From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: KSrinivasa Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: none (cvs mirrors)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:46:15 -0700
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:24:58PM +, KSrinivasa Raghavan
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Chris Costello wrote:
On Saturday, September 08, 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
No actually not, I want something short and predictable like
VT_CODA.
How about my second suggestion: making v_tag point to
mp-mnt_stat.f_fstypename, or a copy thereof?
Good, but I as
On Saturday, September 08, 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
No, it should be pre-defined, because otherwise we will be
unable to use strcmp() in a few places when v_tag is abused.
So in these cases (which ideally would be eliminated rather
than considered for support), why can't you do:
if
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Bakul Shah wrote:
out-of order is probably ok for a buffer if you know that it's
presently yours to write into.
If the area being bcopied/bzeroed has this behavior why not
remove the volatile from the struct ptrs instead of fixing
bcopy/bzero?
One reason is that the
Why don't you add an early-out for namelength = 15 or put the
if-statement in the loop:
Index: machine.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.bin/top/machine.c,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.44 machine.c
--- machine.c
* Nick Hibma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010908 04:51] wrote:
Why don't you add an early-out for namelength = 15 or put the
if-statement in the loop:
This is a good idea, however it fails for the case when everyone
has been assigned usernames that are less than 15 characters, I
would suggest putting
Thank you for your report.
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:15:59AM +0900, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
Please send me the entire dmesg output after you boot
the system with boot -v at the loader prompt.
ok.
And do you have the following line in /boot/device.hints?
hint.psm.0.irq=12
yes. I tried with
Le 2001-09-08, Nick Hibma écrivait :
Why don't you add an early-out for namelength = 15 or put the
if-statement in the loop:
Well, in my case all usernames are = 8 characters, so the proposed
changes would not prevent a complete walk of the NIS db.
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
I was just checking something out in top, and noticed a big discrepancy in the core
usage for mozilla, and XF86 looks a bit heavier
than normal...
The mozilla in use is the linux netscape 6.10 dist direct from netscape [i avoided
installing the -port, because it was using some
kinda hacked
From the keyboard of Hellmuth Michaelis:
Perhaps i can find out more later as i now have to tell my kids
a goodnight story
How good that i did that - on today´s current postfix runs again
Anyway, the time i intended to work on -current and commit some bits to
it was once again just
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 07:32:17PM +0900, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
Your forgot to put the following lines in device.hints.
hint.atkbdc.0.at=isa
hint.atkbdc.0.port=0x60
See /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints.
no, I didn't forget. It wasn't required before now and I had 1 string less in unknown
Mike Smith wrote:
This is the general form of a different problem. The hints
DO NOT supply PNP identifiers. Got it yet?
You are adding nothing useful in terms of forward progress
on solving his problem by commenting on my postings instead
of addressing his issues, which I have at least
Hello,
on a 5.0-current i386-SMP system of today I am still getting on about
every second reboot the message:
boot() called on cpu #1
W
and then the sysetm hangs. When boot is called on cpu #0 everything works
as expected.
I think this started roughly two week from now. But I am not sure
if
On Saturday, September 08, 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I don't like idea to hardcode the same string (procfs), with the
same meaning in several places across kernel. As for your proposition
to use f_fstypename to set v_tag, it is even more bogus because
value of the f_fstypename is supplied
hmm,
i've posted the attached mail a week ago to this list, but got no
response. could someone please comment on this issue?
thanks,
christian
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 03:26:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Carstensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Christian Carstensen wrote:
hmm,
i've posted the attached mail a week ago to this list, but got no
response. could someone please comment on this issue?
I've also posted a patch(much less refined than yours, though) last month
but still got no
Hello,
on a 5.0-current i386-SMP system of today I am still getting on about
every second reboot the message:
boot() called on cpu #1
W
Try applying the enclosed patch.
- Tor Egge
Index: vm_machdep.c
===
RCS file:
17 matches
Mail list logo
