On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> John, (peter? others?)
>
> How is it that getting a ucred reference is guarded by PROC_LOCK(p)
> but freeing it is guarded by mtx_lock(&Giant);
> ?
>
> Call me naive, but shouldn't they be guarded by the same thing?
In fact, if we had good atomic
This is a note for someone upgrading from 4.4 stable to current 5.0
comes right out of my experience in doing so the file
/usr/src/UPGRADE doesnt detail the following step
I didnt see ne 1 post this before may be it will help
some newbie like myself and perhaps somebody will add
it to the UPGRA
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Bruce, for the low-level impared such as myself, can you give a quick
> precis on teh difference between "fast" interrupt handlers in -current
> and 'normal' interrupt handlers.
"Fast" interrupt handlers are harder to program and should rarely be used
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I'd like to commit the code to keep the ucred across userland,
> with the code to clear it to NULL kept under DEBUG ifdefs.
>
> i.e.
>
> > in trap(), ast() and syscall()
> >
> > if (td->td_ucred != p->p_ucred) {
> > PROC_LOCK(p
On 09-Feb-02 Julian Elischer wrote:
> I'm a little worried about invariants because the behaviour when
> INVARIANTS is set wil be different to teh behaviour when it is off, which
> is 'strange' to say the least. Normally the behaviour si the same but you
> just check for invariant conditions.
I
On 09-Feb-02 Julian Elischer wrote:
> John, (peter? others?)
>
> How is it that getting a ucred reference is guarded by PROC_LOCK(p)
> but freeing it is guarded by mtx_lock(&Giant);
> ?
>
> Call me naive, but shouldn't they be guarded by the same thing?
Naive, maybe. :-P The actual refcount
On 09-Feb-02 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> John, (peter? others?)
>>
>> How is it that getting a ucred reference is guarded by PROC_LOCK(p)
>> but freeing it is guarded by mtx_lock(&Giant);
>> ?
>>
>> Call me naive, but shouldn't they be guarde
Re: "Re: /dev/rtc not configured message when starting VMWare2 on -current"
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Munehiro Matsuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a hack^Wpatch that should fix your problem.
I think you need to prevent returning the value of uninitialized
variable (``error'')
I am trying to install one of the -current snapshots, but
current.freebsd.org doesn't seem to want to let me log in as anonymous
(some problem saying it cannot set guest access). Has the procedure
changed to get -current?
thanks
-j
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscr
Thanks
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> Yes, anything that reaches doreti checks for ASTs and runs userret() if
> necessary and possible (only for returns to user mode).
>
> Hmm, this check seems to be inadequate for fast interrupts. There is
> no check for rescheduling if the retu
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:38 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>
> [ snipped ATAPI -> SCSI conversion ]
>
> Doesn't burncd work for you on -current ?
Well, since you asked about it ... :)
Back in June I told you about the progress meter bogus
values in burncd and provided a patch in a private messa
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > I'd like to commit the code to keep the ucred across userland,
> > with the code to clear it to NULL kept under DEBUG ifdefs.
> >
> > i.e.
> >
> > > in trap(), ast() and syscall()
> > >
> > > if
On Sat, 09 Feb 2002 10:54:06 -0800
Jason Nordwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am trying to install one of the -current snapshots, but
> current.freebsd.org doesn't seem to want to let me log in as anonymous
> (some problem saying it cannot set guest access). Has the procedure
> changed to
No, the NFS server it depends on is down. Still working on getting it
back up.
>
> I am trying to install one of the -current snapshots, but
> current.freebsd.org doesn't seem to want to let me log in as anonymous
> (some problem saying it cannot set guest access). Has the procedure
> changed
++ 09/02/02 10:54 -0800 - Jason Nordwick:
| I am trying to install one of the -current snapshots, but
| current.freebsd.org doesn't seem to want to let me log in as anonymous
| (some problem saying it cannot set guest access). Has the procedure
| changed to get -current?
There have been some pro
It seems Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:38 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > [ snipped ATAPI -> SCSI conversion ]
> >
> > Doesn't burncd work for you on -current ?
>
> Well, since you asked about it ... :)
I asked for *problems* not cosmetic issues :)
> The bug (talking
While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or
``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\
With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade).
IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x004ed000
initial pcb at physical address 0x00411560
panicstr: bdwrite: buffer is not busy
On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or
> ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\
> With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade).
Only use fdisk on hard disks. Still it shouldn't panic. The bdwrite is just
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > Yes, anything that reaches doreti checks for ASTs and runs userret() if
> > necessary and possible (only for returns to user mode).
> >
> > Hmm, this check seems to be inadequate for fast interrupts. The
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> ...
> > > and in userret() and ast()
> > >
> > > >#ifdef DEBUG /*your choice of variable here*/
> > > > if (td->td_ucred != NULL) {
> > > >
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or
> > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\
> > With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade).
>
> Only use fdisk on hard dis
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> >
> > AST is not always called
> > and userret is always called, but unfortunatly sometimes multiple times
>
> userret() isn't always called either in my version :-). When I'm
> finished, it will never b
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26
> and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current about
> "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patches.
>
Can you commit the fix?
To Unsubscribe: s
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> >
> > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26
> > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current about
> > "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patc
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > AST is not always called
> > > and userret is always called, but unfortunatly sometimes multiple times
> >
> > userret() isn't always called either in my ver
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26
>> > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current
After comments by jhb and bde
--
++ __ _ __
| __--_|\ Julian Elischer | \ U \/ / hard at work in
| / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-->x USA\ a very strange
| ( OZ)\___ ___ |
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > AST is not always called
> > > > and userret is always called, but unfortunatly sometimes multiple tim
I'm the maintainer for ports/editors/joe, and just tried compiling it under
-CURRENT.
includes which includes ucontext.h
> cc -O -pipe -c umath.c
> In file included from b.h:6,
> from bw.h:23,
> from umath.c:5:
> rc.h:41: conflicting types for `getcontext'
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
