this strikes me as avoidable. I'll think about it.. Until then
I guess I'll just have two lists in the thread.. one for sleep and one for
mutexes.
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
On 23-Jul-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
Why does the mutex not link blocked processes though the
sleep
Jake Burkholder wrote:
Why does the mutex not link blocked processes though the
sleep queue linked list entry? Why does it use the run queue entry?
Because in some cases its necessary for a process to acquire
mutexes while its on the sleep queue. If they used the same
linkage the
Why does the mutex not link blocked processes though the
sleep queue linked list entry? Why does it use the run queue entry?
In KSEs the sleep queue and run queue enties go into different
sub structures and ahve different types so this breaks...
do I need to do something sleazy or can I just
On 23-Jul-01 Julian Elischer wrote:
Why does the mutex not link blocked processes though the
sleep queue linked list entry? Why does it use the run queue entry?
In KSEs the sleep queue and run queue enties go into different
sub structures and ahve different types so this breaks...
do I