From: Michael Harnois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:31 AM
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:02:59 -0800, Mike Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'll keep working on this one; things will go a lot faster if I
can get my hands on a system that misbehaves in a
From: Michael Harnois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:31 AM
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:02:59 -0800, Mike Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'll keep working on this one; things will go a lot faster if I
can get my hands on a system that
I cvsuped current ~2000/12/11 @ ~ 22:00, the previous version was
from around 2000/12/07. Before the update my Dual intel nic was
happy post update the nic isn't even probed.
attached is a pciconf -v -l from before and after as well as a
a boot -v from after. If you need more info
I cvsuped current ~2000/12/11 @ ~ 22:00, the previous version was
from around 2000/12/07. Before the update my Dual intel nic was
happy post update the nic isn't even probed.
Hrm. That's odd; I have one of those here (with a Compaq label on it) as
part of my test set. In fact, I
I cvsuped current ~2000/12/11 @ ~ 22:00, the previous version was
from around 2000/12/07. Before the update my Dual intel nic was
happy post update the nic isn't even probed.
attached is a pciconf -v -l from before and after as well as a
a boot -v from after. If you need more
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:02:59 -0800, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'll keep working on this one; things will go a lot faster if I
can get my hands on a system that misbehaves in a corresponding
fashion.
You're welcome to come to Iowa and use mine. I'll even put you up.
--
