Mark Hittinger wrote:
Hey per request I'm reporting some ep0 breakage in today's -current. I have
an etherlink III 3c509B and the probing appears correct.
Sequence of events boot -s
# ifconfig ep0 inet 192.168.18.200
(PC hangs)
More later...
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 10:40:22AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
No, it's better to remove "device ep0 at isa ? port foo irq blah ..." etc
and just have "device ep0" *only*. If the pnp code finds it, let it use
pnp to configure it.
Does it do that by now? About two or three months ago it didn't
I think David was joking with you, hence the \begin{wpaul} statement. Bill
Paul is of course our resident Ethernet driver guy, and he is not known
for his patience with people who do not supply enough information. :)
Only 1/2 joking. This seems to be my month for content free bug reports.
I
Actually I don't really care what you do with this. I did say "more later"
but you chopped that part out. I was only trying to give a heads up.
Then way waste people's time with content-free messages? Just to lower
the signal-to-noise ratio? We all could have waited for this email.
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 12:28:27PM -0500, Mark Hittinger wrote:
Hey per request I'm reporting some ep0 breakage in today's -current. I have
an etherlink III 3c509B and the probing appears correct.
Sequence of events boot -s
# ifconfig ep0 inet 192.168.18.200
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 11:58:28AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Sequence of events boot -s
# ifconfig ep0 inet 192.168.18.200
(PC hangs)
\begin{wpaul}
Dunno, you seem too mellow.
WHAT am I supose to do with this? I don't even understand what
I'm not certain what the problem is, but the ep0 changes that generated
the HEADS UP messages affect _only_ PC Cards. The other sections of code
are untouched. Further, I'm 99% sure the only card that could possibly
have been broken by the probe change is the 3C574 PC Card (not 3C574B).
Jason
WHAT am I supose to do with this? I don't even understand what you
are trying to tell me. You booted single user and got a hang. What
is the #'ed line supose to be? Last time *_I_* booted single user I
didn't see such output.
Actually I don't really care what you do with
