Thus spake Justin T. Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am running current cvsuped within this week. I have an adaptec
builtin scsi controller and a seagate drive attached to it and
after every bootup as soon as there is heavy disk activity
the drive gets disabled for 1 or 2 minutes and
Michael Smith wrote:
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Terry Lambert wrote:
Repeat: #1 is power profiles
I don't see why this requires an 'acpid'. You want a control tool,
sure, but power policy is not something that needs a daemon.
The tool has to change the settings based on
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
[snip]
That's arguably bad, sys/uuid.h shouldn't have any !_KERNEL prototypes
in it.
If there's a better place, then we should move it. We could put it in
uuid.h, but I don't want to make
After building yesterdays's CURRENT kernel, I get:
WARNING: Driver mistake
repeat make_dev(ttyv0)
panic: don't do that
The kernel config is pretty much GENERIC with two or three lines changed
to enable SMP.
-- Gerhard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK, it seems to be difficult to determine the region for any BIOSes.
I've decided to introduce a new loader tunable to indicate that BIOS
has broken int 12H. Attached patch back out 1.385.2.26 changes to
support older BIOSes, and add support for
At Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:20:16 +0100 (CET),
Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
attached is the /var/log/messages excerpt after booting
with a 120G Maxtor disk in a IceCube USB 2.0/Firewire Combo case.
The messages at the end are from an attempt to fdisk da0.
Booting with a USB cable works (as USB
Multilingual message - scroll down!
Deutsch:
---
Die Antivirus checkroutine unseres Mailservers (ms.dindi.com) hat festgestellt,
dass Sie von [EMAIL PROTECTED] (diese Adresse könnte gefälscht sein!!) eine
Hi,
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK, it seems to be difficult to determine the region for any BIOSes.
I've decided to introduce a new loader tunable to indicate that BIOS
has broken int 12H. Attached patch back out 1.385.2.26 changes to
support older BIOSes, and add
Hi,
Rule of the format:
ipfw add 100 skipto 400 log logamount 0 ip from 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.0.0/24
Will give this strange result:
Nov 10 17:01:05 portal kernel: ipfw: 100 SkipTo 400 TCP 192.168.0.1:139
192.168.0.2:1170 out via ed0
Nov 10 17:01:05 portal kernel: ipfw: 310 Pipe 2 TCP
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to sudo watch ttyv1 and ran into the following:
% Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
...
Looks like use of a NULL structure, accessing member at offsetof==0x60?
Anyway, I couldn't get a dump, but I'll keep trying... Also this
* De: Dima Dorfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-10 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Anyone seeing snp(4) problems? ]
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to sudo watch ttyv1 and ran into the following:
% Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
...
Looks like use of a
* De: Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-10 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Anyone seeing snp(4) problems? ]
I'll be able to try a new kernel+modules today and let you know.
No longer seeing it. Sorry for the false alarm.
juli.
--
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] | FreeBSD: The
Since going from a SMP to nonSMP kernel the Hard Locks don't
seem to be happening. However I'm getting panics.
I've gotten 4 'sleeping thread owns a mutex' panics and one each
of 'Assertion i != 0 failed at ../../../kern/subr_witness.c:669'
and 'Duplicate free of item 0xc3895cc0 from
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 04:04:11AM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Maxime Henrion wrote:
[snip]
That's arguably bad, sys/uuid.h shouldn't have any !_KERNEL prototypes
in it.
If there's a better place, then we
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This approach is okay with me in the sense that it doesn't break
anything that wasn't already broken, but as you say, I think we
can do better. Below is a patch that merely extracts the basemem
size from the bootinfo structure for the purposes
On Sun, 2002/11/10 at 17:40:47 +, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to sudo watch ttyv1 and ran into the following:
% Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
..
Looks like use of a NULL structure, accessing member at offsetof==0x60?
If there's a race why hasn't it been fixed in the main tree?
A swap issue makes sense. If I've been down long enough I get
swamped with email when I come back up. A bug in the latest
procmail yields 130M processes that fill up swap and make
the system be swap bound. The solution is the
On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 12:19 AM, Terry Lambert wrote:
Michael Smith wrote:
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Terry Lambert wrote:
Repeat: #1 is power profiles
I don't see why this requires an 'acpid'. You want a control tool,
sure, but power policy is not something that
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html returns a 403. Oops.
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Alex Zepeda wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html returns a 403. Oops.
It's been temporarily disabled.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: If the final word on this whole issue is You can't run binaries
: compiled for 4.x-RELEASE on 5.x-RELEASE then we should start puckering
: up.
:
: Developers tend to remember these things and you don't have to
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aurelien Nephtali [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I would like to know where/when the value 0xd0d0d0d0 is assigned to a pointer ?
: Sometimes I have some pointers which have a correct value before and suddenly
: they got this odd 0xd0d0d0d0 value :/
That's a
Frode Nordahl writes:
| On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 22:23, Hiten Pandya wrote:
| On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:27:47PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote the words in effect
|of:
| Hello,
|
| I have been searching mailing lists and my friend Google for information
| about a acpid (like apmd)
I have rewritten the rmuser.perl script into C. But got no experiense with at, and I
see the the perl port got a function that removes any at jobs for the user being
removed. So I wonderd if anyone could make a patch that does that, any feedback on the
code or bug reports would also be greate.
27 matches
Mail list logo