On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:13:35PM -0800, Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
There are days when people get tired with the lagacy code in the system - when
things of the past just have to go. Recently I got sick and tired with one of
those things. The command is, as you could have guessed
There are days when people get tired with the lagacy code in the system - when
things of the past just have to go. Recently I got sick and tired with one of
those things. The command is, as you could have guessed from the subject,
xags(1) aka /usr/bin/xargs. It is buggy and cluttered piece of
* Jackie 'business-first' Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011210 16:19] wrote:
As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I propose
implementing arbitrary length argument list passing right in the operating
system.
Nice proposal, where's the diff?
Yours sincerly, Jackie
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jackie 'business-first' Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011210 16:19] wrote:
As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I propose
implementing arbitrary length argument list passing right in the operating
system.
Nice proposal,
ummm, what are my scripts that use it going to use instead?
it seems to work fine, and it's pretty much an expected
base utility. Removing it is going to cause quite a bit of confusion.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
There are days when people get tired with the
* Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ummm, what are my scripts that use it going to use instead?
it seems to work fine, and it's pretty much an expected
base utility. Removing it is going to cause quite a bit of confusion.
I have to concurr here. Who knows what's going to break when
If this isn't a troll, I don't know what is
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
There are days when people get tired with the lagacy code in the
system - when things of the past just have to go. Recently I got sick
and tired with one of those things. The command is,
On 10-Dec-01 Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
There are days when people get tired with the lagacy code in the system -
when
things of the past just have to go. Recently I got sick and tired with one of
those things. The command is, as you could have guessed from the subject,
xags(1) aka
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Emiel Kollof wrote:
* Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ummm, what are my scripts that use it going to use instead?
it seems to work fine, and it's pretty much an expected
base utility. Removing it is going to cause quite a bit of
Brandon D. Valentine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jackie 'business-first' Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011210 16:19] wrote:
As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I propose
implementing arbitrary length argument list passing
Either this is a troll, or it's an attempt at the very first layer 8 (between
chair and keyboard) exploit:
Version #2 - for enterprise (ie. business) users, who are searching for their
way in life (overwhelming majority) (local solution, still):
find / -print0 | grep -v
* Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My, is it April 1st already? How quickly time flies! December feels
like it was just yesterday!
You can say that again... I missed my birthday and the new-years party
too. I'm such a geek...
:-)
Cheers,
Emiel
--
No man is an island, but some of
My, is it April 1st already? How quickly time flies! December feels
like it was just yesterday!
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On 10-Dec-01 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
Brandon D. Valentine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jackie 'business-first' Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011210 16:19]
wrote:
As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I propose
implementing
* Brian F. Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011210 17:11] wrote:
Brandon D. Valentine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jackie 'business-first' Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011210 16:19] wrote:
As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1),
Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
[ ... plot to murder innocent xargs command ... ]
Please don't. I use this on a daily basis. It is a much faster
way to use find than exec, since it doesn't require a billion
instances of grep.
As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1),
16 matches
Mail list logo
