Hi Jason,
This is really a -questions question, not a -current question.
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Jason Mitchell wrote:
Does anyone know of a tutorial or more detailed instructions on how to use
NAT and IP masquerading in 3.4?
"IP masquerading" is what the linux people call NAT. They are the
Problem report booting 4.0-RELEASE follows.
/boot.config: -P
Keyboard: yes
BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01
Console: internal video/keyboard
BIOS drive A: is disk0
BIOS drive C: is disk1
BIOS 639kB/56256kB available memory
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 0.7
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 07:52:18AM +0100, Thierry.herbelot wrote:
Joe Abley wrote:
Problem report booting 4.0-RELEASE follows.
I had the exact same error message trying to boot from a floppy where I
had tried to dd the full boot.flp (2,8 Megs is just too much for a
normal floppy
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 11:34 PM +1300 2000/1/22, Joe Abley wrote:
This should give you a relative performance metric between the servers
you measured, hopefully with local network performance variations
cancelled out by the fact that all tests
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 06:20:38PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote:
Anyway, if multi CNAME is no good then do:
cvsup IN A198.104.92.71 ; cvsup1.freebsd.org
cvsup IN A205.149.189.91 ; cvsup2.freebsd.org
... and so on
This is legal, is
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 05:23:17PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
You don't even need to modify the protocol. Just write a small
tcp program that times the 3 way handshake on open to all the
servers, take the one with the sortest time and spit that out
for the user to stuff in his cvsupfile.
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 01:23:05PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I just rebooted both machines and it didn't fix the problem. I did a
packet trace on both boxes and there does indeed appear to be packet loss.
Sorry if this is stating the obvious, but I've seen more than one
clueful
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 12:05:43PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On your next CVSup, /usr/sbin/sendmail will look for sendmail.cf in
/etc/mail/ , not /etc/.
Then change was made because the current offical Sendmail Inc. version
uses /var/mail/ and when we upgrade our repository to that
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 11:21:52AM -0700, Sean Eric Fagan wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you
write:
only one comment. i remove people from the lists whenever
their email bounces. the threshhold is approximately 30 messages in a
24 hour period. mail may bounce due to DNS
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 11:05:49PM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
There is breakage in the new FICL. This fixes it...
[awk diff]
I remember a long time ago someone asked me to make some modifications
to softcore.awk to compress
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
There is breakage in the new FICL. This fixes it...
[awk diff]
I remember a long time ago someone asked me to make some modifications
to softcore.awk to compress the textual ficl keywords by eliminating
double-spaces and newlines,
Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[hub.freebsd.org now blocking IP adresses on the DUL]
If you use your ISP's mailer as a "smarthost", you will avoid this
problem.
Thos of us in the anti-spam community think thsat this is a Good
Thing.
One of us, at least, evidently.
How much
Hi,
From /sys/coda/coda.h on 3.2-STABLE, it looks like the version in the tree
is 3.1.
At http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/download.html#gpl_notice it is mentioned
that version 5 clients and servers are not backwards compatible
with version 4 (and by inference, previous versions, hence my first
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 03:51:07AM +, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 2 Jun 1999 17:20:38 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current you wrote:
[mailbagging]
Do you make checks to see that the person does not login twice with the
same account name ?
Yes. Simultaneous logins are prohibited --
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 02:16:55PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
this is less and less of a problem because
if you lose your link on PPP
you are liable to get a differetn IP address on your redial.
Not true. Only if you're using a dynamic IP address setup. Most
business connections have
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 11:03:05PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote:
When it comes down to it, there is very little justification for a static
address. The one I most commonly hear is so we can do SMTP mail delivery
to the customer, but even that doesn't mandate use of static addressing --
we
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700, k...@lyris.com wrote:
That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a
reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious
place.
Check the archives for freebsd-current, freebsd-hackers and freebsd-mobile.
Hi,
CLEAR is operating a pretty full mirror of ftp.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/
at ftp.clear.net.nz:/pub/FreeBSD/.
Dan Langille has kindly made ftp.nz.freebsd.org a CNAME to ftp.clear.net.nz
to make this easier to find.
Just thought I'd mention it -- I haven't done a clean install for a long
time,
(he asked :)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:29:16PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:56 +0200, Mark Murray m...@grondar.za said:
Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
there difficulties that make this impossible?
Yes, there
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 02:34:51PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
And you didn't know that the RIP spec is even older, and was publicly
available via an RFC (the same as OSPF?)
But, of course, RIP sucks in many well-known ways.
I can't quite figure why they stuck the word open in there, because it
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:36:09AM +0930, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
Most importantly:
- Recent values of GateD are distributed under a very unfriendly
license.
And the last free version is hideous in the extreme.
There's also zebra, in ports
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 09:45:29PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote:
Do you have an empty /usr/X11R6/include?
Ah, yes I do. Thanks for that :)
The Makefile assumes you have the
header files if the directory /usr/X11R6/include is present and tries to
build the X version of doscmd. This assumption may
Hi,
I've been trying to make buildworld on an aged Compaq DX2 (using newly-
supped CURRENT source) for about a week now, and (modulo the few egcs-looking
failures early on) I am now stuck with compilation failures in doscmd.
I have completely removed /usr/obj/* prior to starting, each time, and
On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 03:16:41AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
David O'Brien obr...@nuxi.com writes:
I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base
system -- all 4 said yes. Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77
to the base system this weekend.
I beg
Is there any work in progress on sys/pccard/*?
I'm using a Gateway Solo for the week which has the PCI/cardbus bridge
mentioned in the title, and I have been getting spurious results with
4.0-CURRENT (supped a couple of days ago).
If there are some patches in test which might enhance support for
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 02:28:20PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
I am planning on adding the Wide-DHCP client to src/contrib/ and
src/sbin/ in a few days.
I have it bmaked and ready go to. I have choosen the WIDE client because
it is much smaller space-wise than the ISC client and its
I've been using amd on bleeding-edge current for the past year or so with
no problems - the servers in my case are Solaris 2.5.1 boxes.
I remember becoming extremely confused when I configured my first amd map
file, since there was no coherent documentation to be found at the time, but
I ended up
28 matches
Mail list logo
