Bosko Milekic wrote:
I plan to commit the new bits within the next week.
However, as is usually the case with commits of this magnitude,
I'd like a few more tests to be run by a few more people.
I've been testing the allocator myself (in several different
ways, mainly resource
Hi Terry,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:03:13AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
A general comment, and then a comment on the patch:
I would like to see this code be optional, until such time
as benchmarks have proven it to be better than the existing
code, or have proben it to be worse.
FWIW- your patches appear to work fine for top of tree alpha.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
The reason I said in the next week is actually because on Sat. June 23rd
(not this upcoming one, but the one after), I should be flying off to
Yugoslavia (actually to London, and only then to Yugoslavia). I will be
gone for 3 weeks and seeing as how maintaining this huge diff is a real
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:48:14AM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The reason I said in the next week is actually because on Sat. June 23rd
(not this upcoming one, but the one after), I should be flying off to
Yugoslavia (actually to London, and only then to Yugoslavia). I will be
gone for 3
Folks,
I have a new version of the patch for you to test. It's up:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_slab/mb_alloc-LATEST.diff
(same place as before).
The difference is that I have removed the HUGE src/sys sweep for #include's
and have removed the need to include
Hi -current -alpha,
If you run -CURRENT on multiprocessor alpha, please
please please read this! :-)
The final version (or next to final, depending on how
this final testing stage goes) of the new mbuf allocator which
I have been working on for the past 1.5 months and which
Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week
tho?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:13:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week
tho?
Your prompt reply is extremely encouraging. Thanks! :-
The reason I said in the next week is actually because on Sat. June 23rd
(not this
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:13:12PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Right, will do some testing, thanks.. can you give us a bit more than a week
tho?
Your prompt reply is extremely encouraging. Thanks! :-
The reason I said in the next
10 matches
Mail list logo
