with a -STABLE as of last night at 1:30 AM EST the ata driver refuses to
configure my DVD drive. Here is the output of a dmesg:
ad0: 8063MB [16383/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33
ad1: 13029MB [26473/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA66
ad2: 14655MB [29777/16/63] at ata1-slave UDMA66
ata0-slave: <\M-vO\M-
It seems Allen Pulsifer wrote:
> According to the DPTA-3x spec from IBM, if the drive has fully entered
> Standby mode, it can take up to 31 seconds for it to spin back up.
> (See sections 3.3.6.1 and 13.0). Other drive models may take even
> longer, and even after the drive is back up, it ma
]
> Cc: Richard Seaman Jr.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ATA driver problem?? (lost disk contact)
>
>
> It seems Dave J. Boers wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > > There is no way to see if the disk was in suspend mode, you can
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 11:20:51PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> Sorry,
>
> I found a rather easy workaround. Disable DMA for
> the disks in the BIOS ... But I still wonder why
> enable/disable ATA DMA in kernel has no effect for
> this crash. Why does only the BIOS disable help ?
Purely a wil
It seems Martin Blapp wrote:
>
> Sorry,
>
> I found a rather easy workaround. Disable DMA for
> the disks in the BIOS ... But I still wonder why
> enable/disable ATA DMA in kernel has no effect for
> this crash. Why does only the BIOS disable help ?
No idea, I have to study AMD's southbridge fi
Sorry,
I found a rather easy workaround. Disable DMA for
the disks in the BIOS ... But I still wonder why
enable/disable ATA DMA in kernel has no effect for
this crash. Why does only the BIOS disable help ?
ata-pci0: at device 7.1 on pci0
ata-pci0: Busmastering DMA supported
ata0 at 0x01f0 irq
It seems Dave J. Boers wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > There is no way to see if the disk was in suspend mode, you can
> > give it a command and se how long it takes before it comes back :)
> >
> > The problem here is that it takes the command and OK's
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> There is no way to see if the disk was in suspend mode, you can
> give it a command and se how long it takes before it comes back :)
>
> The problem here is that it takes the command and OK's it, but it
> takes the spinuptime + over
It seems Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Because the wd driver has a 10 secs timeout, and ata has 5 secs.
> > I think the easiest way to "solve" this is to increase the
> > timeout to 10-15 secs, as little as I want to do that...
It seems Martin Blapp wrote:
> I've bought two new 16GB ATA disks and am not able to boot
> anymore since wd0 has been retired:
>
> Fresh current from today:
>
> [...]
> ad0: ad_timeout: lost disk contact
> ata0: resetting devices
>
> and after it hangs forever.
>
> I tried IDE_DELAY=1 and
hi,
I've bought two new 16GB ATA disks and am not able to boot
anymore since wd0 has been retired:
Fresh current from today:
[...]
ad0: ad_timeout: lost disk contact
ata0: resetting devices
and after it hangs forever.
I tried IDE_DELAY=1 and 15000 but it did not change anything.
Break i
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 02:28:29PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Because the wd driver has a 10 secs timeout, and ata has 5 secs.
> I think the easiest way to "solve" this is to increase the
> timeout to 10-15 secs, as little as I want to do that...
I don't really understand disk drivers, so if
It seems Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Yup, sounds like the problem some are seing, now I wonder why I
> > havn't seen it on any of the IBM disks I've access to, hmm...
> >
> > It apparantly can't be disabled, but I'll try to figure out if
> > I can detect when the drive is in this mode, or p
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 08:22:03AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Yup, sounds like the problem some are seing, now I wonder why I
> havn't seen it on any of the IBM disks I've access to, hmm...
>
> It apparantly can't be disabled, but I'll try to figure out if
> I can detect when the drive is in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Soren Schmidt writes:
>It seems Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
>
>Yup, sounds like the problem some are seing, now I wonder why I
>havn't seen it on any of the IBM disks I've access to, hmm...
>
>It apparantly can't be disabled, but I'll try to figure out if
>I can dete
It seems Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
Yup, sounds like the problem some are seing, now I wonder why I
havn't seen it on any of the IBM disks I've access to, hmm...
It apparantly can't be disabled, but I'll try to figure out if
I can detect when the drive is in this mode, or put it in
standby mode
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 04:50:55PM -0600, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
> Check http://www.storage.ibm.com/techsup/hddtech/prodspec/djna_spw.pdf
> If a command is received during spin down of ADM, the drive quits the spin down
> and tries to complete the command as soon as possible.
> In case the sp
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 09:25:11AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> There is this thing with the IBM's doing some headcleaning stuff once
> a day/week, but I've never seen any of my IBM's do that (I got plenty
> of them). I'll try to get more info on that from IBM...
Check http://www.storage.ibm.co
It seems Dave J. Boers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 03:02:24PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > Uhm, that wont be new WD drives, as they are exactly the same as
> > IBM drives give or take the label :)
>
> Huh? That I didn't know. So you're saying that WD and IBM 18 Gb disks are
> the same har
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 03:02:24PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Uhm, that wont be new WD drives, as they are exactly the same as
> IBM drives give or take the label :)
Huh? That I didn't know. So you're saying that WD and IBM 18 Gb disks are
the same hardware?
My disk:
ad0: ATA-4 disk at at
It seems Dave J. Boers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 07:10:46AM -0600, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Dec 15 19:01:02 test /kernel: ata0-master: ad_timeout: lost disk contact -
>resetting
> > Dec 15 19:01:02 test /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done
>
> > Dec 16 07:01:24 test /kernel:
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 07:10:46AM -0600, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
> Dec 15 19:01:02 test /kernel: ata0-master: ad_timeout: lost disk contact - resetting
> Dec 15 19:01:02 test /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done
> Dec 16 07:01:24 test /kernel: ata0-master: ad_timeout: lost disk contact
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 09:25:11AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Dave J. Boers wrote:
> >
> > I am still having "disc contact lost messages" regularly too. I've been
> > posting about them on several occasions some time ago. I haven't been able
> > to pinn it down, however. IF they occu
Hi Soren,
No unfortunately it still fails with the patch and the UDMA disabled in
the BIOS.
I'd be happy to try anything else you can think of. :)
Thanks.
--
Regards, Devin.
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> It seems Devin Butterfield wrote:
> > Hi Soren/group,
> >
> > After spending a little time sni
It seems Devin Butterfield wrote:
> Hi Soren/group,
>
> After spending a little time sniffing around in my BIOS I realized that
> my BIOS (Award BIOS) defaults to disabling UDMA for both master and
> slave and for some reason I never thought to check thisduh. Anyway
> after setting this to "a
hi, there!
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Dave J. Boers wrote:
> I am still having "disc contact lost messages" regularly too.
[...]
> There are two important aspects of the problem:
>
> 1. The problem does not always occur: it's unpredictable
> 2. When it occurs, I can actually hear the disk spinnin
hi, there!
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Dave J. Boers wrote:
> Could you tell met the exact time on which these messages occurred?
> Anywhere near 10:15 or 9:15 ?
nope. the time is unpredictable.
sometimes it can work more than a day without spilling out those messages
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send m
Hi Soren/group,
After spending a little time sniffing around in my BIOS I realized that
my BIOS (Award BIOS) defaults to disabling UDMA for both master and
slave and for some reason I never thought to check thisduh. Anyway
after setting this to "auto" for both master and slave the problem see
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 03:29:30PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
> same here, dmesg output:
>
> ata_command: timeout waiting for interrupt
> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a
> ata0-master: ad_timeout: lost disk contact - resetting
> ata0: resetting devices .. done
> ata0-master: ad_timeo
It seems Devin Butterfield wrote:
> That's interesting...In my case it is quite easily reproduced (very
> predictable). All I have to do is reboot and then run sysinstall and
> when it probes the devices the disks time out. So far I have not been
> able to get this behavior at any other time.
>
>
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 09:36:42AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> One more thing, do you have SMART enabled in your BIOS ??, if so
> turn it off, and see if that changes anything...
I don't recall having it enabled; but I will check to make sure as soon as
I get home from work (which is still some
Hi,
"Dave J. Boers" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 08:29:14AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems Devin Butterfield wrote:
> > > I just recently compiled a kernel with the new ATA driver and have
> > > discovered a problem: if I run sysinstall, right when it says "probing
> > > devices,
It seems Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Dave J. Boers wrote:
> >
> > I am still having "disc contact lost messages" regularly too. I've been
> > posting about them on several occasions some time ago. I haven't been able
> > to pinn it down, however. IF they occur, they occur somewhere between 9
It seems Dave J. Boers wrote:
>
> I am still having "disc contact lost messages" regularly too. I've been
> posting about them on several occasions some time ago. I haven't been able
> to pinn it down, however. IF they occur, they occur somewhere between 9:15
> and 9:20 a.m. OR p.m. But they don
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 08:29:14AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Devin Butterfield wrote:
> > I just recently compiled a kernel with the new ATA driver and have
> > discovered a problem: if I run sysinstall, right when it says "probing
> > devices, please wait (this can be a while)" error
It seems Devin Butterfield wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just recently compiled a kernel with the new ATA driver and have
> discovered a problem: if I run sysinstall, right when it says "probing
> devices, please wait (this can be a while)" error messages saying...
[snip]
> and after printing these messages
Hi,
I just recently compiled a kernel with the new ATA driver and have
discovered a problem: if I run sysinstall, right when it says "probing
devices, please wait (this can be a while)" error messages saying...
Dec 15 21:20:05 dbm /kernel: ata0-slave: ad_timeout: lost disk contact -
resetting
De
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>It seems Jeremy L. Stock wrote:
>>>Are you sure you have the latest versions of everything in /sys/dev/ata ??
>>>There was a window of opportunity where I messed up unless ATA_STATIC_ID
>>>was defined...
>>>
>>>-Søren
>>>
>>
>>Fairly positive I have the
It seems Jeremy L. Stock wrote:
>>Are you sure you have the latest versions of everything in /sys/dev/ata ??
>>There was a window of opportunity where I messed up unless ATA_STATIC_ID
>>was defined...
>>
>>-Søren
>>
>
>Fairly positive I have the latest versions. I cvsup'ed twice yesterday. I
>forg
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>It seems Jeremy L. Stock wrote:
>> I have two hard drives both Western Digital 8.4GB (primary master) 6.4GB
>> (primary slave) and a CDROM as secondary master. The driver detects the
>> 8.4GB and my cdrom but doesn't seem to see the second hd at all. I'd
It seems Jeremy L. Stock wrote:
> I have two hard drives both Western Digital 8.4GB (primary master) 6.4GB
> (primary slave) and a CDROM as secondary master. The driver detects the
> 8.4GB and my cdrom but doesn't seem to see the second hd at all. I'd provide
> more info if I could but / lives on
I have two hard drives both Western Digital 8.4GB (primary master) 6.4GB
(primary slave) and a CDROM as secondary master. The driver detects the
8.4GB and my cdrom but doesn't seem to see the second hd at all. I'd provide
more info if I could but / lives on the second drive so I'm not sure if
I ca
i've been using the ATA driver for a while now, but since my last word & kernel
i get "WARNING: / was not properly dismounted" at the end of the dmesg and i
have to fsck /.
my last world was about 2 dayz ago.
dmesg output for that ATA driver :
ad1: ATA-4 disk at ata0 as slave
ad1: 6149MB (12
43 matches
Mail list logo
