10:0xe4146c74 frame pointer = 0x10:0xe4146cbc code

Re: Preferred Gigabit interfaces for -CURRENT

2003-02-08 Thread Adam Maas
Likely part of the performance issue was due to the Chipset of the motherboard. Your typical 32bit 33MHz PCI bus is going to be marginal for routing GigE traffic, just due to bus bandwidth limitations, but it'll handle multiple 100BaseTX cards just fine. While a higher-end setup like a Serverworks

Re: Panic in fork()

2003-02-08 Thread Morten Rodal
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:24:06AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100 fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01a1e2d stack pointer

Re: Panic in fork()

2003-02-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:24:06AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 0100 fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01a1e2d stack pointer

Dumping broken?

2003-02-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
I'm having lots of problems with crashdumps under 5.0. Most of the time trying to force a dump via 'call doadump' returns an error about 'Context switches not permitted in the debugger'. Calling it again causes the system to hang. Is anyone else seeing this? Kris msg51987/pgp0.pgp

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-02-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: GEOM and Extended Slices

2003-02-08 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of: Hiten Pandya wrote: Hi gang. Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel... I've been using extended slices on both

Re: Dumping broken?

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Sat, 2003/02/08 at 03:18:54 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm having lots of problems with crashdumps under 5.0. Most of the time trying to force a dump via 'call doadump' returns an error about 'Context switches not permitted in the debugger'. Calling it again causes the system to hang.

Re: Dumping broken?

2003-02-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm having lots of problems with crashdumps under 5.0. Most of the time trying to force a dump via 'call doadump' returns an error about 'Context switches not permitted in the debugger'. Calling it again causes the system to hang. Is anyone else

Re: GEOM and Extended Slices

2003-02-08 Thread walt
Hiten Pandya wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of: Hiten Pandya wrote: Hi gang. Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel... I've been using extended

Re: GEOM and Extended Slices

2003-02-08 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:03:53AM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of: Hiten Pandya wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of: Hiten Pandya wrote: Hi gang. Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my dos

Re: Panic in fork()

2003-02-08 Thread Morten Rodal
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:05:12AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: bento# addr2line -e kernel.debug 0xc01a1e2d ../../../kern/kern_fork.c:388 for (; p2 != NULL; p2 = LIST_NEXT(p2, p_list)) { PROC_LOCK(p2); 388 -- while (p2-p_pid == trypid

Re: Wrong date for DEVFS entries

2003-02-08 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:01:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see no solving way until kernel will understand fully and can handle timezone database format. It means timezone code should be integrated into kernel. And for which reason? Only to heal DEVFS timestamps? Mount workaround

Re: Wrong date for DEVFS entries

2003-02-08 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 16:52:28 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: Obvious workaround: could DEVFS be mounted read-only initially and then re-mounted as read-write after adjkerntz started, in the same manner as / remounted read-write, i.e. with mount -u ? No. devfs silently ignores MNT_RDONLY

Re: 5.0 cron problem

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-02-08, CHOI Junho écrivait : Oh sorry... I didn't restart cron :P. It works well. 'cron -x pars' says that whitespaces is correctly parsed. OK, that's reassuring! Ollivier can you review the posted patch please? Thanks, Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: Preferred Gigabit interfaces for -CURRENT

2003-02-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Wes Peters wrote: On Friday 07 February 2003 01:25, David Gilbert wrote: I believe that someone here recomended Tigon III based cards ... but I was recently looking through 5.0-RELEASE's hardware notes and couldn't find any mention of Tigon III. The follow-on to the Tigon II is the

Re: vinum start -current doesn't work as expected

2003-02-08 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Michael Reifenberger wrote: ... As a workaround, you can try setting vinum_load=YES vinum.autostart=YES in your /boot/loader.conf, /and/ remove the start_vinum line from rc.conf. Please tell me whether this gives different results. Bad things happen when doing

Corrupted crashdump?

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Quinot
On a Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop, with ACPI disabled, 5.0-REL rebooted while the system was quiescent. gdb appears to be unable to make sense of the produced crash dump: # gdb -k /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MALEVIL/kernel.debug vmcore.1 GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD) [...] This GDB was configured as

Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Ray Kohler
Has anyone tried building world/kernel with high optimizations (-O2, -O3) recently? What breaks? (Booby prize to whoever says common sense ;) I last tried it quite a few months ago and the resolver died on me, don't know what else. I'm not really thinking of running like that, but I am curious

Re: Corrupted crashdump?

2003-02-08 Thread Aurelien Nephtali
Hi, I've got the same problem after a panic, the produced core dump was invalid. I'm on -CURRENT and I think the reason of the core production isn't the same as you, but the core dump problem is the same, I'm sure of it. I'm also on a laptop (Compaq Presarion) but ACPI is enabled. I have removed

gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers

2003-02-08 Thread Brent Verner
In trying to compile the most recent native jdk-1.4.1, I noticed that compiling with the iostream.h header didn't work. // ** won't link ** #include iostream.h // ** works ** // #include backward/iostream.h // ** works ** // #include iostream // using namespace std; int main(){ return 1; }

Re: New technologies in FreeBSD 5.x vs. 4.x

2003-02-08 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:23:58PM +0100, taxman wrote: Very detailed information for every commit can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ Adrian, For your FreeBSD news article, if you want to get in contact with developers who have added new things to FreeBSD, I recommend you

Re: Preferred Gigabit interfaces for -CURRENT

2003-02-08 Thread Wes Peters
On Saturday 08 February 2003 17:22, Terry Lambert wrote: Wes Peters wrote: On Friday 07 February 2003 01:25, David Gilbert wrote: I believe that someone here recomended Tigon III based cards ... but I was recently looking through 5.0-RELEASE's hardware notes and couldn't find any

Re: vinum start -current doesn't work as expected

2003-02-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I guess it's time to dump the old vinum start code from vinum(8) completely, and use the in-kernel scan now. This sounds like a good idea. Not after looking a bit closer. ;-) The only difference ist that the userland vinum start uses devstat, while the

Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers

2003-02-08 Thread Matthew Emmerton
Your working example below compiles without error using gcc 2.95.x (FreeBSD 4.x) and gcc 3.2.x (FreeBSD 5.x), which is expected since it's compliant C++. (See Stroustrup's The C++ Programming Language, section 9.2.2, which indicates that the proper way to include C++ standard library headers such

syslog bug

2003-02-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
syslog(3) botches things if you pass it a string that has %%m in it. this should fix it, any comments? Index: syslog.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/syslog.c,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -r1.28 syslog.c --- syslog.c

Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers

2003-02-08 Thread Brent Verner
[2003-02-08 15:56] Matthew Emmerton said: | Your working example below compiles without error using gcc 2.95.x (FreeBSD | 4.x) and gcc 3.2.x (FreeBSD 5.x), which is expected since it's compliant | C++. (See Stroustrup's The C++ Programming Language, section 9.2.2, which | indicates that the

Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers

2003-02-08 Thread Matthew Emmerton
It compiled on -CURRENT and -STABLE using this: #include iostream You've got #include iostream.h in your example below. Matt - Original Message - From: Brent Verner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:15 PM

Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers

2003-02-08 Thread Matthew Emmerton
Specifically, this is the exact code that compiles error/warning free on gcc 2.95.4 (4-STABLE) and gcc 3.2.1 (5.0-REL) // begin code #include iostream using namespace std; void xxx (ostream os); int main(void) { xxx(cout); } void xxx (ostream os) { os ''; os out\n; } // end code -

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

2003-02-08 Thread phk
I have played with the statistics collection in GEOM a bit, and need more feedback, but first: try to play with it a bit. Assuming you're running -current as of today, otherwise install include files and libgeom by hand first. Apply this patch in src/sys/geom and make a new kernel.

Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers

2003-02-08 Thread Brent Verner
[2003-02-08 16:19] Matthew Emmerton said: | It compiled on -CURRENT and -STABLE using this: | | #include iostream | | You've got #include iostream.h in your example below. Deleting /usr/include/g++ and making installworld, fixes my problem. The compiler now gives the expected behavior; it

Re: Panic in fork()

2003-02-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 04:12:26PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: addr2line will usually point to the first line of a statement if it spans multiple lines; in this case, the full guard is: while (p2-p_pid == trypid || p2-p_pgrp-pg_id == trypid ||

printf....!

2003-02-08 Thread Auge Mike
Hi all, I was trying to know how printf works in FreeBSD... I hvae reached to this point : #define _write(fd, s, n) \ __syscall(SYS_write, (int)(fd), (const void *)(s), (size_t)(n)) I'am not really familiar with the way FreeBSD handle interrupts. I like from any one of you to tell me what

Re: printf....!

2003-02-08 Thread David Leimbach
Isn't it ultimately interrupt 08 on the PC with an index in the EAX register for the write subroutine? I am pretty sure that's correct. I might have the interrupt value wrong though. Dave On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 04:12 PM, Auge Mike wrote: Hi all, I was trying to know how

Re: printf....!

2003-02-08 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:23:21 -0600 David Leimbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy. Isn't it ultimately interrupt 08 on the PC with an index in the EAX register for the write subroutine? I am pretty sure that's correct. I might have the interrupt value wrong though. s/08/0x80/ :-)

Re: gcc-3.2.1 and c++ headers

2003-02-08 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 04:55:07PM -0500, Brent Verner wrote: [2003-02-08 16:19] Matthew Emmerton said: | It compiled on -CURRENT and -STABLE using this: | | #include iostream | | You've got #include iostream.h in your example below. Deleting /usr/include/g++ and making installworld,

Re: printf....!

2003-02-08 Thread Craig Rodrigues
I was trying to know how printf works in FreeBSD... I hvae reached to this point : #define _write(fd, s, n) \ __syscall(SYS_write, (int)(fd), (const void *)(s), (size_t)(n)) I'am not really familiar with the way FreeBSD handle interrupts. I like from any one of you to tell me what

__semctl() prototype

2003-02-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped? Kris msg52022/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

_fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes

2003-02-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped? Also _fpathconf() in lib/libc/gen/statvfs.c Kris msg52023/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Question regarding LOR in vfs_mount.c

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Kostouros
Hi The LOR detected in /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c (process lock on line 1144, and filedesc structure on line 1151) has been previously reported: I have noticed it upon shutdown. An LOR fix was presented recently for a similar LOR arising in kern_descrip.c , see

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone tried building world/kernel with high optimizations (-O2, -O3) recently? What breaks? (Booby prize to whoever says common sense ;) I last tried it quite a few months ago and the resolver died on me, don't know what else. I'm not really

Re: _fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes

2003-02-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:06:27PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped? Also _fpathconf() in lib/libc/gen/statvfs.c

Re: vinum start -current doesn't work as expected

2003-02-08 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 8 February 2003 at 21:42:27 +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: As Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I guess it's time to dump the old vinum start code from vinum(8) completely, and use the in-kernel scan now. This sounds like a good idea. Not after looking a bit closer. ;-) The only

Re: vinum start -current doesn't work as expected

2003-02-08 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 8 February 2003 at 18:34:04 +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Michael Reifenberger wrote: ... As a workaround, you can try setting vinum_load=YES vinum.autostart=YES in your /boot/loader.conf, /and/ remove the start_vinum line from rc.conf. Please tell

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Terry Lambert
David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone tried building world/kernel with high optimizations (-O2, -O3) recently? What breaks? (Booby prize to whoever says common sense ;) I last tried it quite a few months ago and the resolver died on me, don't know what

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone tried building world/kernel with high optimizations (-O2, -O3) recently? What breaks? (Booby prize to whoever says common sense ;) I last tried it quite a few months ago

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-02-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Any chance of getting these OpenSSL warnings quieted?

2003-02-08 Thread David O'Brien
cc -pipe -O -march=athlon -D_IEEE_LIBM -D_ARCH_INDIRECT=i387_ -c /FBSD/src/lib/msun/src/e_gammaf_r.c -o e_gammaf_r.o In file included from /FBSD/obj/FBSD/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/openssl/e_os2.h:56, from /FBSD/obj/FBSD/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/openssl/symhacks.h:58,

Re: Any chance of getting these OpenSSL warnings quieted?

2003-02-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 4:39 PM -0800 2/8/03, David O'Brien wrote: cc -pipe -O -march=athlon -D_IEEE_LIBM -D_ARCH_INDIRECT=i387_ -c /FBSD/src/lib/msun/src/e_gammaf_r.c -o e_gammaf_r.o In file included from /FBSD/obj/FBSD/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/openssl/e_os2.h:56, from

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Terry Lambert
David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually, failure to use optimization suppresses some compilation warnings, particularly those which normally print from using some variables without initializing them. I think you're thinking of dataflow analysis, which I

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Actually, failure to use optimization suppresses some compilation warnings, particularly those which normally print from using some variables without initializing them. I

Re: Panic in fork()

2003-02-08 Thread Tim Robbins
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:04:56PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 04:12:26PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: addr2line will usually point to the first line of a statement if it spans multiple lines; in this case, the full guard is: while (p2-p_pid

Re: Any chance of getting these OpenSSL warnings quieted?

2003-02-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 8:15 PM -0500 2/8/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: I'm also getting a number of syslog'ed error messages about sshd[14235]: in _openpam_check_error_code(): pam_sm_setcred(): unexpected return value 24 with the system I built on Feb 3rd. However, I do notice there have been

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 08-Feb-2003 Ray Kohler wrote: Has anyone tried building world/kernel with high optimizations (-O2, -O3) recently? What breaks? (Booby prize to whoever says common sense ;) I last tried it quite a few months ago and the resolver died on me, don't know what else. I'm not really thinking of

CepNews Þubat 2003

2003-02-08 Thread CepNews
Title: CepNews

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 09-Feb-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Feb 08), Conrad Sabatier said: Call me a fool, but I've been using this for quite some time now, in both -stable (well, with slight modifications) and -current: CPUTYPE?=k7 CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -mmmx -m3dnow -fforce-mem -fforce-addr

Re: Compiling with high optimization?

2003-02-08 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 08), Conrad Sabatier said: Call me a fool, but I've been using this for quite some time now, in both -stable (well, with slight modifications) and -current: CPUTYPE?=k7 CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -mmmx -m3dnow -fforce-mem -fforce-addr -fstrength-reduce \ -fthread-jumps