On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
That revision doesn't change the structure, just how it is defined, so
binary compatibility is not an issue. As for source compatibility,
just use the DBREG_DRX macro, which exists in both -STABLE and
-CURRENT (it was merged
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
As for source compatibility, just use the DBREG_DRX macro, which exists
in both -STABLE and -CURRENT (it was merged into -STABLE two years ago).
It's too bad source compatibility hasn't been preserved.
Indeed.
Argument d is not properly
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:08:32PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Unfortunately (in the sense that both of you duplicated effort),
Alfred independently came up with a similiar patch which went in as
$PORTSDIR/emulators/wine/files/patch-context_i386
and which I already fed upstream to the Wine
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:04:01PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
Fine, but if included as is in Wine because, it will break
compatibility with Net/OpenBSD because DBREG_DRX is a FreeBSDism...
Sorry for the phrasing, remove the spurious because to make sense
of it :)
--
Pierre Beyssac
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
Fine, but if included as is in Wine because, it will break
compatibility with Net/OpenBSD because DBREG_DRX is a FreeBSDism...
that's why I surrounded my patch with a #ifdef DBREG_DRX (which
seems cleaner than a #ifdef __FreeBSD__).
Sheesh.
PHK, now
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], G
erald Pfeifer writes:
Sheesh.
PHK, now we have the situation where user programs require #ifdefs
to be portable among the BSDs when this was not required before.
Please consider reverting
That has been considered, and I don't think it is a sensible solution,
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021108 05:29] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], G
erald Pfeifer writes:
Sheesh.
PHK, now we have the situation where user programs require #ifdefs
to be portable among the BSDs when this was not required before.
Please consider reverting
Hi,
Yesterday I tried to upgrade wine on my FreeBSD-current box. It didn't
compile until I changed following in server/context_i386.c (looks like
this is because of commit of 1.28 version of src/sys/i386/include/reg.h)
--8---cut here---start-8---
---
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Krzysztof [iso-8859-2] Jêdruczyk wrote:
Yesterday I tried to upgrade wine on my FreeBSD-current box. It didn't
compile until I changed following in server/context_i386.c (looks like
this is because of commit of 1.28 version of src/sys/i386/include/reg.h)
Thanks for the
Gerald Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Poul-Henning, your patch to src/sys/i386/include/reg.h
revision 1.28
date: 2002/10/20 20:48:56; author: phk; state: Exp; lines: +6 -9
Change the definition of the debugging registers to be an array, so
that we can index into it, rather than
10 matches
Mail list logo
