On Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:24:16 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> Kostik wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it
> > > > up.
> > > >
> > > > 1
Kostik wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >
> > > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it
> > > up.
> > >
> > > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
> > >problems
On 10/25/14, 5:49 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Friday, October 24, 2014 04:43:28 PM Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up.
1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
problems with the n
Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Friday, October 24, 2014 04:43:28 PM Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it
> > > up.
> > >
> > > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
> > >
> > >prob
On Friday, October 24, 2014 04:43:28 PM Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up.
> >
> > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
> >
> >problems with the new one? (I am not aware
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:42:20PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 24 October 2014 12:17, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > I remember the main reason for keeping oldnfs, both server and client,
> > around in HEAD was to facilitate MFC of fixes to the branches which
> > still use oldnfs, i.e. stable/
On 24 October 2014 12:17, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> I remember the main reason for keeping oldnfs, both server and client,
> around in HEAD was to facilitate MFC of fixes to the branches which
> still use oldnfs, i.e. stable/8. If this reason is still valid, oldnfs
> have to stay in HEAD til
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up.
> >
> > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
> >problems with the new one? (I am not aware
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up.
1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding
issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.)
2 -
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:57:26 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should
> > bring it up.
> >
> > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
> > problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding
>
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:57:26 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should
> bring it up.
>
> 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
> problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding
> issues in the new nfs that
Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should
bring it up.
1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding
issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.)
2 - Does anyone see a problem with getting ri
12 matches
Mail list logo
