TB --- 2014-04-24 13:09:23 - tinderbox 2.21 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2014-04-24 13:09:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Fixed by r264883 sorry for the breakage.
- Original Message -
From: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org
To: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org; curr...@freebsd.org;
i...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:48 PM
Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64
TB
Hi,
I can't build current on i386 (last tried revision is 264886) for couple
of days. Every time trying to build with making `make clean` and rm'ing
/usr/obj first.
The first error is appearing when building MCAsmBackend.cpp:
/../contrib/llvm/lib/MC/MCAsmBackend.cpp -o MCAsmBackend.o
In
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion of
software.
Is FreeBSD going to support the
On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion of
On 24 Apr 2014, at 19:05, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
I can't build current on i386 (last tried revision is 264886) for couple of
days. Every time trying to build with making `make clean` and rm'ing /usr/obj
first.
The first error is appearing when building
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
OpenSSL, I'd
like
On 04/24/14 17:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation,
called LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the
code of OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in
On 24 Apr 2014, at 22:35, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of
OpenSSL, I'd
like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD
There is info feed also
http://opensslrampage.org/
Too early to say what will come out of it, but has some
promising qualities certainly.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/OpenSSL-vs-LibreSSL-OpenBSD-tp5906272p5906317.html
Sent from the freebsd-current
On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I try to trim my NanoBSD install as much as possible without going to add
rm /usr/bin/as to customization steps (ok, I remove /usr/include and
/usr/lib/*.a, but it I don't want cherry-pick
On Apr 24, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 24 Apr 2014, at 22:35, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called
LibreSSL. As
OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:05:40PM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
We need to discuss the use of comic sans font across our web properties
first.
-Alfred
You, sir, win 2 internets.
- Justin
seconded.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
13 matches
Mail list logo
