Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-19 Thread Terry Lambert
> : Yeah, this doesn't comple for some reason as of about 1.0r4. The port just > : doesn't bother trying to install it - no-one's cared enough to look at why > : it's broken and how to fix it. > > It is broken because it assume too many implementation details about > symbols being defined. A more

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-16 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Tue, 16-Feb-1999 at 22:05:05 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message > > Kris Kennaway writes: > : runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for > : (FTP clients, simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having problems > : with? > > I have verified that runsocks works with both

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-16 Thread Warner Losh
In message Kris Kennaway writes: : Yeah, this doesn't comple for some reason as of about 1.0r4. The port just : doesn't bother trying to install it - no-one's cared enough to look at why : it's broken and how to fix it. It is broken because it assume too many implementation details about symbol

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-16 Thread Warner Losh
In message <19990210135902.a7...@internal> Andre Albsmeier writes: : Hmm, just finished my 3.1 upgrade, compiled socks and runsocks seems : to work now. The only thing that doesn't work is compiling the telnet : included with socks5: : : cc -I. -I../../include -I./../../include -O -pipe -DANDRE -

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-16 Thread Warner Losh
In message Kris Kennaway writes: : runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for : (FTP clients, simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having problems : with? I have verified that runsocks works with both a.out and elf binaries (but not both at the same time) with the most curr

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-11 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Fri, 12-Feb-1999 at 00:04:08 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > Hmm, just finished my 3.1 upgrade, compiled socks and runsocks seems > > to work now. The only thing that doesn't work is compiling the telnet > > included with socks5: > > > > cc -I. -

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > Hmm, just finished my 3.1 upgrade, compiled socks and runsocks seems > to work now. The only thing that doesn't work is compiling the telnet > included with socks5: > > cc -I. -I../../include -I./../../include -O -pipe -DANDRE > -D__USE_FIXED_PROTOTY

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-10 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Wed, 10-Feb-1999 at 17:01:00 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5 > > package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault). > > runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I

Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-09 Thread Andre Albsmeier
On Wed, 10-Feb-1999 at 17:01:00 +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5 > > package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault). > > runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I

runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?)

1999-02-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > 2.2.x for a while. (I have problems using runsocks from the socks5 > package, but yet haven't figured out if it's my fault). runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for (FTP clients, simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having prob