Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Silbersack writes:
Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being
non-existant be improved?
Barely, because without
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Silbersack
writes:
Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being
non-existant be improved?
Barely, because without /dev, how do you plan to open the console ?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Silbersack w
rites:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the
question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being
non-existant be improved?
Barely, because without
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
An error message would be sufficient; my concern was that someone
might run into this and spend hours trying to figure out which of X
variables was the problem.
Right, but the only way to get an error message is to let /sbin/init
die and have
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:32:07 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Right, but the only way to get an error message is to let /sbin/init
die and have the kernel print the message. /sbin/init cannot
print the message when there is no /dev/console can it ?
Yes, it can, if the kernel
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Wollman w
rites:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:32:07 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Right, but the only way to get an error message is to let /sbin/init
die and have the kernel print the message. /sbin/init cannot
print the message when there
