Re: ATA: UDMA66, 33 ICRC

2003-09-19 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems =?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Ayrton Senna=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= wrote: This became quite tricky, but the main (and the worst problem) was with ATAng. I have Acer's motherboard and IBM's DTLA. Old driver were saying 'Non-ATA 66 cable or device' and perfectly worked in UDMA-33 mode. New driver didn't

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Jan Srzednicki wrote: As far as problems with dagrab and cdda2wav are conserned - this is because of removal of CDIOCREADAUDIO ioctl in ATAng (see recent thread What's happened to CDIOCREADAUDIO friends) I've seen it (after posting the original mail, though;). Is there going to

Re: What's happened to CDIOCREADAUDIO friends?

2003-09-19 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Vladimir Kushnir wrote: The right way of doing audio graps has been to set the wanted blocksize with CDRIOCSETBLOCKSIZE (not needed if all tracks on the CD is of the same size), then just read from the device. Ioctl's was newer meant to be used to read/write data, its also faster

Re: panic: vm_fault:

2003-09-19 Thread Florian C. Smeets
Jeff Roberson wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Florian C. Smeets wrote: Hi. I get this panic on a system with kernel/world from 03 September. Usually i only run X and xawtv on that system but when i wanted to make world today i got the panic: This was fixed recently. Can you cvsup and rebuild?

Re: [current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-09-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sam is pretty sure that he already fixed this. Is it possible that the tinderbox machine is no longer getting cvs updates? It would seem so. Revision 1.69 of src/sys/net/bridge.c (which fixes this particular problem) is not in the repo on the RTP cluster.

Re: HFS+ driver kernel options?

2003-09-19 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:22:37PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote: Hey... just looking to see what option I need to enable to get HFS+ support... All you need should be here: http://people.freebsd.org/~yar/hfs/ - Christian -- Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Jan Srzednicki
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:02:31AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Jan Srzednicki wrote: As far as problems with dagrab and cdda2wav are conserned - this is because of removal of CDIOCREADAUDIO ioctl in ATAng (see recent thread What's happened to CDIOCREADAUDIO friends) I've

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Jan Srzednicki wrote: dd if=/dev/acdXtY of=trackY bs=2352 Cool. ;) Yes, and that has worked for ages... Could you give me a hint what to put in devd.conf to get acdXtY files created automatically when a CD is inserted? You just need something to open the acdX device (so the

illegal instruction (core dumped) during make cleandir in rescue

2003-09-19 Thread Christoph Kukulies
Strange, very strange. SOeren, you know my hardware, it is the same MB (ASUS P4S8X or the like - off memory). I built a couple of worlds during the past months. But with the recent cvsups I don't get through. make world or make buildworld both fail nearly exactly at the same place during the

Re: 4.9 stability update

2003-09-19 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:21:20PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9. Last night I upgraded my laptop and it hung partway thru the boot (immediately after the pcm0: line in the dmesg below). Powering it off and back on made it boot

Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)

2003-09-19 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume écrivait : Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great. That's good news! Are you going to commit the patch? Yes, the patch is currently being reviewed. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-19 Thread Paul Richards
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:02, M. Warner Losh wrote: Why would you want to package sbin? Where do you see this work going? What problems do you think this will solve? Doing things a top level directory at a time isn't very interesting, but since it looks like a demo, perhaps you could sketch

Re: Base packaging

2003-09-19 Thread Paul Richards
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:10, M. Warner Losh wrote: P.S. How do you handle the packlist generation? The ports system doesn't automatically generate these things, as far as I can tell, and I didn't see anything that you've added to do this. My agenda, if you will, on this is to deal with:

Re: HFS+ driver kernel options?

2003-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
David Leimbach wrote: Hey... just looking to see what option I need to enable to get HFS+ support... I am going to try experimenting with building a ppc cross-build environment and try to install FreeBSD on my iPod and boot from it :) (1) iPod's default to MSDOSFS for compatability

[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-09-19 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-09-19 09:33:15 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-09-19 09:33:15 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-09-19 09:36:34 - building world TB --- cd

Re: HFS+ driver kernel options?

2003-09-19 Thread David Leimbach
On Sep 19, 2003, at 5:45 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: David Leimbach wrote: Hey... just looking to see what option I need to enable to get HFS+ support... I am going to try experimenting with building a ppc cross-build environment and try to install FreeBSD on my iPod and boot from it :) (1) iPod's

Re: HFS+ driver kernel options?

2003-09-19 Thread David Leimbach
On Sep 19, 2003, at 1:55 AM, Christian Brueffer wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:22:37PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote: Hey... just looking to see what option I need to enable to get HFS+ support... All you need should be here: http://people.freebsd.org/~yar/hfs/ Doesn't compile under CURRENT it

Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-09-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Tinderbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64/src/sys/net/bridge.c: In function `bridge_in': /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64/src/sys/net/bridge.c:857: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size *** Error code 1 Please

Random lockups and reboots on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Naumov
Hello I am having some very annoying problems with a FreeBSD 5.1 install. Every 4-6 hours, it either reboots by itself or locks up hard, with the HD led being constantly lit. I've tried looking into the logs, but nothing is written to them before the lockup/reboot, even if I choose boot FreeBSD

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-09-19 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-09-19 11:05:40 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-09-19 11:05:40 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-09-19 11:07:39 - building world TB

Re: Random lockups and reboots on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Naumov
I forgot to add that excessive heat and faulty ram are ruled out, I've checked system temp and it seems to be OK, memtest has also passed all tests completely without giving any errors. It *COULD* theoretically be the HD going bad, but how could I possibly check this? Sincerely, Dan Naumov

Re: ath(4) driver problems with WEP...

2003-09-19 Thread Sam Leffler
Hmm. One other thing I'm seeing is that when I configure a 128 bit key with ifconfig or wicontrol (wicontrol shows all 28 characters -- 0x plus 26 hex characters), ifconfig still thinks it is a 104 bit key. This is because ireq.i_len is 13. You must not have the up to date ifconfig. This

Re: ath(4) driver problems with WEP...

2003-09-19 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:22:13 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: Hmm. One other thing I'm seeing is that when I configure a 128 bit key with ifconfig or wicontrol (wicontrol shows all 28 characters -- 0x plus 26 hex characters), ifconfig still thinks it is a 104 bit key. This is because

Re: 4.9 stability update

2003-09-19 Thread Doug White
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote: We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9. I hope you posted this to -stable :-) -- Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track This panic isn't ATAPICAM related. Could you try the patch below? It's against the cdrtools-devel port but should

Resolved: ATAng problems

2003-09-19 Thread Steve Ames
With the latest updates from Soren my server was always finding the master drive but not the slave. This morning I decided to move the slave drive to secondary master and see if that worked. As I was doing that I noticed the slave was jumpered as Cable Select. I've never had good luck with CS and

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Naumov
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:21, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track This panic isn't ATAPICAM related. Could you try the

Problem with StarOffice 6.0

2003-09-19 Thread Remington
FreeBSD bart 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Mon Sep 15 23:44:16 PDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BART i386 I am currently having a very unusual problem with installing StarOffice 6.0 under -CURRENT. Installation in root works fine. When in normal user install all that

SATA drive lock-up

2003-09-19 Thread Derek Ragona
I have a single SATA drive on an Adaptec 1210SA card. The drive will give a write error warning a few times, then will repeatedly give: ad4: timeout sending command=ca The only recovery is the reset switch, reboot single-user fsck, and then come back up in multiuser. These errors occur with

Re: What's happened to CDIOCREADAUDIO friends?

2003-09-19 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote: I disagree, but that another matter.. How about just doing: dd if=/dev/acdXtY of=trackY bs=2352 Now that cant be simpler and is already present... In XMMS/XINE/cdda2wav/cdparanoia/...? Lots of programs depend on this interface, and not just

Re: ACPI and a Toshiba Tecra 8000

2003-09-19 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Andrew Thompson wrote: Nate Lawson wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Andrew Thompson wrote: 111 sc_cur_scr = sc-cur_scp-index; For a temporary workaround, try changing line 111 to: if (sc-cur_scp == NULL) return (0); This may not help things

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Dan Naumov wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:21, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track This

ATAng no good for me

2003-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
ATA (atapicam also in kernel) doesn't seem to work after the changes in the last 24 hours or so. I have a SCSI system with one ATAPI CD-ROM drive, which gets probed on a good kernel as: ata0-slave: timeout waiting for interrupt ata0-slave: ATAPI identify failed acd0: CDROM CD-532E-B at

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track This panic isn't ATAPICAM related. Could you try the patch below?

Re: ATAng no good for me

2003-09-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:09:03PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: ATA (atapicam also in kernel) doesn't seem to work after the changes in the last 24 hours or so. I have a SCSI system with one ATAPI CD-ROM drive, which gets probed on a good kernel as: sos will probably ask for boot -v output.

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track This panic isn't ATAPICAM related. Could

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Who-hoo, it works!!! Thanks a bunch!!! On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track This panic isn't ATAPICAM

Re:

2003-09-19 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Nevermind, I switched from slave to master of CD-RW; it boots just fine and function fine too. No more weird busy signal at all the time. Time to use my own kernel config.. Cheers, Mezz On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:59:46 -0500, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night, I CVSup'ed and did

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Marius Strobl
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:36:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's triggered by: cdrecord

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:17:21AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: Isn't it still a kernel bug if a user process can trigger a panic? Yes, it seems to be a bug in the mlockall(2) implementation. Backing it out or hindering cdrecord to use it avoids the panic. I already wrote an email to bms@

Re[2]: ATA: UDMA66, 33 ICRC

2003-09-19 Thread Ayrton Senna
This became quite tricky, but the main (and the worst problem) was with ATAng. I have Acer's motherboard and IBM's DTLA. Old driver were saying 'Non-ATA 66 cable or device' and perfectly worked in UDMA-33 mode. New driver didn't said a word, but when it tried to read something,

Re: ATAng still problematic

2003-09-19 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 01:47:44AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:17:21AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: Isn't it still a kernel bug if a user process can trigger a panic? Yes, it seems to be a bug in the mlockall(2) implementation. Backing it out or hindering

Re: ATAng no good for me

2003-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:09:03PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: ATA (atapicam also in kernel) doesn't seem to work after the changes in the last 24 hours or so. I have a SCSI system with one ATAPI CD-ROM drive, which gets probed on a good kernel

Re: 09/18 -CURRENT does not boot off SATA

2003-09-19 Thread Will Andrews
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 08:48:57PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote: My -CURRENT workstation won't boot off the WD Raptor 36GB disk, which is on a SiI 3112A SATA-150 controller. This was working with a kernel in early July. {build,install}{world,kernel} completed. Fortunately, it seems I can still