On 13/11/2010, crocket wrote:
> Does Delete key match \E[3~ on FreeBSD-CURRENT xterm mode?
> It's nice to see backspace key match ^?(ASCII DEL), too, since ^H(Ctrl-H) is
> reserved by such applications as vim and emacs.
>
For witch action C-H is reserved in vim(1) ? vim, emacs, zsh, and many
othe
Does Delete key match \E[3~ on FreeBSD-CURRENT xterm mode?
It's nice to see backspace key match ^?(ASCII DEL), too, since ^H(Ctrl-H) is
reserved by such applications as vim and emacs.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
--- On Sat, 11/13/10, Eir Nym wrote:
> From: Eir Nym
> Subject: Re: Keymaps in X11 and consoles should be the same with TEKEN_XTERM
> in the kernel.
> To: "crocket"
> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010, 4:54 PM
> On 13 November
* crocket , 20101113 13:52:
> TEKEN_XTERM turns on xterm mode.
> I compiled a kernel with TEKEN_XTERM, and changed cons25 to xterm in
> /etc/ttys.
>
> When I executed vim on a console, the keyboard acted weirdly.
Keep in mind that this list is supposed to discuss FreeBSD -CURRENT; not
FreeBSD 8.x
On 13 November 2010 15:52, crocket wrote:
> TEKEN_XTERM turns on xterm mode.
> I compiled a kernel with TEKEN_XTERM, and changed cons25 to xterm in
> /etc/ttys.
>
> When I executed vim on a console, the keyboard acted weirdly.
> After setting TERM back to cons25 again, vim acted normally again on
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
>
> * Summary of magic key sequences
>
> 101 keyboard84 keyboard function
>
> Ctrl-Alt-Delete Ctrl-Alt-Delete reboot
> Ctrl-Alt-E
>I recently looked at keymaps in /usr/share/syscons/keymaps and found
>many minor errors. In addition to that, there is so much
>inconsistency among existing keymaps. True that national keyboards have
>different layout of regular keys (alphanumeric keys and symbol keys).
>But, it is absurd that
On Jan 21, 9:40pm, Warner Losh wrote:
} Subject: Re: keymaps
} In message <199901220043.laa22...@lightning.itga.com.au> Gregory Bond writes:
} : my vote: A version of the standard keymap with CapsLock and LeftCtl
} : functions swapped so the control key is under my left finger like
}
> What's wrong with us.unix.kbd?
This also swaps a bunch of other things - Grave<->Esc, BS<->Del, etc. It was
more confusing, so I made a new keymap.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> -Original Message-
> From: John Fieber [mailto:jfie...@indiana.edu]
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 1999 3:51 PM
> To: Kazutaka YOKOTA
> Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: keymaps
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
>
> > Gentleme
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> Gentlemen, I don't intend to add yet another keymap to
> /usr/share/syscons/keymaps. I am merely trying to define a reasonable
> set of common, consistent key binding for existing keymaps.
>
> National keyboards have different layout of regular keys.
>> my vote: A version of the standard keymap with CapsLock and LeftCtl functio
>ns
>> swapped so the control key is under my left finger like God intended!
>
>My vote is both of the above. I've never found a use for CapsLock, but
>LeftCtl is important enough that I wouldn't mind it duplicated.
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 11:43:56AM +1100, Gregory Bond wrote:
> my vote: A version of the standard keymap with CapsLock and LeftCtl
> functions swapped so the control key is under my left finger like God
> intended!
Take your existing keymap and swap 029 and 058 with these:
029 clock clock
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> ScrollLock does "back scroll" too. You want both?
My Libretto 70CT has no Scroll Lock, only a Pause.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Gregory Bond wrote:
> my vote: A version of the standard keymap with CapsLock and LeftCtl
> functions
> swapped so the control key is under my left finger like God intended!
My vote is both of the above. I've never found a use for CapsLock, but
LeftCtl is important enough
In message <199901220043.laa22...@lightning.itga.com.au> Gregory Bond writes:
: my vote: A version of the standard keymap with CapsLock and LeftCtl
: functions swapped so the control key is under my left finger like
: God intended!
What's wrong with us.unix.kbd?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail
my vote: A version of the standard keymap with CapsLock and LeftCtl functions
swapped so the control key is under my left finger like God intended!
Greg,
home of us.iso-lock-ctl.kbd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>> 104 Pause Start screen saver (saver).
>:
>> The above assignments for the keycodes 1, 57, 70, 84 and 92 are
>> compatible with many, if not all, existing keymaps.
>
>So far so good!
>
>> The assignments for 104 and 108 are new.
>
>104 (Pause?) does the "Backscroll" on
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
:
> 104 Pause Start screen saver (saver).
:
> The above assignments for the keycodes 1, 57, 70, 84 and 92 are
> compatible with many, if not all, existing keymaps.
So far so good!
> The assignments for 104 and 108 are new.
104 (Pause?) does the
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
>
> * 101/102/104 Enhanced Keyboard support
>
> Key CodeKey Stroke Function
> -
> 1 Ctrl-Alt-EscEnter DDB (debug).
> 57 Ctrl-Alt-Space
20 matches
Mail list logo
