> : Yeah, this doesn't comple for some reason as of about 1.0r4. The port just
> : doesn't bother trying to install it - no-one's cared enough to look at why
> : it's broken and how to fix it.
>
> It is broken because it assume too many implementation details about
> symbols being defined. A more
On Tue, 16-Feb-1999 at 22:05:05 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message
>
> Kris Kennaway writes:
> : runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for
> : (FTP clients, simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having problems
> : with?
>
> I have verified that runsocks works with both
In message
Kris
Kennaway writes:
: Yeah, this doesn't comple for some reason as of about 1.0r4. The port just
: doesn't bother trying to install it - no-one's cared enough to look at why
: it's broken and how to fix it.
It is broken because it assume too many implementation details about
symbol
In message <19990210135902.a7...@internal> Andre Albsmeier writes:
: Hmm, just finished my 3.1 upgrade, compiled socks and runsocks seems
: to work now. The only thing that doesn't work is compiling the telnet
: included with socks5:
:
: cc -I. -I../../include -I./../../include -O -pipe -DANDRE
-
In message
Kris
Kennaway writes:
: runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for
: (FTP clients, simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having problems
: with?
I have verified that runsocks works with both a.out and elf binaries
(but not both at the same time) with the most curr
On Fri, 12-Feb-1999 at 00:04:08 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > Hmm, just finished my 3.1 upgrade, compiled socks and runsocks seems
> > to work now. The only thing that doesn't work is compiling the telnet
> > included with socks5:
> >
> > cc -I. -
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> Hmm, just finished my 3.1 upgrade, compiled socks and runsocks seems
> to work now. The only thing that doesn't work is compiling the telnet
> included with socks5:
>
> cc -I. -I../../include -I./../../include -O -pipe -DANDRE
> -D__USE_FIXED_PROTOTY
On Wed, 10-Feb-1999 at 17:01:00 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5
> > package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault).
>
> runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I
On Wed, 10-Feb-1999 at 17:01:00 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5
> > package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault).
>
> runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5
> package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault).
runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for (FTP clients,
simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having prob
10 matches
Mail list logo