Bezüglich Kevin Oberman's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 01:11 (localtime):
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
Bezüglich Attilio Rao's Nachricht vom 14.10.2012 02:27 (localtime):
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
Bezüglich Kevin Oberman's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 01:11 (localtime):
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
Bezüglich Attilio Rao's Nachricht vom
Bezüglich Attilio Rao's Nachricht vom 14.10.2012 02:27 (localtime):
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
Bezüglich Attilio Rao's Nachricht vom 14.10.2012 02:27 (localtime):
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
On Wed,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
On Wed,
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
...
After many people willing to test fuse on STABLE_9, I made
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 25.09.2012 20:24 (localtime):
schrieb Attilio Rao am 21.09.2012 02:22 (localtime):
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13,
schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
...
After many people willing to test fuse on STABLE_9, I made this patch
that at least compiles there:
schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 25.09.2012 20:24 (localtime):
schrieb Attilio Rao am 21.09.2012 02:22 (localtime):
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao
schrieb Attilio Rao am 21.09.2012 02:22 (localtime):
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
As
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
[ trimm ]
You can use the branch directly or this patch against -CURRENT at 240752:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_240752.patch
In order to test this work, then, you just need to patch (or use
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
As already published several times, according to the following
On 20.09.12 00:26, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/18/2012 9:48 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
In addition to fusefs-kmod, Bryan and Florian have also updated
fusefs-lib and fusefs-ntfs ports. For instance, please refer to this
e-mail:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9/19/12, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at
On 9/18/2012 9:48 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
In addition to fusefs-kmod, Bryan and Florian have also updated
fusefs-lib and fusefs-ntfs ports. For instance, please refer to this
e-mail:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-August/077950.html
Even if this work is someway
On 19/09/2012 04:48, Attilio Rao wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
Alternatively, a kernel patch that should work with HEAD@240684 is here:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_240684.patch
I guess the patch can easilly apply to all
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
I still haven't
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
As already published several times, according to the following
Hi;
Just thought I'd share a link for the fuse-xfs project (for MacFUSE);
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fusexfs/
It's read-only so maybe it can be considered a feature compatible
replacement of our kernel driver ;).
cheers,
Pedro.
ps. I added it to the WantedPorts wiki so it won't be
On 7/21/12, Antony Mawer li...@mawer.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/18, Gustau Pérez i Querol gpe...@entel.upc.edu:
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7/21/12, Antony Mawer li...@mawer.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/18, Gustau Pérez i Querol gpe...@entel.upc.edu:
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/7/18, Gustau Pérez i Querol gpe...@entel.upc.edu:
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not particulary
On 07/17/2012 22:54, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
In fact filesystems not particulary specific and not tied our kernel
would go to userspace; thinks like smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for
example should be in userspace
Doug Barton responded:
A big -1 here.
The more native FS support we
Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/17/2012 22:54, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
In fact filesystems not particulary specific and not tied our kernel
would go to userspace; thinks like smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for
example should be in userspace
A big -1 here.
The more native FS support we
On 19/07/2012 13:36, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
PS Re ext2:
I'm looking for an equivalent of mkfs_ext2, any suggestions ? Ports maybe ?
sounds like you want sysutils/e2fsprogs
ext2/3/4 mkfs/fsck etc. I believe.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not particulary
specific and not tied our kernel would go to userspace; thinks like
smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for example should be in
2012/7/18, Gustau Pérez i Querol gpe...@entel.upc.edu:
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not particulary
specific and not tied our kernel would go to userspace; thinks like
smbfs,
On 07/17/2012 22:54, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
In fact filesystems not particulary specific and not tied our kernel
would go to userspace; thinks like smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for
example should be in userspace
A big -1 here.
The more native FS support we have the better off we are
On 07/17/2012 22:54, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
In fact filesystems not particulary specific and not tied our kernel
would go to userspace; thinks like smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for
example should be in userspace
The list is incomplete and maybe wrong; maybe some should stay in
the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Gustau Pérez i Querol
gpe...@entel.upc.edu wrote:
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not particulary specific
and not tied our kernel would go to
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
I still haven't heard from Vivien or Edward, anyway as NTFS is
basically only used RO these
2012/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
I still haven't heard from Vivien or Edward, anyway as NTFS is
basically only used RO these days (also the mount_ntfs code just
permits
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
need? I'm one of the maintainer of XFS on Linux, and while I know
2012/7/2, Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
need? I'm one of
On 7/2/12 1:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
need? I'm one of the
2012/7/2, Russell Cattelan catte...@thebarn.com:
On 7/2/12 1:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:03:40AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
On 7/2/12 10:03 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:12:06 +0300
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:03:40AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
in 2 months the code dealing with non-MPSAFE filesystem will be
removed and filesystems not yet MPSAFE
2012/7/1 C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
in 2 months the code dealing with non-MPSAFE filesystem will be
You can not only run Linux on XFS (which I do) but it is still likely
the most reliable and consistently performant of the filesystems
available in Linux because of its origin and its maturity. XFS did
not originate in Linux (it originated in SGI's Irix) so it should not
surprise that Linux
On 06/29/12 16:32, Attilio Rao wrote:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
in 2 months the code dealing with non-MPSAFE filesystem will be
removed and filesystems not yet MPSAFE will be disconnected from the
tree.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Michael Butler
i...@protected-networks.net wrote:
On 06/29/12 16:32, Attilio Rao wrote:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
in 2 months the code dealing with non-MPSAFE filesystem
On 06/29/12 16:32, Attilio Rao wrote:
As already published several times, according to the following plan:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
in 2 months the code dealing with non-MPSAFE filesystem will be
removed and filesystems not yet MPSAFE will be disconnected from the
tree.
51 matches
Mail list logo
