: #define VM_METER VM_TOTAL
This change was part of a larger patch set. I have no particular
objection to adding the #define or renaming VM_TOTAL back to VM_METER,
but I *WILL* point out that even without a name change the VM cnt
structure has changed so often that for all
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words in effect of:
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
gratuitous and it breaks standard compatability rules:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
in effect of:
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
gratuitous and it breaks standard
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
in effect of:
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
Of course, these things can be
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 04:02:00PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
Ok, I agree that the naming could cause confusion since there is a
vmmeter struct and a vmtotal struct. However, the Release Engineering
policy that was set out at the start of RELENG_5_0 is that public API
changes need
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:23:30AM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks a few
ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
I committed a work around --
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
in effect of:
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
Of course, these things
[ Very large SNIP ]
Scott Long wrote:
I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like to see
5.0-5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read
my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened.
Fair enough.
Also, it's common practice to
Mark Murray wrote:
[ Very large SNIP ]
Scott Long wrote:
I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like
to see
5.0-5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read
my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened.
Fair enough.
Also, it's
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
a line like
#warning VM_METER is deprecated and will be removed on kluctember 43, 2861
would be nice to, of course. =-)
I wanted this, but I don't know who to implement it so that it only
prints out IIF VM_METER is used somewhere
* De: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-01-18 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: VM_METER no longer defined? ]
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
a line like
#warning VM_METER is deprecated and will be removed on kluctember 43, 2861
would be nice
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Mark Murray wrote:
[ Very large SNIP ]
Scott Long wrote:
I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like to see
5.0-5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read
my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened.
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks a few
ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
--
Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks
a few
ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
I've got to admit that this one slipped in under my radar. Would the
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:42:27AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
I've got to admit that this one slipped in under my radar. Would the
committer and submitter please give an explanation of why VM_METER
was changed?
The commit which removed VM_METER is here:
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 12:42, Scott Long wrote:
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks
a few
ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
I've got to admit
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:02:07PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
It looks like Matt did this to fix vm.vmtotal. From sys/vm/vm_param.h:
Make 'sysctl vm.vmtotal' work properly using updated patch from Hiten.
(the patch in the PR was stale).
It looks to have been replaced by VM_TOTAL. I
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
gratuitous and it breaks standard compatability rules: deprecate
for one major version and remove in the second. I haven't seen
any reason why this couldn't be added
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
gratuitous and it breaks standard compatability rules: deprecate
for one major version and remove in the second. I haven't seen
any reason why
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Scott Long wrote:
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Index: vm_param.h
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/vm/vm_param.h,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 vm_param.h
--- vm_param.h 2003/01/11 07:29:46
20 matches
Mail list logo
