AMD Ryzen 5 5600G graphics acceleration fails now on -current

Greetings, I have been happily using an AMD 5600G box for about 9 months on -current with zero hiccups. After performing my quarterly git pull + buildworld + installworld + pkg update + pkg upgrade, no packages that require graphics work. This is broad based, from kitty to mpv, thunderbird,

Re: upgrade stable/12 -> stable/13 zfs + boot partition Mediasize 64K

On 2/11/21 9:34 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: On Feb 11, 2021, at 7:13 PM, Russell L. Carter wrote: root@terpsichore> gpart show => 34 625142381 da0 GPT (298G) 341281 freebsd-boot (64K) 16283886082 freebsd-swap (4.0G) 8388770 61675364

Re: upgrade stable/12 -> stable/13 zfs + boot partition Mediasize 64K

On 2/11/21 7:46 PM, Dennis Clarke via freebsd-current wrote: On 2/11/21 8:57 PM, Gary Palmer wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:34:40PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: Greetings, I really want to jump from stable/12 to stable/13 but one thing is causing a hesitancy. And that is, my main

Re: upgrade stable/12 -> stable/13 zfs + boot partition Mediasize 64K

On 2/11/21 5:43 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: Sorry, meant 256 KB or 512 KB, not MB! On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:43 PM Freddie Cash wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:35 PM Russell L. Carter wrote: Greetings, I really want to jump from stable/12 to stable/13 but one thing is causing a hesitancy

upgrade stable/12 -> stable/13 zfs + boot partition Mediasize 64K

Greetings, I really want to jump from stable/12 to stable/13 but one thing is causing a hesitancy. And that is, my main raidz2 system has a system boot zfs mirror pair that has boot partition size (Mediasize) of 64K, and when I tried to zpool upgrade that pool a year or 2 ago I got some scary

Re: Which branch in git is 13.0-current?

On 1/23/21 10:22 AM, driesm.michi...@gmail.com wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org On Behalf Of Malcolm Matalka Sent: Saturday, 23 January 2021 17:43 To: FreeBSD Current Subject: Which branch in git is 13.0-current? I upgraded my src checkout to git,

Re: Plans for git

On 2020-09-20 12:28, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Just my +100500 to this. > > On 20/09/2020 18:03, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> On 2020-09-19, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: >> >>> Hrm. Maybe what I hear others saying, tho, and not entirely being replied >>> to is just a nice concise document of the

Re: Documentation regarding NFSv4

On 2020-09-18 16:28, Rick Macklem wrote: > Oh, and I forgot to mention name<->id# mapping. > If using AUTH_SYS (not kerberos), then you have the > choice of running "nfsuserd" or setting these two sysctls to 1. > vfs.nfs.enable_uidtostring=1 > vfs.nfsd.enable_stringtouid=1 > --> This makes the

Re: TLS certificates for NFS-over-TLS floating client

So ok, it's good to code to RFCs. OTOH, state actors are a thing now. Alice & Bob's protocols need to be perfect. State actors watch for mistakes. Here I commit heresy, by A) top posting, and B) by just saying, why not make it easy, first, to tunnel NFSv4 sessions through e.g. net/wireguard

Re: how to mark llvm* forbidden?

On 04/06/17 10:26, Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:18:37PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: On 04/05/17 15:32, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:51:40 + Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:42:16AM -0700, Chris H wrote: OK I'm c

Re: how to mark llvm* forbidden?

On 04/05/17 15:32, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:51:40 + Brooks Davis wrote On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:42:16AM -0700, Chris H wrote: OK I'm chasing -CURRENT, and I performed an initial install, followed by a new world/kernel && ports about a mos ago. Last

Re: NFS 4.1

On 01/17/17 10:38, Michael Ware wrote: Good day, Does anyone know if NFS 4.1 (not 4.0) is available in FreeBSD 11? I have not been able to find any documentation around this. Thanks Yes, though I'm not sure what specific feature you're looking for. FreeBSD interoperates with my linux NFS 4.1

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

On 04/19/16 11:22, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 04/19/16 10:55, Roger Marquis wrote: Please, consider ops and admins, who must support old installations, often made by other, not-reachable, people, and stuff like this, Ops and admins such as myself are exactly the ones who will benefit most

Re: Intel Haswell support - Any updates?

On 09/17/15 10:40, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Thursday, September 17, 2015 a las 11:02:07AM -0400, Kris Moore escribió: On 09/17/2015 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Thursday, September 17, 2015 a las 10:41:43PM +0900, Lundberg, Johannes escribió: Same here. I would personally

Re: Intel Haswell support - Any updates?

On 09/17/15 11:42, Adrian Chadd wrote: run -HEAD on it. The wifi works great (it's atheros.) Excellent to hear. When I get back from traveling I'll bring up -HEAD. Thanks, Russell All that's missing is haswell graphics. -a On 17 September 2015 at 11:23, Russell L. Carter <r

building stable/10 on -current

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On current r273808, make buildworld in a stable/10 tree fails with: building shared library libc.so.7 /usr/bin/ld: _umtx_unlock.So: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `SYS__umtx_unlock' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with

buildworld fails: spa_maxblocksize

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So the ztest link fails looking for spa_maxblocksize, which is defined in sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa_misc.c I don't see which lib it is included in. One of zpool, zfs, or zfs_core, apparently. As my build system is root on

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/14 03:07, Beeblebrox wrote: * I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4 [...] PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote: Hi Russ, PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0 Possibly need to arrange for mount_nfs to see -o nfsv4 (I use

Re: NFS installworld failures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ian, On 10/06/14 08:29, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 20:37 -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: [...] I intermittently run into installworld failures, usually in sys/boot/i386 but occasionally e.g. cddl/lib where the install targets

NFS installworld failures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, Am I the only one attempting to maintain a local cluster using a buildworld server and mounting /usr/src/ and /usr/obj/ via NFS? I intermittently run into installworld failures, usually in sys/boot/i386 but occasionally e.g. cddl/lib

Re: NFS installworld failures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/05/14 20:51, David Wolfskill wrote: On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 08:37:26PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: Greetings, Am I the only one attempting to maintain a local cluster using a buildworld server and mounting /usr/src/ and /usr/obj/ via

Re: CURRENT: buildworld fails to compile: cannot find -lctf cc: error: linker command failed [libproc.so.3]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/14 15:58, Mark Johnston wrote: On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Mark Johnston ma...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:39:37PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Mark Johnston ma...@freebsd.org wrote:

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

On 08/13/14 17:37, Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote: On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:19:16 -0700 Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: Thiago, I really liked the blog articles you wrote: http://thiagoperrotta.wordpress.com/2014/07/20/here-be-dragons-freebsd-overview-part-i/

Re: Realtek 8139B detected

Well, um, if you look for messages from me last June and then again several times recently you'll find we are a club of three, at least. I can't actually manually ifconfig it either, it comes up the first time fine, but I can wedge my machine with a few large transfers. I got a couple of hints

Re: STABLE-CURRENT rl fails

into the debugger after the first time rl0 wedged, but before the whole system wedged tight? Way at the bottom is the original dmesg. Best, Russell : : On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Russell L. Carter wrote: : : rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fbf7 flags 3 len 2992 max 1514) : rl0: discard

Re: STABLE-CURRENT rl fails

Ok-dokey, over to linux it goes. Rats. Russell : : : Perhaps there's a nice search string that will cough up what : to do, if there's hope? This laptop is perfectly stable with : STABLE. (But no sound or acpi...) : : Thanks, : Russell : : : : : Trial upgrade from a laptop running

Re: STABLE-CURRENT rl fails

2003, Russell L. Carter wrote: : : rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fbf7 flags 3 len 2992 max 1514) : rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fbf7 flags 3 len 2992 max 1514) : rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 2e3d flags 3 len 55442 max 1514) : rl0: discard oversize frame (ether

Re: STABLE-CURRENT rl fails

Perhaps there's a nice search string that will cough up what to do, if there's hope? This laptop is perfectly stable with STABLE. (But no sound or acpi...) Thanks, Russell : Trial upgrade from a laptop running stable just fine for the last : six months to current (GENERIC) is still

STABLE-CURRENT rl fails

Trial upgrade from a laptop running stable just fine for the last six months to current (GENERIC) is still failing with the same symptoms: On board rl0 comes up just fine, but a transfer hangs after about 150KB or so. After a minute or two, the laptop reboots. That's at 100BaseTX, plus the

Re: Problem installing on T20

%Wm Brian McCane wrote: % % I have an IBM T20 laptop that I want to run FreeBSD on. I have run % %BTW, I just found that this is covered on the FAQ. Otay, I must be blind. Where in http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/book.html is this? Thanks! Russell %-- %Daniel C. Sobral

Re: Optimisation patch

Hi folks, %On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: % % Any objections to the following? % %I don't mind at all ... I was wondering about just taking out the ability %to even USE -O2 in the compiler, but there're probably *some* non-kernel %related reasons for using it, and we shouldn't block

Jumped across a month and left dc behind.

I've been using the dc driver without a hitch but when I updated to current two days ago dc stopped working. Symptoms are no link light on the hub and ifconfig reports no-carrier. Lights are on on the NIC though. Enumerating the varieties of media/mediaopt has no effect. Fortunately, there

Re: Problems installing FreeBSD 4.0 20000125-CURRENT

% %On 27-Jan-2000 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: % | % | 3. On the first reboot after installing, the keyboard was in a funny % | state. % | % | Urk, can't reproduce it. I need a reproducible sequence of operations % | before we'll have any hope of tackling this one. % | % | Control-alt-del

Re: FIC SD-11 not happy with ata

% %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: % % %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: % % % % % % I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now: %... % % % )(*$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test % things like IO... gr % %We in the computer hardware business have

Re: FIC SD-11 not happy with ata

% %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: % % %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: % % % % % % I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now: %... % % % )(*$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test % things like IO... gr % %We in the computer hardware business have

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent. Russell To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

|From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 11:23:14 2000 | |In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], |Russell L. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent. | |Did this problem just start, or has it been there for awhile? I |haven't changed

FIC SD-11 not happy with ata

I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now: ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495WARNING: WAIT_READY active=ATA_ACTIVE_ATA falling back to

Re: FIC SD-11 not happy with ata

%It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: % %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote: % % % % I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now: % % % % ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying % % ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying % % ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying

Re: Still system hangs, but different

% %: %:On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 10:21:48AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: %: Everyone, make sure you are using at least version 1.47 of %: ffs_softdep.c. %: %:I have. % %Wait a sec. I've reviewed all the messages from you and I think something %got mixed together. I'm not

-current buildworld dies, retch.

Otay, please tell me how to fix: === usr.sbin/ifmcstat cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.c gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.8 ifmcstat.8.gz /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.c: In function `main':

Re: emacs / ncurses - problem somewhere

|Hi, | |Ever since the libtermcap / libncurses consolidation, change emacs has |problems positioning the cursor and properly updating the screen for |character-only devices like the console. It also affects the display |in an xterm in non-X mode, i.e., when DISPLAY is *not* set. | |This is emacs

Re: emacs / ncurses - problem somewhere

|"Russell L. Carter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Yup! And also for 19.34b... I've searched all over for the | source of this problem, glad to know I'm not alone. However, | it only affects one of my three -current boxes, so apparently there is | bit of cruft lying around, but

Re: SMP and threads...

|"David E. Cross" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: |I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one processor. |I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and there was a |solution, I think it involved a patch. | |Any pointers? | |http://lt.tar.com And don't be turned off by

Re: Code Crusader 2.0.x on FreeBSD

%Hmm, I missed that. I took -lc out, but now I get this: % [...] %/usr/local/lib/liblthread.so.0: undefined reference to `_sigsuspend' %/usr/local/lib/liblthread.so.0: undefined reference to `_nanosleep' %/usr/local/lib/liblthread.so.0: undefined reference to `_fork'

Re: compiler specs for -pthread/-kthread

%On Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 03:16:01PM -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: % To facilate auto detection of the local threading environment, % it would be nice if the -?thread options set all the necessary % compiler/linker flags. It is a common practace for such % options to specify both compilation and

Re: Problems with ELF Emacs

%I'm running -current from a couple of weeks ago. I recently re-compiled %XFree86 to ELF - which works, and re-compiled emacs-19.34b - which won't %work with X11, though it does work inside an Xterm. My old aout emacs %still works (with old aout libraries - the re-compiled aout libraries %seem

Re: SMP and SO5.0

John Dyson extemporised: %Julian Elischer said: % % % On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote: % You may try my patch at http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi, which would allow % linux threads to run on SMP. % % I've gone through these patches and I can see that they are really needed % for SMP

Re: gcc

%On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: % % I for one would love to see 2.8.1 or newer in the tree for my own, % selfish reasons. Many ports (new architectures) would benefit from % this. % % Is that to say that you prefer it over egcs 1.1.1? If so, why? % %I have found egcs to be

Re: thread-package strategy

% % You've probably already seen this: % % Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level % Management of Parallelism. % url:http://www.acm.org/pubs/citations/proceedings/ops/121132/p95-anderson/ % %And here is the abstract: % %

Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)

[...] %We spend so much of our time looking up our own collective asses searching %for the meaning of life that it is no wonder FreeBSD doesn't feel like it %has a clear direction for the future. All people seem to want to do is %stomp on others who try to contribute something. Come on John,

Re: Using LinuxThreads

|Maybe having just one pthread.h that pulls in the required headers |based on a switch (eg. -DLINUXTHREADS) is the way to go? Doing this makes linuxthread support more or less official, I would think. I am for it. Russell | |-- |Richard Seamman, Jr. email: d...@tar.com |5182 N.

Re: Using LinuxThreads

d...@tar.com said: %For kernel threading you just use libc. Whether or not libc generates % thread safe (re-entrant) calls depends on whether its also linked %with a library that 1) sets __isthreaded to a non-zero value, 2) has a %_spinlock() implementationm, and 3) implements the functions

threads, exceptions, and current

Hi, I'm trying to track down a problem with threads, C++ exceptions and ACE on -current. Is the appended little program supposed to work? If not, why not? It SIGABRTs immediately after the last throw with egcs-2.95.2, and also with a month old or so egcs-2.91.66, stock cc. Also with