Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Warner Losh
Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major library versions. http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/Pmaj it bumps all the major numbrs of all the impacted libraries that I could find on my system. Please review this patch as I'd like to commit it soon. Also, I'm not

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Warner Losh wrote: Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major library versions. http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/Pmaj it bumps all the major numbrs of all the impacted libraries that I could find on my system. Please enclose small ( 100K)

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Evans writes: : Please enclose small ( 100K) patches in the mail if you want them : reviewed. They would have to be quoted to be reviewed... OK. See attached. It seems to work for me. : I think the impacted libraries can be found by compiling them with and

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Warner Losh
In message 01021422425001.00537@zoomer "Danny J. Zerkel" writes: : Is this going to cause any trouble down the road when the vendor bumps : this? Do we need numeric compatibility? I'm just wondering, since the : vendor's Makefile specifically says: : : VERSION = 2.10.0 : INTERFACE = 3

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Warner Losh
[[ see end of message for major downer ]] In message 01021423431802.00537@zoomer "Danny J. Zerkel" writes: : These lines come from Makefile.in in the vendor's source. So are you saying it should be 3.1 instead so that the vendor can come out with 4 later? It must be different than 3. : But,

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Mark Murray
Please review this patch as I'd like to commit it soon. Also, I'm not 100% sure what to do about libdes.so.3, so if you have commments on that please let me know. Other than that, the patches should be close to commitable. Now is the time to toss that into compat/ M -- Mark Murray

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major library versions. I haven't tried to build -current for a few days now. Can you summerize what breakage you are seeing? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes: : On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: : Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major : library versions. : : I haven't tried to build -current for a few days now. Can you summerize : what

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:32:33AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes: : On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 03:45:57PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: : Here's a patch that I think will fix the major breakage with major : library versions. : : I haven't tried to

Re: Major bumping of libFOO

2001-02-14 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes: : I'm not happy about bumping every shared lib. Can you answer: Nor am I. : (1) does a ``make world'' will not work? Peter showed that we had no : choice with libc due to the use of the host's existing install programs. make world works.