'su' error after cvsup to current 5.1

2003-07-31 Thread DvG
Hi all ! I am having a strange problem after cvsup to current from stable (make world/install world) with 'su' with all accounts in wheel group except root, more exactly to say : 8:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$su Password: pam_unix: pam_sm_authenticate: UNIX authentication refused Sorry i tried to

Re: 'su' error after cvsup to current 5.1

2003-07-31 Thread Sebastian Yepes [ESN]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:11:34AM +0300, DvG wrote: Hi all ! I am having a strange problem after cvsup to current from stable (make world/install world) with 'su' with all accounts in wheel group except root, more exactly to say : 8:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$su Password: pam_unix:

Re: Lucent IBSS mode doesn't work in -CURRENT?

2003-07-31 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Hey, I have a few Orinoco cards, and they 'work' in both ad-hoc and infrastructure mode. However with dhclient it gets tricky, because it will only work the first time dhclient assigns an address to the card. Whenever it tries to refresh it or whatever, I start getting those timeout and busy bit

Re: strange umass/scsi behaviour

2003-07-31 Thread Terry Lambert
John Hay wrote: Does anyone have an idea why the umass/scsi code behave differently between if you boot with a device already plugged in as opposed to plugging it in later? In my case it is a Sandisk Cruiser. If I plug it in before booting, it works just great, but if I plug it in later, it

Re:'su' error after cvsup to current 5.1

2003-07-31 Thread DvG
but the /usr/src/UPDATING says: There's a bug in the world build process. The cross-tools are build with the NEW headers, but the OLD libc.a. This leads to all kinds of problems with the new libc. A temporary workaround is to add CFLAGS=-O -pipe

Re: 4.8-Current Depreciated files

2003-07-31 Thread Terry Lambert
John Birrell wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:44:54PM +0930, Benjamin Close wrote: I'm about to upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to Current (following the instructions in UPDATING) and was just wondering if mergemaster removes depreciated files between the two versions. Ie: /etc/rc.sendmail

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-31 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-31 06:32:19 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-07-31 06:32:19 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-31 06:34:17 - building world TB --- cd

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-31 Thread Terry Lambert
Tony Finch wrote: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't wait for IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration plus SLPv2 so we can get rid of all this DHCP crap once and for all. 8-(. SLPv2 is used to find the gateway and DNS server, and after that, everything magically works. I thought that

panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fffffe0007e8e000

2003-07-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
I upgraded the alpha package machines tonight, and one of them fell over shortly after taking load, with the following: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fe0007e8e000 Stack backtrace: db_print_backtrace() at db_print_backtrace+0x18 backtrace() at backtrace+0x2c panic() at

[Bug c++/11735] [3.3 Regression] internal compiler error:Segmentation fault

2003-07-31 Thread Kai Mosebach
Here about the latest bug, i was telling about ... Regards Kai -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 01:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [Bug c++/11735] [3.3 Regression] internal compiler error:

Re: gcc segfault on -CURRENT (cvs yesterday)

2003-07-31 Thread Terry Lambert
Kai Mosebach wrote: Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday. On a system from 22.July it compiled fine. Any ideas ? This is pretty ugly, but put a space before the ::'s on that line. -- Terry ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

world broken with a gcc 3.2 world?

2003-07-31 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, with a Jul 10 world, a clean /usr/obj and the sources as of yesterday I get ---snip--- /big/usr/src/contrib/gcc/dwarf2out.c:11739:75: missing terminating ' character /big/usr/src/contrib/gcc/dwarf2out.c:11741:71: warning: multi-line string litera ls are deprecated

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-07-31 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-31 08:05:33 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-07-31 08:05:33 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-31 08:08:13 - building world TB --- cd

vinum on md disks

2003-07-31 Thread Rus Foster
Hi All, I'm just trying to learn vinum so am trying to create a stripe out of 2 MD disk disks. I've create two md deivce //dev/md[01] then fieldpoint# bsdlabel -w /dev/md0 fieldpoint# bsdlabel -w /dev/md1 fieldpoint# vinum vinum - stripe /dev/md0h /dev/md1h Can't create drive vinumdrive5, device

5.1 on an A31p

2003-07-31 Thread Ben Laurie
So, after a long pause, I'm trying to get 5.x working on my IBM A31p. I've made a boot CD from the 5.1 ISO images, vintage a week or so ago. When I boot (in any mode, ACPI on or off, or Safe), it dies immediately after discovering firewire: firewire0: IEEE1394(FireWire) bus on fwohci0 Fatal

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
Wilko Bulte writes: Sounds like an SRM problem or EISA configuration problem. Normaly the bus and then system board should be probed at this point. We never used EISA on alpha before - EISA bridge support was only conditionalisized on pci. Which triggers me: did you run the ECU? A

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: Wilko Bulte writes: Sounds like an SRM problem or EISA configuration problem. Normaly the bus and then system board should be probed at this point. We never used EISA on alpha before - EISA bridge support was only

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
Wilko Bulte writes: On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: Wilko Bulte writes: Sounds like an SRM problem or EISA configuration problem. Normaly the bus and then system board should be probed at this point. We never used EISA on alpha before - EISA bridge

make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Bruce Cran
There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but 'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os build, the build failed in /usr/src/contrib/telnet/telnetd/authenc.c and ext.h. I have since verified that the 'release' succeeds when the

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:03:12PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: Wilko Bulte writes: On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:40:28PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: Wilko Bulte writes: Sounds like an SRM problem or EISA configuration problem. Normaly the bus and then system board should be probed at this

Re: make -U

2003-07-31 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why go thru those contortions? I sometimes use make FOO= to define things. -U obviously has a place, if it not existing means I have to have all these contortions to do a fairly obvious thing, yeah? What are the exact semantics of -U supposed to be? --

Re: make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Scott Long
Bruce Cran wrote: There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but 'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os build, the build failed in /usr/src/contrib/telnet/telnetd/authenc.c and ext.h. I have since verified that the 'release'

Re: make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
Scott Long writes: Bruce Cran wrote: There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but 'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os build, the build failed in /usr/src/contrib/telnet/telnetd/authenc.c and ext.h. I have since

Re: make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Tim Kientzle
Mark Murray wrote: Scott Long writes: Bruce Cran wrote: There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but 'rerelease' fails in telnetd. I saw this too, but couldn't verify that it wasn't due to other problems that I was experiencing. Mark, can you take a glance at

panic: spin lock sched lock held

2003-07-31 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, got this panic overnight. Machine was wedged solid and didn't enter ddb after the panic. I'll recompile with verbose diagnostics and see if it happens again. In the meantime, maybe the message will give someone a clue: panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0xca462390 for 5 seconds cpuid =

Re: make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: Scott Long writes: Bruce Cran wrote: There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but 'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os build, the build failed in

Re: Alpha/EISA broken?

2003-07-31 Thread Mark Murray
Wilko Bulte writes: And then do what with? Boot off it? run it from the bios? runecu from SRM. Better have a VGA card installed. Serial console is possible to but is a bit (hum..) of a challenge. I'm in big trouble. I have no VGA, it hangs off EISA, and I need to turn it on. I can

make buildworld: Signal 11; Illegal instruction

2003-07-31 Thread Chris Shenton
I'm trying to do a make buildworld on my system: FreeBSD PECTOPAH.shenton.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #2: Tue Jul 1 19:48:37 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PECTOPAH i386 And it keeps dying at various points early in the build. It's a different location each time, some

Re: Lucent IBSS mode doesn't work in -CURRENT?

2003-07-31 Thread Sam Leffler
I have a few Orinoco cards, and they 'work' in both ad-hoc and infrastructure mode. However with dhclient it gets tricky, because it will only work the first time dhclient assigns an address to the card. Whenever it tries to refresh it or whatever, I start getting those timeout and busy bit

Re: make buildworld: Signal 11; Illegal instruction

2003-07-31 Thread Chris Shenton
Chris Shenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *** Signal 11 ... Illegal instruction (core dumped) *** Error code 132 Also seeing *** Signal 4 if it matters. This sounds way too flakey to be SW. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [Fwd: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sys_pipe.c]

2003-07-31 Thread Alan L. Cox
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:15:09PM -0500, Alan L. Cox wrote: I believe that the attached commit addresses the panic: sleeping thread owns a mutex problem reported by Kris and another related problem reported a few days earlier. The earlier problem report included the

Re: usb dma patch

2003-07-31 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Bernd Walter wrote this message on Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:28 +0200: On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:45:24PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: ohci code doesn't support isochronous so far. There is a patch to add this kern/52589. Ok, this code has been integrated and the url below has been updated.

SV: Does bimap (ipnat) work to anyone ?

2003-07-31 Thread Matt Douhan
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Fran: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does ``bimap'' work to anyone ? I'm using IP Filter: v3.4.31 (336) and I can't make it work for me: Does not work for me on CURRENT, but it works fine on STABLE Matt ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: panic: spin lock sched lock held

2003-07-31 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Lars Eggert wrote: got this panic overnight. Machine was wedged solid and didn't enter ddb after the panic. I'll recompile with verbose diagnostics and see if it happens again. In the meantime, maybe the message will give someone a clue: panic: spin lock sched lock

Re: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fffffe0007e8e000

2003-07-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:48:59AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: I upgraded the alpha package machines tonight, and one of them fell over shortly after taking load, with the following: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fe0007e8e000 Stack backtrace: db_print_backtrace() at

Re: make buildworld: Signal 11; Illegal instruction

2003-07-31 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:03:01PM -0400, Chris Shenton wrote: Chris Shenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *** Signal 11 ... Illegal instruction (core dumped) *** Error code 132 Also seeing *** Signal 4 if it matters. This sounds way too flakey to be SW. I'm seeing the same

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-07-31 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-31 20:19:00 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-07-31 20:19:00 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-31 20:21:08 - building world TB --- cd

Re: make -U

2003-07-31 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 1:39 PM + 7/31/03, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why go thru those contortions? I sometimes use make FOO= to define things. -U obviously has a place, if it not existing means I have to have all these contortions to do a fairly obvious thing,

Re: 5.1 on an A31p

2003-07-31 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Ben Laurie wrote: So, after a long pause, I'm trying to get 5.x working on my IBM A31p. I've made a boot CD from the 5.1 ISO images, vintage a week or so ago. When I boot (in any mode, ACPI on or off, or Safe), it dies immediately after discovering firewire: firewire0: IEEE1394(FireWire)

LOR during boot

2003-07-31 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, I'm getting the following LOR on each boot, system works fine nevertheless: ... Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging disabled DUMMYNET initialized (011031) IPv6 packet filtering initialized, logging

CVSUP problems

2003-07-31 Thread Rus Foster
Hi all I'm trying to pull the 5.1 source with the following cvsup file *default host=cvsup8.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5 *default compress src-all Doing cvsup it just hangs...doesn't seem to be writing... Have I done something stupid?

Re: CVSUP problems

2003-07-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:57:45 -0700 (PDT), Rus Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I'm trying to pull the 5.1 source with the following cvsup file *default host=cvsup8.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5 *default compress src-all Doing cvsup it

Re: CVSUP problems

2003-07-31 Thread Rus Foster
Kind of.. :-) Where did you learn that 5.x already have the -STABLE branch? We only have -RELEASE and -CURRENT branches right now, but should have - STABLE branch after 5.2 released. So CURRENT_5? Rus -- www: http://jvds.com | Virtual Servers from just $15/mo MSNM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: CVSUP problems

2003-07-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT), Rus Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kind of.. :-) Where did you learn that 5.x already have the -STABLE branch? We only have -RELEASE and -CURRENT branches right now, but should have - STABLE branch after 5.2 released. So CURRENT_5? No, if you want

vm/map LOR

2003-07-31 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, with yesterday's -current: 1st 0xc6dfd094 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_object.c:434 2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:323 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c032000b,c082f110,c033362f,c033362f,c03334c6) at backtrace+0x17

Re: make rerelease broken?

2003-07-31 Thread David O'Brien
[ Reply-to: set back to list ] On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: There is something dodgy with the crunchgen stuff that leaves behind .o files compiled with the wrong -DFOO defines. Result is things that don't link properly much later. Correct. Our

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-07-31 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-07-31 23:13:33 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-07-31 23:13:33 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-31 23:16:20 - building world TB

Serious 'tr' bug, patch for review included

2003-07-31 Thread Andrey Chernov
This patch address two problems. 1st one is relatively minor: according our own manpage, upper and lower classes must be sorted, but currently not. 2nd one is serious: tr '[:lower:]' '[:upper:]' (and vice versa) currently works only if upper and lower classes have exact the same number

panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) sellck @kern/sys_generic.c:1192

2003-07-31 Thread
Hi, I am running FreeBSD-5.1 current (cvsup from yesterday). I got a SB Audigy 2, using the OSS commercial sound drivers. I have been using the OSS drivers without too much trouble in a 5.1-current system of like 4 weeks ago (but I decided to format and start from scratch). However whenever I

Re: Serious 'tr' bug, patch for review included

2003-07-31 Thread Tim Robbins
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:44:08AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: @@ -208,10 +210,18 @@ if ((func)(cnt)) *p++ = cnt; *p = OOBCH; + n = p - cp-set; s-cnt = 0; - s-state = SET; s-set = cp-set; + if (strcmp(s-str, upper) ==

Re: Serious 'tr' bug, patch for review included

2003-07-31 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:02:04 +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: 8 bits by casting to char. Using charcoll() to sort char arrays may work on little endian machines, but may not on big endian machines. s-set is array of ints, not array of chars. In any case thanx for looking. Also, watch out for

Revised version (was Re: Serious 'tr' bug, patch for reviewincluded)

2003-07-31 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:44:08 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: This patch address two problems. Revides patch version with accurate skipping. Surprisingly, the code is reduced. Only in .: CVS diff -u ./extern.h /usr/src/usr.bin/tr/extern.h --- ./extern.h Fri Jun 14 19:56:52 2002 +++

Re: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fffffe0007e8e000

2003-07-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:48:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: I upgraded the alpha package machines tonight, and one of them fell over shortly after taking load, with the following: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: fe0007e8e000 Two more panics on alpha: panic:

bge driver not recognising BCM 5705M

2003-07-31 Thread David Gilbert
I'm somewhat confused. On a recent 5.1-CURRENT, boot -v gives me: found- vendor=0x14e4, dev=0x165d, revid=0x01 bus=2, slot=0, func=0 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0116, statreg=0x02b0, cachelnsz=8 (dwords) lattimer=0x20 (960 ns), mingnt=0x40

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-07-31 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-01 04:00:06 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-01 04:00:06 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-01 04:02:41 - building world TB --- cd

wi0 still not being a good hostap.

2003-07-31 Thread David Gilbert
Well... I was wrong. Interrups under 5.1-CURRENT still cause the wi0 running in hostap mode to shed it's clients. I'm not familiar with what 802.11b does to authenticate et. al., so I'm posting this ifconfig debug output from both the server and the client in hopes someone else knows what's