Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-05-09 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Salvo Bartolotta wrote: [ resending, with a subject ] OK, I;ve looked and looked and can't seem to figure out how to set hw.ata.wc to enabled. I've put and a few other things in /etc/sysctl.conf, the others get set, hw.ata.wc doesn't. You can't change it by hand either as sysctl tells

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-05-01 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:50:08AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: For the people wanting to turn on write caching ... it WILL break the write ordering needed by softupdates and journaling filesystems, so don't do it unless you know what you're doing. I guess it would be better to do this kind

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-30 Thread Cejka Rudolf
Bruce Evans wrote (2001/04/28): This is probably caused by write caching now being off by default in the ata driver, possibly amplified by not using soft updates. Without the new dir allocation, -current would be even slower :(. Yes, thanks. I really forgot on this change. My rough results

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Salvo Bartolotta
[ resending, with a subject ] OK, I;ve looked and looked and can't seem to figure out how to set hw.ata.wc to enabled. I've put and a few other things in /etc/sysctl.conf, the others get set, hw.ata.wc doesn't. You can't change it by hand either as sysctl tells you it's readonly. Grepping in

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Peter Wemm
Erick Kinnee wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:24:40AM -0500, Erick Kinnee wrote: No flames please, I feel I have tried to find the answer. :) Ok, I do deserve a flame it seems. I totally missed man ata. The loader.conf manpage does state that there are 4 sysctl knobs tuneable from there.

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Cejka Rudolf wrote: Right now, I have upgraded my -current machine from February 13 to April 26. I were pleased with change to dir allocation in FFS, but here are my unpleasant test results (UDMA33, partition is 3 GB

Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-27 Thread Cejka Rudolf
Right now, I have upgraded my -current machine from February 13 to April 26. I were pleased with change to dir allocation in FFS, but here are my unpleasant test results (UDMA33, partition is 3 GB where 1 GB is free, soft-updates are enabled): Old system New

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-27 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Cejka Rudolf wrote: Right now, I have upgraded my -current machine from February 13 to April 26. I were pleased with change to dir allocation in FFS, but here are my unpleasant test results (UDMA33, partition is 3 GB where 1 GB is free, soft-updates are enabled):