Hello Alfred, hello everybody,
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 10:08:25PM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010519 21:57] wrote:
* Szilveszter Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010519 16:53] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I guess I was just being too happy so it had to get
Hello,
I am back with more information.
The machine had been up mostly idle for about 1 1/2 hours again.
I am starting to
suspect that it is being idle that may also trip the wire here... maybe,
given my 128megs of RAM and 300 megs of swap, that's when my computer
decides that it's time to
On Sat, 19 May 2001 22:48:51 -0400, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You'll have to provide more info before anyone can help you.
Well, that would require the kernel offering me more information.
Can you at least get a DDB traceback?
I have never succeeded in getting that to
This may not help much unless there is some common ground to be found.
I have been having problems with my old K6-2 300Mhz laptop hanging in X with
linux-communicator. From there I have not been able to get any debugging info.
Last night I did a power off/on reset and went to bed. This morning
I forgot to add that I'm not seeing any of this with the PIII's that I have
running current and usually updated daily.
This may not help much unless there is some common ground to be found.
I have been having problems with my old K6-2 300Mhz laptop hanging in X with
linux-communicator. From
The machine is up for about one minute and then I ran `startx' and the
screen turned black and it appeared to lockup, after about 30 seconds
plus some banging on the keyboard it rebooted. I have 256mb ram, so it
shouldn't be swapping at this point. The kernel and world are cvsupd
to about 12am
The follow fatal trap seems to be caused by the vm locking changes:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x3a
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc027a13e
stack pointer = 0x10:0xc35f0db8
frame
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:59:51PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote:
The machine is up for about one minute and then I ran `startx' and the
screen turned black and it appeared to lockup, after about 30 seconds
plus some banging on the keyboard it rebooted. I have 256mb ram, so it
shouldn't be
David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:59:51PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote:
The machine is up for about one minute and then I ran `startx' and the
screen turned black and it appeared to lockup, after about 30 seconds
plus some banging on the keyboard it rebooted. I
I broke swapping with the vm mutex.
Hopefully I should have this fixed up within a couple of days tops.
No, I'm not heading off to Aruba or someplace after this intrusive
change, I am working on it. Your kernel may panic, but I hope you
all keep a level head about this and don't follow suit.
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:29:22PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:59:51PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote:
The machine is up for about one minute and then I ran `startx' and the
screen turned black and it appeared to lockup, after
On 20-May-2001 Dima Dorfman wrote:
| Please try the attached patch. I make no claims of its correctness,
| but this e-mail is coming to you via X on -current updated a few hours
| ago so it works here :-).
Thanks, it works so far (I'm running X). I'll see where it breaks next.
Mike
--
[cc's trimmed]
aol
Same problem, this fixed me too.
/aol
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:23:11PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote:
On 20-May-2001 Dima Dorfman wrote:
| Please try the attached patch. I make no claims of its correctness,
| but this e-mail is coming to you via X on -current updated a
* Szilveszter Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010520 17:07] wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:29:22PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Please try the attached patch. I make no claims of its correctness,
but this e-mail is coming to you via X on -current updated a few hours
ago so it works here :-).
I was curious whether the memory limitation on the Sony VAIO Z505
machines was an actual hardware limitation or a marketing issue. I just
tried adding a 256MB module to my machine. The BIOS seemed to mostly
recognize it.
It did see 320MB of RAM, but had problems when testing all of it.
Current
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian CDs on FreeBSD with linux emulation way better than you can build
say a -STABLE release on a -CURRENT box... )
I just tried a Linux fdisk binary built in 1997 under FreeBSD-current.
It seemed to run perfectly except it couldn't determine the
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian CDs on FreeBSD with linux emulation way better than you can build
say a -STABLE release on a -CURRENT box... )
I just tried a Linux fdisk binary built in 1997 under FreeBSD-current.
It seemed to run perfectly except it couldn't determine the
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
This patch adds the prompt and passwd_prompt fields to the
/etc/login.conf, which makes lgoin more like getty in its ability
to be configured.
Cool, I used to hack mine by hand to look like OpenVMS...
Jamie
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
I sent a similar crash trace to Kirk recently, and he claimed to have
fixed it (look for a commit crediting me as a source of information
sometime in the last few days). However, given the currently VM problems,
you'll want to pull in those FFS patches carefully :-). Since I'm 500
miles from
19 matches
Mail list logo
