Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB (aka regession is r219737)

2012-03-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:41:35PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:24:13 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB (aka regession is r219737)

2012-03-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > [...] > > > and > > > > 10 remove that block : > > >

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > when a package can be installed in both i386 and amd64 > > > > and maybe in the Makefile: > > > > PKGARCH=i386 amd64 > > > > or > > > >

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:59:38PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Wed, 21 Mar 2012 > 14:59:20 +0100): > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:34:03PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> Quoting Bruce Cran (from Tue, 20 Mar 20

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:34:03PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Bruce Cran (from Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:26:42 +): > > > On 20 Mar 2012, at 10:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > >> i386-32 and amd64-64 is weird and confusing. > >> > >> IMO, you should go either with x86-{32,64} n

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:18:12PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/03/2012 16:39 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:20:52AM -0500, Chuck Burns wrote: > >> We should probably pad the version number, and shorten things up.. > >> si

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:20:52AM -0500, Chuck Burns wrote: > We should probably pad the version number, and shorten things up.. > similar to: > > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x86.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x64.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc64.pkg > package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ar

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35:08PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > In order to identify architectures I need to find a uniq id for every > possibilities (for pkgng) > > here is the identification I propose: > > arch-class-os-majorversion(-archi_specific_

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:24:37AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20120319215802.gc1...@azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > >On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35:08PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> In ord

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-19 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:01:23PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In order to identify architectures I need to find a uniq id for every > > possibilities (for pkgng) > &g

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-19 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35:08PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > In order to identify architectures I need to find a uniq id for every > possibilities (for pkgng) > > here is the identification I propose: > > arch-class-os-majorversion(-archi_specific_

ABI/architecture identification for packages

2012-03-19 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, In order to identify architectures I need to find a uniq id for every possibilities (for pkgng) here is the identification I propose: arch-class-os-majorversion(-archi_specific_extension) arch can be one of the following: - x86 for i386 and amd64 (discussed with kib) - powerpc for powe

Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

2012-03-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:08:52PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > > On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > >>> In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is > >>> simpler than

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta8 is out

2012-03-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, We just released beta8 of pkgng, it comes with the usual fixes and some new features: pkg set is a new subcommand to modify the content of the local package database, currently only modifying -a [01] the status wether the package as been installed as a dependency or direct can be done. pkg c

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1^6 is out

2012-02-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:53:42PM -0200, Renato Botelho wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > beta6 is now out with the following changes: > > > > * pkg register: now run inside a transaction, this speeds up things a lot > > (thanks

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1^6 is out

2012-02-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
beta6 is now out with the following changes: * pkg register: now run inside a transaction, this speeds up things a lot (thanks avg) * pkg version: -v now print name-version to match behaviour of legacy pkg_version * pkg register: fix flatsize calculation * new pkg-updating(1) man page (thanks be

Re: Beta 3 still not OK

2012-02-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:08:28PM -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > Em Sáb, 2012-02-11 às 00:38 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu: > > > Sorry pkg add was broken in beta2 this release fixes it. > > > > Changes: > > * fix pkg add (it is been broken during bet

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1^Wbeta2 is out

2012-02-10 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:15:34PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 10 February 2012 09:51, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > As said in the first announcement there will be lots of beta release before > > rc > > and then stable > > > > the second one is n

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1^Wbeta2^W3 is out

2012-02-10 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Sorry pkg add was broken in beta2 this release fixes it. Changes: * fix pkg add (it is been broken during beta2 sorry about that) * fix manifest emitter: now really emit the pkg-message in message no more description * add %M to pkg query to show messages * concat all pkg-messages and show it on

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1^Wbeta2 is out

2012-02-10 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
As said in the first announcement there will be lots of beta release before rc and then stable the second one is now out with the following changes: * update bundled sqlite to 3.7.10 * add -n to pkg create to avoid packing already packed packages * Fix rc script handling * safer sbuf usage (this f

[CFT] pw(8) using pw/gr API from libutil

2012-02-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, I have been modifying pw(8) it order for it to user the pw_* and gr_* function from libutil, to: avoid code duplication have a single API to manipulate user/group things. I have been using this version for a while now and it works quite well to me, I'm just missing testing in real NIS env

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

2012-01-31 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:23:35AM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote: > On 30.01.2012 16:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the > > ports tree (disabled by default). > > > > 1/ Why pkgng?

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

2012-01-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:27:20AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote: > > On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote: > > > The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng): > > > https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaste

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

2012-01-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:16:00PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the > > ports tree (disabled by default). > > > > 1/ Why p

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

2012-01-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something > > like > > raw output for info or query) I do like the idea, please

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

2012-01-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:43:58AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > This looks great! > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > > Sample output of pkg info: > > > > $ pkg info -f libreoffice: > > Name

[HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out

2012-01-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the ports tree (disabled by default). 1/ Why pkgng? Our current pkg_install tools are showing their age, are hard to maintain, and they lack features: - missing metadata - no upgrade support - no repository sup

flex or reflex

2012-01-08 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I am willing to update our flex in base, my first motivation is to be able to have reentrant lexer in base, I first went to the http://flex.sourceforge.net derivative from flex 2.5.4, I've imported it in contrib, and I'm able to build the whole base using the 2.5.35 version (almost vanilla) an

Re: VM images for FreeBSD

2011-12-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:52:40AM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > 2011/12/21 Baptiste Daroussin > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > > > 2011/12/19 Adrian Chadd > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >

Re: VM images for FreeBSD

2011-12-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > 2011/12/19 Adrian Chadd > > > Hi, > > > > Hm, so this lets us create a virtualbox image from what, a set of > > install tarballs? Or /usr/src build? > > > > I'm using cross-build and installation from sources dir (which is afte

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-14 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:31:15PM +0100, Daniel Horecki wrote: > Lucas Holt writes: > > > There is also mirports from MirBSD that is supported on MirBSD, > > MidnightBSD, and Mac OS X. They also got a pkgsrc port going recently. The > > problem is that projects have specific needs that other

Re: Upgrade contributed gperf, m4 and flex

2011-12-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:16:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > and last: upgrade flex to the latest upstream version (it will need the m4 > > upgrade) while here I'll move back flex to contrib/ >

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-12-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > I wonder why the waiting_threads stuff is needed at all. The cv could > > > > be woken up unconditionally everytime. What is the reason for the > > > > cv_wa

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:46:36PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > With the help of cognet, I

Re: [patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:05:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:43:20 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple > > openable > > device, that mea

[patch] turning devctl into a "multiple openable" device

2011-11-30 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple openable device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devctl in multiple programs, for example hald and everythings that want to receive notification from the device won't need to depend on haveing devd running.

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-11-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > Baptiste, > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit > > > after r228114. > > > > &g

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-11-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > Hello! > > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit > after r228114. > > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline: > > 1) just build & link gdb with libedit > > OR > > 2) re-import libreadli

Upgrade contributed gperf, m4 and flex

2011-11-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I plan to upgrade gperf to the latest GPLv2 version: 3.0.3. I also plan to upgrade m4 syncing code from openbsd, taking code from netbsd (improve gnu m4 compatibility). and last: upgrade flex to the latest upstream version (it will need the m4 upgrade) while here I'll move back flex to contrib

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB (aka regession is r219737)

2011-11-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: [...] > and > > 10 remove that block : > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/workaround-to-boot-p5ne.diff > > Yeah, the problem is that NVIDIA chipsets seem to have really odd behavior in > that once you turn MSI mapping on for a given n

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB (aka regession is r219737)

2011-11-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:10:58PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > > the result is: > > > > > db>

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB (aka regession is r219737)

2011-11-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > the result is: > > > > db> show intrcnt > > > > cpu0: timer4510 > > > > irq256: hdac0 1 &

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-09-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > the result is: > > > db> show intrcnt > > > cpu0: timer4510 > > > irq256: hdac0 1 > > > cpu3: timer 29 > > > cpu1: timer 3036 > > > cpu2: timer

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-09-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
> > the result is: > > db> show intrcnt > > cpu0: timer4510 > > irq256: hdac0 1 > > cpu3: timer 29 > > cpu1: timer 3036 > > cpu2: timer 31 > > db> > > > > I did break at the mountfrom> prompt > > If I break before I only have the cpu0 and irq256 entries. > > Hmmm, is there any w

Re: bsdtar(1) can't extract new ISO images

2011-08-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:37:38 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:02:49 +0200, Martin Matuska wrote: The error is in FreeBSD ISO images. They are created using makefs and that doesn't create ISO files that strictly comple to the ECMA-119 (ISO9660 standard). I have al

Re: bsdtar(1) can't extract new ISO images

2011-08-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:02:49 +0200, Martin Matuska wrote: The error is in FreeBSD ISO images. They are created using makefs and that doesn't create ISO files that strictly comple to the ECMA-119 (ISO9660 standard). I have already filed a PR at NetBSD (bin/45217): http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-26 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:44:51 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:40:20 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:03:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:14:12 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +,

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-26 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:03:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:14:12 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Darous

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Trying to upgrade

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:37:36 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Darous

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Trying to upgrade

Re: No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable to 9-current lead be to some important problems. I'm have tried both from sources (svn buildworld etc.) and from me

No disks usable on a P5NE MB

2011-07-24 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable to 9-current lead be to some important problems. I'm have tried both from sources (svn buildworld etc.) and from memdisk provided by allbsd.org. The motherboard is ASUS P5N-E SLI ACPI BIOS Revision 0901 more informations here : http://peop

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-31 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/31 Andriy Gapon : > on 29/03/2011 23:29 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: >> ok let's try to say it simpler :) the main goal is to keep it simple >> for now, simple and rock solid, so that we can replace pkg_install and >> do some cleanup in the ports tree, ad

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/29 Baptiste Daroussin : > 2011/3/29 Andriy Gapon : >> on 28/03/2011 21:22 Julien Laffaye said the following: >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>>> III. Package naming that includes architecture, major OS version (for

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/29 Andriy Gapon : > on 28/03/2011 21:22 Julien Laffaye said the following: >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: III. Package naming that includes architecture, major OS version (for API/ABI), maybe more. >>> >>> This could be provided in the manifest. Do

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/29 Tim Kientzle : > II. Package signing. That would be really nice. >>> >>> Right know we only planned to sign the repo database, so we can trust >>> the sah256 of the packages stored in the database. Then if the package >>> has the same sha256 as the one in the repo database i

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/25 Yuri : > On 03/25/2011 03:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >> Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge >> contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a >> rewrite of pkg_install. >> >> pkgng is a bina

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/25 Jason Helfman : > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:18:24PM +, Julien Laffaye thus spake: >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >>> >>> On 2011-Mar-25, 17:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> >>>> if you are

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/25 Julien Laffaye : > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> On 25/03/2011 11:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >>>  In term of technology we decided to use a sqlite3 database, and to >>>  prevent potential trolling, sqlite3 is used in it

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/25 Pietro Cerutti : > On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote: >> >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep the /var/db/pkg//xxx >> >>> files even with pkgng and only use the DB as a way to speed up some work >> >>> (so >> >>> the DB corruption just requires to run pkg2ng), or are y

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/25 Alexander Leidinger : > Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Fri, 25 Mar 2011 > 11:11:11 +0100): > >> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD. > > I didn't had a look at it, just some comments about some parts you > explained. > &

[ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, miwi@ launched the new thing called Experimental Call For Testing, it's our turn :) Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge contributor) have been working since the end of the last GSoC on a rewrite of pkg_install. pkgng is a binary package manager written from

Re: Request for review/testing: switching the default installer

2011-03-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/3 Paul Schenkeveld : > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:36:58AM -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 02/28/11 09:20, John Baldwin wrote: >> > On Monday, February 28, 2011 9:49:07 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> >> There are some changes to the distribution format involved in this >> >> patch, which

Re: [PATCH] OpenSolaris/ZFS: C++ compatibility

2011-02-08 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
> I've developed similar API during HAST work, maybe it is a good starting > point? src/sbin/hastd/nv.{c,h}. > What about pushing this into some public libraries, I think this could be usefull in libc ou libutil or something like that? regards, Bapt ___

Re: Document EVFILT_FS and VQ_*

2010-09-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2010/9/21 John Baldwin : > On Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:22:24 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For a projects I needed to use EVFILT_FS and saw that it hasn't been >> documented >> so here is a patch to document it http://planet.etoilebsd.net/

Document EVFILT_FS and VQ_*

2010-09-21 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, For a projects I needed to use EVFILT_FS and saw that it hasn't been documented so here is a patch to document it http://planet.etoilebsd.net/kqueue.2.diff It is based on the commit message for the implementation of EVFILT_FS, sorry I don't know how to better document it (http://lists.freebsd

Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base

2010-08-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
> zsh     less POSIX-compliant, oddly deviant from "standard" >        bourne-derived shells which makes graybeards break out in hives >        also, see ruby under user community ZSH has a POSIX-compliant interface through emulate -L sh or by naming (linking) zsh binary sh. even if the man page

<    1   2   3   4   5